Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests
Re: MA? abreviations? | |
---|---|
by kzt » Mon Sep 21, 2015 12:50 pm | |
kzt
Posts: 11360
|
I have no idea what you are talking about. I said that the Manticore Alliance had effectively collapsed as of the start of the second war. People said, not it was going strong. So now that we have agreed that it had in fact collapsed, what are you talking about?
|
Top |
Re: MA? abreviations? | |
---|---|
by Hutch » Mon Sep 21, 2015 3:47 pm | |
Hutch
Posts: 1831
|
I'm not sure that I would say collapsed. In dilapidated shape, no doubt. But while we know of two withdrawals (Talbot and Erewhon), Grayson, Idaho (not heard of until ART, granted, but still a member IIRC, Alizon and Zanzibar were still members, albeit with their share of gripes with the current Government. And with the Andies coming in as 'co-belligerents', if not full MA members, it could be argued (as indeed I am) that the MA was even stronger than it had been (in sheer number of ships) than it had been at the conclusion of the first Havenite war. The key is Grayson...it is the only other military power that amounts to much in the saga (except for the Andies, and MWW has indicated that they were not quite up to Manty and Grayson levels yet) and as long as they were part of the Alliance, it was still a formidable force (as Hamish and Yanakov proved). Now, as for the Alliance post-Eliose's visit to Manticore, I expect that the minor members will have the option of joining with the new GA, or saying, in effect, "Sorry, I'm sitting this one out." For example, Zanzibar may figure losing it's space industry twice in 20 years is quite enough and they'll beg off this time around. Idaho, with a wormhole, may not have quite as much choice in the matter. Interesting discussion. ***********************************************
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. What? Look, somebody's got to have some damn perspective around here! Boom. Sooner or later. BOOM! -LT. Cmdr. Susan Ivanova, Babylon 5 |
Top |
Re: MA? abreviations? | |
---|---|
by saber964 » Mon Sep 21, 2015 5:02 pm | |
saber964
Posts: 2423
|
I don't think the rest of minor all and worlds really have the option of sitting it out on the sidelines. Because if in unlikely event of Manticore getting punched out by the SLN, how long do you think it would take for OFS start itching to take over those worlds for there favorite corrupt transteller. It's going to be a massive case of 'either we all hang together or we all hang separately'. |
Top |
Re: MA? abreviations? | |
---|---|
by SWM » Mon Sep 21, 2015 5:17 pm | |
SWM
Posts: 5928
|
But what do you think those minor systems can actually contribute to the Grand Alliance? Sure, if the GA loses, they will probably be rolled over by the Solarian League--maybe in a century or two. But if they can't actually contribute to the Alliance, then why should they join the Alliance? The only thing that joining the Alliance would do to them is make them certain targets of the League now, instead of maybe being targets in a hundred years. If they join the Grand Alliance, all they will do is get in the way. --------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine |
Top |
Re: MA? abreviations? | |
---|---|
by Weird Harold » Mon Sep 21, 2015 6:03 pm | |
Weird Harold
Posts: 4478
|
I'm talking about the Manticore Alliance still being worth consulting about the treaty between Haven and Manticore; that strongly suggests that whatever disarray High Ridge may have induced, the Alliance is still viable.
There is textev to exactly that point -- somewhere. I didn't see it when searching for "alliance" earlier, but I do recall a discussion about letting, even urging, smaller systems to stay neutral against the League. .
. . Answers! I got lots of answers! (Now if I could just find the right questions.) |
Top |
Re: MA? abreviations? | |
---|---|
by Vince » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:37 pm | |
Vince
Posts: 1574
|
The textev was not about the smaller systems in the Manticoran Alliance staying neutral against the Solarian League. It was about possibly having some of the smaller Manticoran Alliance members declare non-belligerent status/neutrality with respect to the Republic of Haven, well before the formation of the Grand Alliance: Italics are the author's, boldface and underlined text is my emphasis. But the smaller systems in the Manticoran Alliance, as well as the individual systems that left the Republic of Haven prior to the formation of the Grand Alliance aren't going to have the luxury of sitting out the conflict between the Grand Alliance and the Mesan Alignment (although they may be able to sit out the conflict with the Solarian League, depending on how fast the League disintegrates): Italics are the author's, boldface and underlined text is my emphasis. The key phrase in the above quote is virtually the entire human-occupied galaxy choosing up sides. The Haven Quadrant (including the independent systems in the Manticoran Alliance and the neutral systems nearby), the Anderman Empire, the Silesian Confederacy (before partition between Manticore and the Anderman Empire), the Talbott Quadrant and Beowulf and all her daughter colonies combined do not come anywhere near "virtually the entire human-occupied galaxy". Add in the fact that events in the short story From the Highlands in the Changer of Worlds, Worlds of Honor #3 anthology pulled forward the reveal of the Mesan Alignment part of the story in the Honorverse before the Alignment (or David) had planned and it is even more likely that the smaller systems will be swept up in the coming war (Grand Alliance versus the Mesan Alignment), whether they like it or not. The only small independent systems that I see have a chance of sitting out hostilities encompassing either/or both the fall of the Solarian League and the war of the Grand Alliance versus the Mesan Alignment(aka the Renaissance Factor) are systems like Tiberian/Refuge* as long as they aren't in anyone significant's way or have something that anyone significant needs. * Refuge was the planet in the Tiberian system that Abigail Hearns visited** during her midshipman's cruise aboard HMS Gauntlet. Some details on the planet: Boldface is my emphasis. ** Visited as in was tasked by CPT(jg) Michael Oversteegen to contact the leaders of the planet and then ended up with her platoon of RMN Marines in combat (survival mode) against the pirates that went after her in the short story The Service of the Sword in The Service of the Sword, Worlds of Honor #4 anthology. -------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes. |
Top |
Re: MA? abreviations? | |
---|---|
by saber964 » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:38 pm | |
saber964
Posts: 2423
|
Well if Manticore goes out, its a jumping off point for all those independent worlds in the area. Plus the MWJ puts those world a hop skip and a jump from the core worlds. Think of a sinking ship and sharks in the water. |
Top |
Re: MA? abreviations? | |
---|---|
by Weird Harold » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:56 pm | |
Weird Harold
Posts: 4478
|
Thanks for finding that. I was looking in the wrong book. That isn't an indication of official policy, but I suspect that it was given serious consideration as official policy. It is, however, evidence that the Manticoran Alliance was still in effect, and being honored, after the start of the second war. The earlier citations from A Rising Thunder demonstrate that an unspecified number of allies were willing to hang in -- and after the Yawata Strike, Alizon's battlecruiser capable ship yard would be more important than it was in At All Costs I suspect that the MAlign won't be terribly interested in small nations in the Haven Quadrant until the League and GA are dealt with -- maybe a few centuries down the road if they're as smart as they think they are. .
. . Answers! I got lots of answers! (Now if I could just find the right questions.) |
Top |
Re: MA? abreviations? | |
---|---|
by SWM » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:22 pm | |
SWM
Posts: 5928
|
You didn't answer my question. What can the smaller systems in the Manticoran Alliance CONTRIBUTE? If they are only liabilities, places that Manticore will be forced to protect, and can't contribute anything significant to offset being liabilities, why should they join the Grand Alliance? If they are a net loss to the Alliance, the Alliance is better off without them. So, what can they contribute? --------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine |
Top |
Re: MA? abreviations? | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:28 pm | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8796
|
It just occurred to me that, at the moment, those small MA members do have something that very well could attrack MAlign attenting (if not SLN attention). They've got system defense installations with at least 2nd tier Manticoran technology. They probaby don't have Mycroft, Apollo equipped forts, or even Mk23E's in their pods -- but they do have LAC bases with Shrikes and Ferrets (and possibly Katanas) [all with improved compensators -- against not necessarily top of the line; but way better than anyone else is likely to have], they do have system defense pods full of Mk23 MDMs. If the MAlign thought there was any chance of a tech raid smash and grab... Those are some damned tempting targets. For that matter even a Havenite system's MDM pods or LACs would be a worthwhile grab; since those also have the "baffle" (the key to true MDMs) and improved compensators. And personally I wouldn't be willing to rely on the tamper resistant, anti-reverse engineering, features on those to protect the tech. Not when the stakes are that high. I agree that I don't see where the minor members would be able to make a positive contribution, the potential loss from not defending them might exceed the net loss involved in keeping them in the alliance. So while Manticore and Haven would probably like being able to encourage minor members to sit neutral in this conflict; I suspect to defend their tech edge they need to either continue to provide defense commitments heavy enough that a tech raid (even with spider ships) is quite unlikely to succeed, or they need to get an agreement to pull their tech out of the defenses as part of the treaty withdrawal. (Not going to be popular with the ex-treaty partner) Or maybe I'm being unduly pessimistic. Manticore does expect the rest of the galaxy to close the tech edge sooner or later. Maybe it isn't worth the diplomatic issues to reduce the chance that the tech spreads from an formerly allied system. |
Top |