Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests

Something that Langhorne probably did

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Something that Langhorne probably did
Post by isaac_newton   » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:48 am

isaac_newton
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1182
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:37 am
Location: Brighton, UK

runsforcelery wrote:I regret the fact that when I started mapping Safehold I couldn't find a software package which would let me both generate an entirely unique world and measure its distances in accurate projection. The software I use will let me display a globe that shows how the projection would work, but I can't scale from it. Because of that, I've accepted "flat," geographically impossible distances in order to measure them consistently. That is, it lets me reproduce distances which are the same from measurement to measurement even though they are not accurate measures of the "actual distances. This was a necessary evil, since I would rapidly have gone insane trying to move military units (or anything else) on a planetary scale without it. :roll:

SNIP.


Well. I'm sure that I speak for all, when I say that I'm v glad indeed you chose not to go off the rails :lol:
Top
Re: Something that Langhorne probably did
Post by SWM   » Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:13 am

SWM
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5928
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: U.S. east coast

For those interested, Ensign Reread has transformed the existing Safehold map onto a globe using the Celestia software package. Images and files can be found at http://www.lepp.cornell.edu/~seb/celestia/weber/.

There may be some inaccuracies in it, of course. Reread was concerned that there might be some pixels missing where the map wraps around and at the poles. And, of course, it should not be used for estimating distances on Safehold, since David uses the flat projection map for those calculations.
--------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine
Top
Re: Something that Langhorne probably did
Post by teh_pos   » Tue Jun 16, 2015 7:51 am

teh_pos
Midshipman

Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:15 am

looktowindward wrote:Next time you design a world...I recommend MapInfo. Its a professional GIS package that would make this a bit easier. There is a free Basic version.


MapInfo is pretty good (or was around version 8) at creating new data when you had a starting point available, but creating a whole new set of data from scratch at "global scale" would be pushing it. Although, at this point, if I had time on my hands, it would be kind of fun to bring in the existing map into QGIS or MapInfo or ArcMap (if you can afford it) and try to georeference everything. How does the MapIinfo basic compare to QGIS (Open source/free GIS Suite)?
Top

Return to Safehold