Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests
why stay in hyper for only 10 years? | |
---|---|
by captinjoehenry » Wed May 27, 2015 2:50 pm | |
captinjoehenry
Posts: 147
|
so when they did operation breakaway why did they only stay in hyper for 10 years? I mean if you are doing an all or nothing bet for survival and you have anti aging treatments why not stay in hyper for 50 years that won't be too bad admittedly it would be a bit boring for the crews but i mean the survival of your species is at stake and if you stayed in hyper for 50 years you would most likely come out of hyper in a whole other galaxie.
On that thought why not just set out on the shortest path out of the galaxy? i mean if you are really really going for it just leave the whole galaxy in total and if you are fleeing out of the galaxy i know if i were any evil alien empire i would only bother looking for my enemies on planets and not out in intergalactic space. sure it would take hundreds of years but they are bound to have spare cryo pods so they just alternate in and out of cryo. Now this is a fairly far fetched i know but i would think this would be doable and if you do that you can be sure as hell the gbaba won't find you i mean what do they care you are MILLIONS of light years away. Sure you probably wont ever get to go back and kill the gbaba but they sure as hell wont kill you. EDIT: the 100s year figure assumes a 5000c speed in hyper and the nearest galaxy is the andromeda galaxy EDIT 2: if they were in hyper for 10 years at 5000c on a random vector they are very VERY lucky to have found a star in their galaxy at all as the milky way is 100,000 light years across and 10 years at 5000c would most likely carry you out of the galaxy on a random vector and if they did a random vector they might have gone out the top or bottom of the galaxy so WOW they lucked out they totally lucked out that a random vector kept them in the galaxie. So why on earth are the gabba even looking that far? i mean if they are looking that far out whenever they kill a civilization i am amazed that there is anything left in the galaxie. Oh and how did they miss earth when they killed that other alien civilization mentioned in the first book? i mean earth was less than 50 light years away as crestfall was 50 light years away from earth and that was the farthest colony.... OK going to stop asking so many questions now *returns to his lair trying to resist the urge to ask even more questions* EDIT 3: ok i know i know i said i would stop but i cant anyways: if the Gbaba have to send scout ships to each star system to check for emissions why not just flee for 20 years in hyper then start up a fully advance colony using all of the TF tech? the shear distance that they traveled should offer more than enough protection from an alien sensor system as any emissions from technology would be blotted out by the local stars emissions and if you are more or less on the other side of the galaxy then the gbaba they surely wont bother you i mean 20 years at 2500c would take you to the opposite end of the galaxy and if you are traveling at 5000c then you could very well just be in a nearby galaxy and in that case the gbaba won't ever find you because otherwise whenever they kill anyones civilization they would go and purge the WHOLE GALAXY of everyone which i think does not happen. TLDR: if they stayed in hyper even longer they could have just used as much tech as they want. |
Top |
Re: why stay in hyper for only 10 years? | |
---|---|
by Aethor » Wed May 27, 2015 4:36 pm | |
Aethor
Posts: 68
|
Eh, you do understand that the whole prologue with that escape and establishing a colony on Safehold is simply something to establish the story?
And that the main point of the story is abuse of religion and the effect of advancement of technology? The initial part you're talking about could have been made in a dozen of different ways, as long as it leads to establishing a colony that's set up in the same way. In fact, in the Dahak series, the last book, you will have the same kind of colony, which came to be in a somewhat different way. |
Top |
Re: why stay in hyper for only 10 years? | |
---|---|
by JeffEngel » Wed May 27, 2015 4:41 pm | |
JeffEngel
Posts: 2074
|
If the Terran Federation was safe til it went poking around some 100, 200 ly away from Earth, then 50,000 ly away is pretty certainly safe from the Gbaba. In this case though, 500 ly seems to be the distance: Pei Kau-yung gave a 500 year figure for the Gbaba to show up based on emissions if they would at all then gave another 50% wiggle room for timing Nimue's wake-up call. So that's a matter of what was considered enough. Why not pad enough far, far more? Well, you do have to worry about cryo pod maintenance; toleration of cryo by the colonists and whatever command crew was in cryo with them; ship maintenance; toleration of sheer time in hyperspace (it may be a factor), by ships, crew, and passengers; and the retention of the initial goals by the crew if they were decades away from the Terran Federation, humanity, and Operation Ark's planning stages. That can offer a lot of opportunity to go wrong - more time in hyper isn't free of risk or cost.
It's more confirmation that the Gbaba do not go looking, but just wait for visit or betraying emissions and go kill the source. As to finding a planet, if the 10 years delivered a 50,000 ly voyage (and I think that's off by 49,500 ly anyway), you could still bias your otherwise random vector to place you inside the Milky Way. You'd have to in order to avoid total silliness, after all. Alternatively, they may have had a very random route through hyperspace to cover only 500 ly in straight-line distance for 50,000 ly traveled, to make pursuit really, really stupidly difficult.
If they were killing based on visits or emissions, if the other alien civilization rose, emitted, and got killed, say, in 1900 A.D., Earth would have still been silent and beneath their notice. It would be a stupendous coincidence for that alien civilization (or their radio signals) to have reached the stars even that close to the time we did, and there's no reason to think they didn't die to the Gbaba thousands or tens of thousands of years earlier.
Yeah. Take that as an indication that there was a significant limit on the time they could spend in hyper - what, I don't know, but I sketched some possibilities above. One other point - the Gbaba wouldn't have to hit particular systems with scouts for emissions. Radio waves will travel, although they may degrade beyond the Gbaba's ability to make them out over the background noise before too terribly long. Safehold's location was apparently chosen as far enough out that the most Gbaba-paranoid sort would think that the Gbaba would never come there unless some emissions drew them there - and Langhorne at least wanted to be sure that no such emissions ever would, making Safehold a final destination rather than a bolthole to regroup and return. |
Top |
Re: why stay in hyper for only 10 years? | |
---|---|
by n7axw » Wed May 27, 2015 6:23 pm | |
n7axw
Posts: 5997
|
There is no such thing as completely risk free. No matter where Operation Ark fled or how long they stayed in hyper, there was always a risk that they would plant themselves on top of another alien race. Distance only helps against the known threat. Nothing but probability and chance can help against a threat you don't know to guard yourself against.
In fact, when Safehold goes looking for places to plant colony worlds, the same potential risk factors come into play. Don When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
|
Top |
Re: why stay in hyper for only 10 years? | |
---|---|
by SWM » Wed May 27, 2015 6:39 pm | |
SWM
Posts: 5928
|
Because they decided it was far enough. The Federation probably made some estimates on how far would be far enough to be safe. Then they did it again, with worst-case analysis. Then they tripled it. Then they tripled it again. Then the added some more, just to be certain. Then they let a pessimist add some more. It's far enough. --------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine |
Top |
Re: why stay in hyper for only 10 years? | |
---|---|
by captinjoehenry » Wed May 27, 2015 7:14 pm | |
captinjoehenry
Posts: 147
|
yeah i know and I love the series it is just that it is my habit to find logic holes in well everything and poke at them or if i feel there is a better way to do things i like to point it out but trust me I know what the series is about and i consider it one of the best if not the best series of books i have ever read. |
Top |
Re: why stay in hyper for only 10 years? | |
---|---|
by phillies » Thu May 28, 2015 9:17 am | |
phillies
Posts: 2077
|
Is there a source for 5000c as opposed to, e.g., 0.5c? 500 ly with multiple course changes in 10 y is, say, 100c or 200c.
|
Top |
Re: why stay in hyper for only 10 years? | |
---|---|
by captinjoehenry » Thu May 28, 2015 12:49 pm | |
captinjoehenry
Posts: 147
|
i am working off of the fact that they spent this 10 years in hyper space so they are traveling at at least 1c and based off the fact that the TF seems to have more advance tech then the Honorverse i am using the warship in the theta hyper band from the honorverse now i admit i should have said 3000c from relooking at the chart but that is in the scheme of things a small change. chart here: http://infodump.thefifthimperium.com/en ... ngton/95/1 |
Top |
Re: why stay in hyper for only 10 years? | |
---|---|
by Weird Harold » Thu May 28, 2015 12:57 pm | |
Weird Harold
Posts: 4478
|
That chart is for the Honorverse; there is zero evidence that it bears any relationship to Terran Federation Hyperdrives. .
. . Answers! I got lots of answers! (Now if I could just find the right questions.) |
Top |
Re: why stay in hyper for only 10 years? | |
---|---|
by captinjoehenry » Thu May 28, 2015 2:32 pm | |
captinjoehenry
Posts: 147
|
well that is true but i don't have anything else to go on and the TF has much more advanced tech than the honorverse as shown by its computers and having a hypercom but then again i could be totally wrong in my assumptions EDIT: BEHOLD THE TEXTEV: "First, Operation Ark's plan had required the colony fleet to remain in hyper for a minimum of ten years before even beginning to search for a new home world. That had carried it literally thousands of light years from the Federation..." (OAR pg 29 (trade paperback book)) underline added by me |
Top |