Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests
Re: nuke mekka | |
---|---|
by svenhauke » Thu Jun 25, 2015 4:41 pm | |
svenhauke
Posts: 89
|
the antik statues are only art, to destroy them is a waste of power
theres no one who prays to these statues let them be they heave no meaning if you destroy them you give them power |
Top |
Re: nuke mekka | |
---|---|
by gcomeau » Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:04 pm | |
gcomeau
Posts: 2747
|
okaaaaay.... I'm just going to leave you to monologue since you seem to be enjoying it.
|
Top |
Re: nuke mekka | |
---|---|
by Michael Everett » Fri Jun 26, 2015 12:19 am | |
Michael Everett
Posts: 2619
|
I partially agree with gcomeau.
Does the term spellcheck ring any bells, svenhauke? In fact, you may want to check your grammar as well. Of course, I understand if English is not your first language. Though, I am curious. Which language is? ~~~~~~
I can't write anywhere near as well as Weber But I try nonetheless, And even do my own artwork. (Now on Twitter)and mentioned by RFC! ACNH Dreams at DA-6594-0940-7995 |
Top |
Re: nuke mekka | |
---|---|
by Starsaber » Fri Jun 26, 2015 7:39 am | |
Starsaber
Posts: 255
|
I believe German is from one of his threads in the Honorverse forum. |
Top |
Re: nuke mekka | |
---|---|
by pokermind » Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:42 am | |
pokermind
Posts: 4002
|
Well Radical Islam is not playing nice again:
http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.com%2Fnews%2Fworld-europe-33284937&h=MAQHzRS2k http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.com%2Fnews%2Fworld-africa-33287978&h=MAQHzRS2k Hmm, makes one wonder why anyone would dare suggest nuking Mecca. Islam is spread by two things: Join our faith or die, and leave our faith and die. Well time to bring up a new controversial subject. CPO Poker Mind and, Mangy Fur the Smart Alick Spacecat.
"Better to be hung for a hexapuma than a housecat," Com. Pang Yau-pau, ART. |
Top |
Re: nuke mekka | |
---|---|
by Daryl » Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:29 pm | |
Daryl
Posts: 3562
|
Worth listening to -
https://www.youtube.com/embed/VmffgIqlAYA |
Top |
Re: nuke mekka | |
---|---|
by HB of CJ » Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:33 pm | |
HB of CJ
Posts: 707
|
Just mes, but I do not cares how bads the sppeeling, punchuation, sintax and grammour is as longs as I cans reed it. It is the intents ofs dee indeavours or lack of whiches importants. My coumptour has a speelll chzk?
|
Top |
Re: nuke mekka | |
---|---|
by biochem » Fri Oct 23, 2015 8:59 am | |
biochem
Posts: 1372
|
Very humorous. As it mentions I do think Obama doesn't genuinely see the threat of radical Islam for what it is. |
Top |
Re: nuke mekka | |
---|---|
by Daryl » Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:14 am | |
Daryl
Posts: 3562
|
A friend's comment led me to look into the bible and Sharia Law. Being too lazy to read the whole book I cheated and Googled "controversial bible verses".
I won't fill pages repeating what I found, but suffice to say the bible has everything I've ever heard about sharia and more. Women are to obey men in all things, adulterous women to be stoned, blasphemous people-gays-those breaking dietary laws-rebellious slaves-disobedient sons, (and much more), to be arbitrarily killed in various ways. Weird dietary laws and official discrimination against the disabled and menstruating women abound. Not all was in the Old Testament either. Thus the next time some religious person tries to justify their actions by saying "The bible says", I'll be even less receptive than I have been. |
Top |
Re: nuke mekka | |
---|---|
by gcomeau » Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:23 am | |
gcomeau
Posts: 2747
|
http://www.unilad.co.uk/video/prankster ... istianity/ |
Top |