Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

Being Gbaba

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Being Gbaba
Post by ETathome   » Sat May 16, 2015 9:31 pm

ETathome
Ensign

Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2014 12:13 pm

I had a thought as well. It kind of follows what others have posted. What if the Gbaba are not curious at all. What if they learn new things from exposure of other species. If they are a predator species that can't innovate and the idea of peacefully co-existing is almost as foreign. Wouldn't the tech level be at the highest of societies they have destroyed?
Top
Re: Being Gbaba
Post by HamsterDesTodes   » Mon May 18, 2015 12:25 am

HamsterDesTodes
Ensign

Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 5:34 pm

ETathome wrote:I had a thought as well. It kind of follows what others have posted. What if the Gbaba are not curious at all. What if they learn new things from exposure of other species. If they are a predator species that can't innovate and the idea of peacefully co-existing is almost as foreign. Wouldn't the tech level be at the highest of societies they have destroyed?



If that's the case, how did they get off their first planet at all? Unlikely scenario IMHO.

My guess would be that there are no Gbaba.
They had a nice little civil war, with plenty of biological and nano warfare, while the space combat was either wholy or at the very least partial robotic. The biological/nano part wiped out all living Gbaba, and all thats left of them is said robotic war machine. Or perhaps even several different ones if their programming was restricted enough. "Defend system XYZ and pursue any attackers" or something similar could leave quite a few timebombs lying around. With wildely differing tech levels due to different combat damages during the civil war if we want to make things a bit more interesting for our intrepid safeholdian explorers to come *fg*.

If not even higher AIs survived, only tactical ones like OWL when he woke up, we would have an explanation why there's no technological improvements and why the Federation never managed to catch any Gbaba or even find any bodies.
Top
Re: Being Gbaba
Post by Bruno Behrends   » Mon May 18, 2015 1:49 am

Bruno Behrends
Captain of the List

Posts: 587
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:33 am
Location: Berlin

HamsterDesTodes wrote:
ETathome wrote:I had a thought as well. It kind of follows what others have posted. What if the Gbaba are not curious at all. What if they learn new things from exposure of other species. If they are a predator species that can't innovate and the idea of peacefully co-existing is almost as foreign. Wouldn't the tech level be at the highest of societies they have destroyed?



If that's the case, how did they get off their first planet at all? Unlikely scenario IMHO.

My guess would be that there are no Gbaba.
They had a nice little civil war, with plenty of biological and nano warfare, while the space combat was either wholy or at the very least partial robotic. The biological/nano part wiped out all living Gbaba, and all thats left of them is said robotic war machine. Or perhaps even several different ones if their programming was restricted enough. "Defend system XYZ and pursue any attackers" or something similar could leave quite a few timebombs lying around. With wildely differing tech levels due to different combat damages during the civil war if we want to make things a bit more interesting for our intrepid safeholdian explorers to come *fg*.

If not even higher AIs survived, only tactical ones like OWL when he woke up, we would have an explanation why there's no technological improvements and why the Federation never managed to catch any Gbaba or even find any bodies.


This explanation makes sense to me. Among the theories we have on this thread it requires the least number of assumptions IMO.

The drawback is that by the same token it's not really the most interesting one :D
Top
Re: Being Gbaba
Post by AirTech   » Mon May 18, 2015 2:02 am

AirTech
Captain of the List

Posts: 476
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:37 am
Location: Deeeep South (Australia) (most of the time...)

HamsterDesTodes wrote:
ETathome wrote:I had a thought as well. It kind of follows what others have posted. What if the Gbaba are not curious at all. What if they learn new things from exposure of other species. If they are a predator species that can't innovate and the idea of peacefully co-existing is almost as foreign. Wouldn't the tech level be at the highest of societies they have destroyed?



If that's the case, how did they get off their first planet at all? Unlikely scenario IMHO.

My guess would be that there are no Gbaba.
They had a nice little civil war, with plenty of biological and nano warfare, while the space combat was either wholy or at the very least partial robotic. The biological/nano part wiped out all living Gbaba, and all thats left of them is said robotic war machine. Or perhaps even several different ones if their programming was restricted enough. "Defend system XYZ and pursue any attackers" or something similar could leave quite a few timebombs lying around. With wildely differing tech levels due to different combat damages during the civil war if we want to make things a bit more interesting for our intrepid safeholdian explorers to come *fg*.

If not even higher AIs survived, only tactical ones like OWL when he woke up, we would have an explanation why there's no technological improvements and why the Federation never managed to catch any Gbaba or even find any bodies.


The other possibility is that they ate the inventors of their star ships, after they landed on their home planet. They don't know how they work but they do know how to tell the repair ships to make more copies... (Fleet landed on planet, took samples up to ships, samples ate samplers, Gbaba now have control but not understanding of systems. Sort of like a stone age man in a UFO.)
Top
Re: Being Gbaba
Post by ivoSF   » Sun May 24, 2015 2:57 pm

ivoSF
Midshipman

Posts: 3
Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 2:41 pm

some things i recall.

the gbaba atackes with no real regards for losses, they also have no regard for human prisoners, i think this shows something of their attitude.
throwing enough stuff at a problem until something brakes comes to mind.


it was said it was espected that the gbaba will eventualy expand until they meet safehold.

to me this give an idea of a slow but steady idealogy.

basicly
"if it aint broken dont fix it"
"quantity has a quality of its own"

since it works why chance it? repeat for a few milenia
Top
Re: Being Gbaba
Post by SWM   » Mon May 25, 2015 11:27 am

SWM
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5928
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: U.S. east coast

ivoSF wrote:some things i recall.

the gbaba atackes with no real regards for losses, they also have no regard for human prisoners, i think this shows something of their attitude.
throwing enough stuff at a problem until something brakes comes to mind.


it was said it was espected that the gbaba will eventualy expand until they meet safehold.

to me this give an idea of a slow but steady idealogy.

basicly
"if it aint broken dont fix it"
"quantity has a quality of its own"

since it works why chance it? repeat for a few milenia

Actually, the text does not give any evidence or hypothesis that the Gbaba are expanding. They may, in fact, be static in size as well as technology.
--------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine
Top
Re: Being Gbaba
Post by Bewildered   » Mon May 25, 2015 12:24 pm

Bewildered
Lieutenant (Junior Grade)

Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:35 am

Flawed logic - you're assuming procreation inversely correlates with life expectancy when a better link would be culture. First world nations are struggling to meet replenishment birth levels whilst third world nations with all their problems are growing. However traditional first world families tend to be larger, yet the wealthy of the third world, which live in better than the average standard of first worlders, have many children!

Also, as shown by western society, poverty isn't about hardship or the lack of essentials but relative lack compared to your wealthier neighbour. The fact that people in neighbouring countries are dying due to lack of food and water is irrelevant - they don't count.

Aside from all that, welcome to the forum :D
yatesps1 wrote:Long time lurker, first time poster in a while.
.
What if the Gbaba had a tremendous Antigerone breakthrough? Textev shows that the Terrans had extended life to approximately 3 centuries. That required continuous shots of nano, but still.
.
What if the Gbaba were a naturally long life species, say for multiple centuries. What if they then had some sort of breakthrough that enabled them to indefinitely extend that period. Maybe its gene therapy, nano-tech, cloning, or some combination therein. What if they lived forever, for lack of a better word. If the lives of average Gbaba were measured in hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of years. If indeed they had to die at all. If that were the case, the powers at the very top of the social structure would want to preserve the status quo. Even the average life of the average citizen would be pretty good.
.
If they had started out as a long lived species, then they would naturally have had a very low birth rate, because it wouldn't have needed to replenish its species. If such a species evolved with no natural predator, and a low birth rate, it would have a slow development cycle. Once it reached what the PTB considered a pinnacle of civilization, it would grind to a halt.
.
I imagine the GBaba were long lived, apex predators, with low birth rates. Who never suffered a mass extinction event. Once they had FTL travel and FTL communications, they probably didn't see any need to adapt further. Indeed, for the powers at the top of such a system, adaptation would threaten the power base of those rulers. Combine that with the very natural fear of AI uprising, and you have a stagnant society.
Top
Re: Being Gbaba
Post by USMA74   » Tue May 26, 2015 4:39 pm

USMA74
Commander

Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:22 am
Location: Leavenworth, KS, USA

If the Gbaba were good little AIs that are just obeying their programing, how are they different from Fred Saberhagen's Berserker series :?: I think our loveable author waddling after cellery to crunch is just a little more imaginative when it comes to the enemy primus.
Top
Re: Being Gbaba
Post by tinfoil   » Tue May 26, 2015 4:58 pm

tinfoil
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:30 pm

How about a bipolar culture similar to Niven's Puppeteers?

Faction A likes things to stay the same all of the time. Innovation is a Bad Thing.

Faction B is willing to adapt JUST AS FAR AS NECESSARY when external factors require 'just enough' innovation

Faction A is the 'default' state.


Way back then, predation / tribal wars / alien contact triggered societal innovation until the external factor was resolved (REMOVED). Then Faction A resumed its traditional reign.

BTW, the incidental extermination of humanity was not a big enough deal to shift control to Faction B. Faction A simply implemented Procedures to deal with a simple threat with a predefined Response.

So the pending Gbaba wars may look more like the 'Stars at War' bug wars once they get rolling.
Top
Re: Being Gbaba
Post by n7axw   » Tue May 26, 2015 10:45 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

tinfoil wrote:
So the pending Gbaba wars may look more like the 'Stars at War' bug wars once they get rolling.


This would make some sense. I don't visualise it happening until Safehold and its colony worlds is as big or bigger than the TF.

Then they could run into someone else as dangerous as the Gbaba... Wouldn't that make for an interesting twist of plot. :o

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top

Return to Safehold