Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests

Getting to space without violating the Proscriptions

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Getting to space without violating the Proscriptions
Post by AirTech   » Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:35 pm

AirTech
Captain of the List

Posts: 476
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:37 am
Location: Deeeep South (Australia) (most of the time...)

Dilandu wrote:
SWM wrote:
That is indeed more than I remembered off the top of my head. But it does not completely invalidate the premise that if you can build a ship to reach orbital height, you probably can build a ship to reach orbital velocity.


Only in theory. The first rockets were send to orbital height in 1946, but it took almost 11 years and a lot of resources to send sattelite into space. And to achieve the orbit that isn't send you into the planet surface, you would need at least some guidance and active maneuvering capability AFTER launch.


Orbit is easy (that just needs enough thrust, for long enough in the right general direction), circular orbit is hard and a circular orbit in a predictable position is really hard (that needs telemetry and really complex controls). ICBMs don't have telemetry or external guidance and with 1950's guidance could still get within a couple of miles of their target. Now if you do what the Germans did, and launch 3,172 rockets (out of 6,048 built)hitting something out of pure dumb luck is a possibility - if nothing else you will clutter up low orbit with rocket casings enough to make them unheathly(look up Kessler Syndrome - a good reason to aim for highly elliptical orbits with very low perigee's).
Top
Re: Getting to space without violating the Proscriptions
Post by Dilandu   » Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:59 pm

Dilandu
Admiral

Posts: 2538
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Russia

AirTech wrote:and with 1950's guidance could still get within a couple of miles of their target.


Yes - but they generally relied upon the radio control, because the inertial systems before "Atlas"-E wasn't good enough.
------------------------------

Oh well, if shortening the front is what the Germans crave,
Let's shorten it to very end - the length of Fuhrer's grave.

(Red Army lyrics from 1945)
Top
Re: Getting to space without violating the Proscriptions
Post by SWM   » Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:57 pm

SWM
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5928
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: U.S. east coast

Dilandu wrote:
AirTech wrote:and with 1950's guidance could still get within a couple of miles of their target.


Yes - but they generally relied upon the radio control, because the inertial systems before "Atlas"-E wasn't good enough.

No, ICBMs did not have radio control. They had internal inertial guidance systems, only.
--------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine
Top
Re: Getting to space without violating the Proscriptions
Post by Dilandu   » Fri Jul 17, 2015 12:40 am

Dilandu
Admiral

Posts: 2538
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Russia

SWM wrote:No, ICBMs did not have radio control. They had internal inertial guidance systems, only.


Sigh. Re-read manuals. Both the early "Atlas", and the "Titan-I", and the R-7 "Semyorka" have a radio-controlled guidance, because the inertial systems on the time of their design were considered too inaccurate even for megaton-range warheads. They need control centers with radars, that tracked the missile during the boost phase, and ordered corrections via datalink, if the tragectory wasn't as predicted. The "Atlas"-E modification was the first ICBM, that relied on the inertial guidance.
------------------------------

Oh well, if shortening the front is what the Germans crave,
Let's shorten it to very end - the length of Fuhrer's grave.

(Red Army lyrics from 1945)
Top

Return to Safehold