John Prigent wrote:Did I disturb your equanimity, Cthia? Sorry about that. No, I've never had that experience so I'll defer to you. FWIW, we've been happily married for more than 50 years so I don't think she'll dump me now.
Cheers
John
cthia wrote:John Prigent wrote:Well over half a decade, roseandheather? Is that all? Some of us have been following it for over two decades .
Cheers
John (with tongue firmly in cheek)
Yes John. But you followed the series literally. She followed the series emotionally with her heart and soul. That more than makes up for the difference in exposure.
In the words of a woman. You love the series and the characters but Rose is in love with the series and the characters.
If you've never had a woman dumping you and explaining the difference of loving you and being in love with you, then you're lucky. It's the pits - so I've heard.
No no John. That was accomplished many moons ago by Madeleine Rebecca Sousa - my next door neighbor. I had fallen deeply in love with her. She had only loved me. In the end, she was quite right. We had grown too close for it to ever work. I didn't want to hear it at the time.
Point is, there is a huge difference between loving and being in-love with characters or storyline. After my first time reading A Little Princess I was the authority on it. I had feelings invested. I was in love, much like Rose with certain Havenites.
True love is profound even at first read.