snipped the initial quotes
saber964 wrote:
Under the RMN's new builds DD's have no marines.
IIRC under the old rules it was like this.
DD 1 platoon
CL 1 company
CA 1 battalion of 3 companies
BC 1 battalion of 4 companies
DN/SD 1 battalion with assault company plus assault shuttle's
New
DD none
CL 1 platoon
CA 1 company
BC 2 companies
e
SD(P) 1 battalion
bold added
Duckk commented on the fact we were discussing foreign navies. There is still a small nit, though. Wolfhound construction was
slowed, not halted.
That current DD classes have no marines isn't entirely true. The Rolands, where we have been observing the action, don't.
The Wolfhounds were designed to replace the older ships for general duties of commerce protection and secondary (non-Fleet) roles. While they were designed in the Janacek Admiralty, the same designers were also working on the Saganami B/C, Agamemnon, Nike, and Invictus. They likely would have been fielded several years earlier, if it wasn't for Janacek.
RFC has made the point that the Janacek Admiralty didn't have as much control over BuShips as they might have wanted. The Wolfhound/Avalon design wasn't built, apparently, until the emergency of 1918-19 and started commissioning at that time; doesn't mean they are a bad design. Just very overdue.
Wolfhounds are a functional lighter version of the Avalons, which HoS indicates are very well regarded by the WH admiralty. Avalons were NOT replaced by a CL version of Roland. I think there was a reason for that. The RMN may decide soon to build nothing but CLs, but in secondary zones, they don't need all the firepower of DDMs; if Foraker is already upgrading to the Erewhonese tech versions, Haven will be able to build and ammunition light ships both for their own use and for export to friendly and/or neutral governments.
One of the statements in HoS in the section on the Wolfhounds said the Admiralty (in 1921) had a plan to replace older destroyers with Wolfhounds, that was slowed down (not stalled entirely). The reversed their planned build numbers in the face of hostilities, because of the sims showing how much more capable the Rolands would be in Fleet actions. But the Wolfhound wasn't discarded entirely.
As of 1921, anyway.
The Wolfhounds are a lot better than older light cruisers, and secondary duties (like commerce protection, scouting and surveillance, etc) could be done without compromising the ability of the destroyer for the secondary missions of small ships as much as a Roland does. For instance, I expect the difference in crew sizes (Roland given as less than 75, the Wolfhound given as 84) is possibly a squad of Marines.
Missile defense on the Avalons and Wolfhounds uses the same equipment as the Rolands, so a DDM attack wouldn't necessarily cause them to lose; a lot depends on the range at the start of any engagement. And, with the off-bore launchers firing every 8 seconds, a Wolfhound isn't as outgunned in a shorter range conflict as another nation's DD class would be. In energy range, the advantage goes to the Wolfhounds' grasers.
Erewhon's Warrior class is similar in size, but uses the Culverin/Valiant ammunition, and lack off-bore capability. I haven't seen any Havenite DD specs in the second round, but they aren't likely to be better than the Warrior.
Even leaving the "current" designs out of the argument, I expect the next design of "light warship" -- whatever it is-- will include marines. The RMN has the interim of the infrastructure rebuild to build the officer corps/Marine force to any level they require, and the new population assets to do it; manning will be less of an issue in the years ahead.
Rob