Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests

HFQ Official Snippet #26 (I think)

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #26 (I think)
Post by isaac_newton   » Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:40 am

isaac_newton
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1182
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:37 am
Location: Brighton, UK

lyonheart wrote:Hi Isaac Newton,

Thanks for the data and link.

Taking out Nybar means eliminating the best of Wyrshym's army without the rest having a clue how it was done, demoralizing those who know; 'because if those guys didn't have a chance, we're toast' will spread no matter what the command [and inquisition] orders kept quiet.

The garrison at Esthyr's Abbey of 4500 men requires some 33.75 tons of food per 5day, or 5 dragon wagon loads every 20 days, plus at least the same if not double or triple that number of dragons for coal or fuel wood [from the description they were running out of local trees quickly], plus cooking oil, fodder [up to ~20 wagon loads for the 3 remaining cavalry regiments], ammunition and clothing etc for roughly up around 44 dragon wagon loads every 4 5days, and BGV may have scheduled his attack just after the last arrival and departure; or possibly before departure, depending on your judgement of when is best.

L


isaac_newton wrote:SNIP


You're v welcome. St Albans is well worth a visit, especially with the old Roman ruins just outside.

Thanks for the supply estimates. I guess that the actual arrivals may be a lot less given the bad situation in general.

BTW how far away will the upcoming bombardment be audible from - assuming clear stillish weather which seems to be the present state of affairs? That would be a flare lit tip-off to any approaching COGA personel.
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #26 (I think)
Post by Peter2   » Thu Jun 11, 2015 8:02 am

Peter2
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 371
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 10:54 am

lyonheart wrote:Hi Peter2,

Given its around 500 miles from Fairkyn to just the Ice Ash and Guarnak-Sylmahn canal junction, two days or just over 53 hours [assuming the moon cooperates] means an average speed of less than 10 mph, wall impacts or collisions at that speed usually aren't too serious or fatal, and I'm more than willing to accept 3-4 days or 5-6 mph for the transit and still secure strategic surprise on Wyrshym.

The canal is 50 yards wide so the ice boats have more maneuver room than you may have considered, and I expect the second wave of scouts might hang navigation lanterns a few feet down on the canal walls every few hundred yards after dark if the moon is late for the main body to guide on.

My previous posts explained I was less interested in speed than delivering BGV ready for battle, ie larger slower ice boats massing more for more cargo, which the RCA might have had some, but ICA could definitely afford many more and bigger ones.

Depending on your estimate of their carrying capacity, and a reasonable safety gap, say ~400 yards for each large cargo boat, 150-200 such might mean a line some 34-45 miles long, advancing ~250 miles per day.

Remember RFC pointing out the the ICA had developed some unusually rapid winter transport?

Ice boats might have been part of what he was hinting at.

L

[snip]



Hi Lyonheart, and thank you for that. I take your points about the width of the canals and the increased flexibility that gives.

The river by where we used to live is roughly 40 yards wide, with a dinghy sailing club on it. I've occasionally watched them race, and the reason for my doubts arises from watching them. Running before the wind is no problem, and on a dead run, they can get up a pretty decent speed. However, they have to do a considerable amount of tacking to sail upwind, and the width of the river then comes into play. I still have doubts that anything sail-propelled much bigger than the dinghies could make any sort of decent progress against contrary winds on water of such limited width. They would have to wait for following winds – which of course would hinder traffic coming the other way. Galleys would work, but would have to pass each other with care.

(For background – there is a weir a few miles downriver to control levels, so there is no navigable connection with the sea, and the land upriver is arable, so there is no incentive to get bigger boats up it.)
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #26 (I think)
Post by lyonheart   » Thu Jun 11, 2015 8:27 am

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hi Isaac Newton,

First, I never got to St. Albans in the two years I was in southern England, like a lot of other places that would have been on my list if I could have had one, but those I talked to that did enjoyed it very much. ;)

Since the sound energy is inversely proportional to the square of the distance, most 19th century battles and bombardments weren't heard more than 5 or 6 miles away except under unusual atmospheric or geographic circumstances, IIRC.

20th century wars often used a bit more explosives so the sound carried a bit further, but the noise from some atomic bomb tests at the Nevada test sight weren't heard by some nearby observers while windows were shattered at Las Vegas much further away because the sound wave 'skipped' or bounced back from the atmosphere.

Given how far out the scout snipers are, NTM BGV's SNARC's, I doubt anyone will hear anything from the bombardment, especially how brief it's likely to be.

Certainly BGV would have thought about anybody eavesdropping on his little surprise if anyone was near enough, from the snippet there isn't anyone.

L


isaac_newton wrote:
lyonheart wrote:Hi Isaac Newton,

Thanks for the data and link.

Taking out Nybar means eliminating the best of Wyrshym's army without the rest having a clue how it was done, demoralizing those who know; 'because if those guys didn't have a chance, we're toast' will spread no matter what the command [and inquisition] orders kept quiet.

The garrison at Esthyr's Abbey of 4500 men requires some 33.75 tons of food per 5day, or 5 dragon wagon loads every 20 days, plus at least the same if not double or triple that number of dragons for coal or fuel wood [from the description they were running out of local trees quickly], plus cooking oil, fodder [up to ~20 wagon loads for the 3 remaining cavalry regiments], ammunition and clothing etc for roughly up around 44 dragon wagon loads every 4 5days, and BGV may have scheduled his attack just after the last arrival and departure; or possibly before departure, depending on your judgement of when is best.

L


*quote="isaac_newton"*SNIP
*quote*

You're v welcome. St Albans is well worth a visit, especially with the old Roman ruins just outside.

Thanks for the supply estimates. I guess that the actual arrivals may be a lot less given the bad situation in general.

BTW how far away will the upcoming bombardment be audible from - assuming clear stillish weather which seems to be the present state of affairs? That would be a flare lit tip-off to any approaching COGA personel.*quote*
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #26 (I think)
Post by lyonheart   » Thu Jun 11, 2015 8:38 am

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hi Peter2,

The Wiki article on ice boats says they can travel up to ten times the wind velocity and within 7 degrees of the wind, which for 1 or 2 man crews sail handling is quite impressive.

The Icicle, built in 1869 for FDR's Uncle John, was ~69 feet long and carried over a thousand square feet of sail and regularly beat the train to Poughkeepsie.

50 yards is still quite a narrow path, and RFC could easily blow my supposition out of the ice for several reasons, but until then its still possible.

L


Peter2 wrote:
lyonheart wrote:Hi Peter2,

Given its around 500 miles from Fairkyn to just the Ice Ash and Guarnak-Sylmahn canal junction, two days or just over 53 hours [assuming the moon cooperates] means an average speed of less than 10 mph, wall impacts or collisions at that speed usually aren't too serious or fatal, and I'm more than willing to accept 3-4 days or 5-6 mph for the transit and still secure strategic surprise on Wyrshym.

The canal is 50 yards wide so the ice boats have more maneuver room than you may have considered, and I expect the second wave of scouts might hang navigation lanterns a few feet down on the canal walls every few hundred yards after dark if the moon is late for the main body to guide on.

My previous posts explained I was less interested in speed than delivering BGV ready for battle, ie larger slower ice boats massing more for more cargo, which the RCA might have had some, but ICA could definitely afford many more and bigger ones.

Depending on your estimate of their carrying capacity, and a reasonable safety gap, say ~400 yards for each large cargo boat, 150-200 such might mean a line some 34-45 miles long, advancing ~250 miles per day.

Remember RFC pointing out the the ICA had developed some unusually rapid winter transport?

Ice boats might have been part of what he was hinting at.

L

[snip]



Hi Lyonheart, and thank you for that. I take your points about the width of the canals and the increased flexibility that gives.

The river by where we used to live is roughly 40 yards wide, with a dinghy sailing club on it. I've occasionally watched them race, and the reason for my doubts arises from watching them. Running before the wind is no problem, and on a dead run, they can get up a pretty decent speed. However, they have to do a considerable amount of tacking to sail upwind, and the width of the river then comes into play. I still have doubts that anything sail-propelled much bigger than the dinghies could make any sort of decent progress against contrary winds on water of such limited width. They would have to wait for following winds – which of course would hinder traffic coming the other way. Galleys would work, but would have to pass each other with care.

(For background – there is a weir a few miles downriver to control levels, so there is no navigable connection with the sea, and the land upriver is arable, so there is no incentive to get bigger boats up it.)
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #26 (I think)
Post by Peter2   » Thu Jun 11, 2015 2:22 pm

Peter2
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 371
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 10:54 am

lyonheart wrote:Hi Peter2,

The Wiki article on ice boats says they can travel up to ten times the wind velocity and within 7 degrees of the wind, which for 1 or 2 man crews sail handling is quite impressive.

The Icicle, built in 1869 for FDR's Uncle John, was ~69 feet long and carried over a thousand square feet of sail and regularly beat the train to Poughkeepsie.

50 yards is still quite a narrow path, and RFC could easily blow my supposition out of the ice for several reasons, but until then its still possible.

L




Hi Lyonheart,

Within 7° of the apparent wind really is impressive. I didn't realise there was such a difference between ice boats and sailing on water.
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #26 (I think)
Post by runsforcelery   » Thu Jun 11, 2015 2:33 pm

runsforcelery
First Space Lord

Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:39 am
Location: South Carolina

Consider it blown. :D

50 yards is way too narrow for any sort of wind powered craft capable of carrying a remotely worthwhile load of cargo or even passengers.

Whatever your wiki article (and we all know what unimpeachable sources of knowledge those are :roll:) may have to say about racing ice boats, it does not apply to craft capable of carrying worthwhile payloads consistently. In any vessel of useful size, if the wind is anywhere forward of the beam, you'll have to tack (which would be a copper plated bitch in a waterway that narrow), and --- trust me --- no one placed the canals to take advantage of the prevailing winds.

Lyon, if it was possible for your ice boat idea to work, then the default motive power for the canal barges would be sail, not dragon draft animals. After all, if ice boats could sail along the canals with complete freedom of movement (or even moderate freedom of movement) why couldn't boats that float do the same thing?

Now, what the frozen canals do normally allow is the use of large, dragon drawn sleds. This is what Duchairn was ruling out (at least for the entire length of the supply chain) because of the empty canal beds and aqueduct sections.

Sorry.


lyonheart wrote:Hi Peter2,

The Wiki article on ice boats says they can travel up to ten times the wind velocity and within 7 degrees of the wind, which for 1 or 2 man crews sail handling is quite impressive.

The Icicle, built in 1869 for FDR's Uncle John, was ~69 feet long and carried over a thousand square feet of sail and regularly beat the train to Poughkeepsie.

50 yards is still quite a narrow path, and RFC could easily blow my supposition out of the ice for several reasons, but until then its still possible.

L




"Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as Piglet came back from the dead.
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #26 (I think)
Post by USMA74   » Thu Jun 11, 2015 2:52 pm

USMA74
Commander

Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:22 am
Location: Leavenworth, KS, USA

EdThomas wrote:
n7axw wrote:Do we have any textev to suggest that the second wave has moved out of Allyntyn? I don't remember any..


Don


hi Don,
I don't recall any and must admit to engaging in some not so wild speculation :) that he's not going to leave the rest of the Corp sitting in Allyntyn while he marches on with his 2 brigades to Fairkyn.
The High Roads to and from Allyntyn are going to be his Main Supply Route until gets to Fairkyn at a minimum. The MSR has to be built which means depots at about a days march apart, repair facilities, corrals for the caribou, snow dragons and High Hallows etc, etc.
Even though he knows he's not going to run into anything significant , he has to make like he thinks he might so he can't leave his main body/reserve too far behind. I picked a day's march. USMA74 and/or Lyonheart can probably tell us how this kind of movement is done in real life (hint, hint :) )
MSR depots would probably also include secure detention facilities to allow pows to be moved to permanet camps. It would make sense to build such a facility right there at the Abbey.
Troop movement along the MSR might utilize large sleds or wagons to carry two-legged items to decrease transit times.


As requested:

ATTP 3-97.11, Cold Region Operations, dated 2011 provides the following information:

"The normal planning rate for troops on hard-packed, gently rolling terrain is 4 kilometers (KM) per hour. When crossing snow or hilly terrain, this rate decreases. Table 4-1 helps leaders judge the approximate rate of march for troops. These figures were calculated with personnel wearing the typical combat load."

Extract from that referenced Table 4-1, Rates of march for individual movement:

On foot, no ski or snowshoe in less than 30 centimeter (cm) of snow an individual can move 1.5 to 3 kilometers per hour (kph) on an unbroken trail. On a broken trail that individual can move 2 to 3 kph.

On foot, no ski or snowshoe in more than 30 cm of snow an individual can move .5 to 1 kph on an unbroken trail. On a broken trail that individual can move 2 to 3 kph.

Using snowshoes an individual can move 1.5 to 3 kph on an unbroken trail and 3 to 4 kph on a broken trail.

A skiing individual can move 1.5 to 5 kph on an unbroken trail and 5 to 6 kph on a broken trail.

Add 1 hour for every 300 meters of ascent and 1 hour for every 600 meters of decent.

Unbroken trail is moving through undisturbed--or unbroken--snow greater than 30 cm, the lead two or three personnel have to pack the snow for the rest of file. Once accomplished, the trial then becomes broken. The lead personnel will exert more effort and will need to be cycled to the rear of the formation every 15 to 30 minutes.

Please remember that groups, especially large groups, move slower than an individual can move.
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #26 (I think)
Post by n7axw   » Thu Jun 11, 2015 4:27 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Well, Lyonheart,

RFC might have blown you off the ice...but it was an interesting idea while it lasted... 8-) :lol:

The other thing that concerned me was snow drifts. Living in an area where storms and drifting snow are a reality that renders snow ploughs a necessity if people are going to keep moving to and fro, I would imagine that the drifting across those canals would a copper plated bitch to keep up with, esp. with muscle power. Then too, if those canals are cut lower than the surrounding landscape, my, my. You'd be better off on the road above the canal.

Not saying that it can't be done, but most surely it won't be easy, Blowers and ploughs run by internal combustion engines are against the proscriptions, doncha know (tongue in cheek).

But maybe something can be devised using stream, provided they can figure out how to keep the water in the boiler from freezing up...let's have Dr. Lewys invent anti-freeze!

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #26 (I think)
Post by EdThomas   » Thu Jun 11, 2015 4:45 pm

EdThomas
Captain of the List

Posts: 518
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:47 pm
Location: Rhode Island USA

lyonheart wrote:Hi Peter2,

The Wiki article on ice boats says they can travel up to ten times the wind velocity and within 7 degrees of the wind, which for 1 or 2 man crews sail handling is quite impressive.

SNIP

Hi L,
the article says "apparent" wind..Apparent wind is tricky. In general sailors will say it moves the wind forward. the problem comes from the nasty effects increasing wind speeds have on objects in their path especially light hulls with ony thin steel rails holding them to the ice.
Fore and aft rigged boats with gaff and boom rigged sails can be sailed by very small 2-3 man crews. The downeast schooners that brought lumber and granite from Maine to New York typically had such small crews. The secret is the boats can be tacked simply by putting the helm over with virtually no crew action.
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #26 (I think)
Post by EdThomas   » Thu Jun 11, 2015 10:05 pm

EdThomas
Captain of the List

Posts: 518
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:47 pm
Location: Rhode Island USA

USMA74 wrote:SNIP
As requested:

ATTP 3-97.11, Cold Region Operations, dated 2011 provides the following information:

"The normal planning rate for troops on hard-packed, gently rolling terrain is 4 kilometers (KM) per hour. When crossing snow or hilly terrain, this rate decreases. Table 4-1 helps leaders judge the approximate rate of march for troops. These figures were calculated with personnel wearing the typical combat load."

Extract from that referenced Table 4-1, Rates of march for individual movement:

On foot, no ski or snowshoe in less than 30 centimeter (cm) of snow an individual can move 1.5 to 3 kilometers per hour (kph) on an unbroken trail. On a broken trail that individual can move 2 to 3 kph.

On foot, no ski or snowshoe in more than 30 cm of snow an individual can move .5 to 1 kph on an unbroken trail. On a broken trail that individual can move 2 to 3 kph.

Using snowshoes an individual can move 1.5 to 3 kph on an unbroken trail and 3 to 4 kph on a broken trail.

A skiing individual can move 1.5 to 5 kph on an unbroken trail and 5 to 6 kph on a broken trail.

Add 1 hour for every 300 meters of ascent and 1 hour for every 600 meters of decent.

Unbroken trail is moving through undisturbed--or unbroken--snow greater than 30 cm, the lead two or three personnel have to pack the snow for the rest of file. Once accomplished, the trial then becomes broken. The lead personnel will exert more effort and will need to be cycled to the rear of the formation every 15 to 30 minutes.

Please remember that groups, especially large groups, move slower than an individual can move.


Many thanks for taking the time to dig this out. Mother Nature is a harsh mistress.
Top

Return to Safehold