Expert snuggler wrote:Come to think of it, why on earth hasn't Merlin done anything to make slide rules happen?
I mentioned some weeks ago how I missed my old slide rule.
Were RFC to put one in I'd get all sentimental.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests
Re: calculating machines on Safehold | |
---|---|
by wingfield » Fri Jul 10, 2015 9:00 am | |
wingfield
Posts: 110
|
I mentioned some weeks ago how I missed my old slide rule. Were RFC to put one in I'd get all sentimental. |
Top |
Re: calculating machines on Safehold | |
---|---|
by evilauthor » Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:43 am | |
evilauthor
Posts: 724
|
THere aren't any slide rules? Doesn't some of the new applied math basically require slide rules to do? |
Top |
Re: calculating machines on Safehold | |
---|---|
by MTO » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:13 pm | |
MTO
Posts: 37
|
There is no math that *must* be done on a slide rule. Slide rules allow fast computation of good approximations. Slide rules were a minor improvement on a previous system used by astronomers involving trigonometric identities (eg sin(a)*sin(b)=(cos(a+b)-cos(a-b))/2) . Using lookup tables, this could dramatically speed up calculations. Logarithms saved a few steps and improved accuracy, while only requiring one lookup table instead of 6. In the real world, this was all done by mathematician astronomers who were trying to predict the location of heavenly bodies. It seems to me the proscriptions mean, among so much else, that there is little research into astronomy. So I wonder who would come up with these methods? Wikipedia has a good page on the process, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosthaphaeresis |
Top |
Re: calculating machines on Safehold | |
---|---|
by n7axw » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:19 pm | |
n7axw
Posts: 5997
|
I haapened across my K&E the other day. Over 50 years old and still remember how to use it! Don When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
|
Top |
Re: calculating machines on Safehold | |
---|---|
by wingfield » Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:47 pm | |
wingfield
Posts: 110
|
Mine would have been nearly that by now (about 45 years old) but I can't remember the brand. In my head I can visualise slipping it straight to a simple calculation! |
Top |
Re: calculating machines on Safehold | |
---|---|
by shaeun » Wed Sep 30, 2015 8:33 pm | |
shaeun
Posts: 44
|
Honestly, we know that the Difference Engine and the Analytic Engine both work as they have both been built and they do work. These machines are excellent analogues for digital computing and would be best built by the Go4... Imagine the Go4 trying to replicate them.. Charis doesn't have to build them, just make the Go4 think they are... It would then also explain where all of the artillery and log/sin/cos tables generated by OWL came from. |
Top |