Sorry guys - I actually wrote this reply DAYS ago, before I even saw that snippet #28 had finally been posted, and I thought I'd posted this. It was ready to post with one minor change (I edit too much!) and would have changed your reactions to my original post quite a bit.
I stand by every word you're about to read about Tom Clancy's murder by the way...
All right, having read that article, I have no problem with people selling ARCs of RFC's books on Ebay - except for the possible lost sale of a hardback when the book comes out. On the other hand, a fan who's hardcore enough to spend $400 on an ARC probably has RFC's entire series, so he/she is likely to buy the hardback anyway. (And is quite possibly a lurker or contributor to this site! Confess!)
However, if someone scans the ARC and posts it on the internet, a la "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows" then Tor should indeed use their lawyers to smash that person into oblivion, since that isn't reselling something that you own, it's
copying and reselling something that you own, which is clearly prohibited by the court's decision.
That's why I'd suggest stealing a page from a Tom Clancy novel I read years ago before the government murdered him. Yes, I'm serious, he was poisoned by something exotic that stopped his heart, then his body was held for five days until it was too late to find any poisons in the autopsy. Not one bit suspicious, move along, nothing to see here... A great author who will be missed - and his latest series still had several books to go! Not germane to this discussion though, so I'll get back to Clancy's clever ploy...
In novel I'm referring to, each copy of a classified document had several unique changes made to it, so any copy leaked to the press could be traced back to the person who originally received it. Make some subtle changes here and there in the novel, and Tor would know which of their ARCs had been copied and given away to the world. Better yet, edit each page so it has a serial number at a random spot in the text, and that would pretty much end any temptation for anyone to scan their ARC to the internet. (I can think of several other ways to make each ARC distinct without tipping off the reader, so I'm sure Tor can as well - a unique watermark for each ARC would do the job quite nicely.)
The next part was written before I saw that Snippet #28 had finally arrived after a 3 week wait, making it the second snippet to be posted in seven weeks. Granted those snippets were a chapter long in an effort for RFC to repay us for having to wait so long between snippets, so to quote Ron Weasley "Mind you, we learned loads!" Extra credit for the first person who can cite which book and who he was talking to! For my sanity, I wish the book was coming out in the next couple of weeks as originally scheduled. I also wish Drak was in charge of posting the snippets, since real life seems to be catching up with RFC to the point that he's unable or distracted from posting regular snippets. I'd be happier checking in 3 times a week to read a few paragraphs than dropping by once a month to read a chapter. The discussion of what's going to happen is what makes these forums fun, and that's suffering due to the dearth of new snippets, as exciting as the chapter-long snippets we've received weeks apart have been.
So despite the fun occasional comments RFC adds to the snippets, and the cliffhanger scene changes like "What the HELL is THAT?" (Which I fully enjoyed, and he just did it to us again!) I'd have a better experience with the snippets if Drak had the job. Plus he could lord the snerk collar over us in his unique, insufferable way...
I sincerely DO realize that RFC may well be reaching the limit of how much of the book was going to be snippeted, based on the delay in the publication schedule. If the snippets are further apart simply because there isn't much left to snippet, I can understand and accept that, but it would be nice to KNOW that's the case.
Meanwhile, I'm waiting as fast as I can...