Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests
Re: Being Gbaba | |
---|---|
by ETathome » Sat May 16, 2015 9:31 pm | |
ETathome
Posts: 12
|
I had a thought as well. It kind of follows what others have posted. What if the Gbaba are not curious at all. What if they learn new things from exposure of other species. If they are a predator species that can't innovate and the idea of peacefully co-existing is almost as foreign. Wouldn't the tech level be at the highest of societies they have destroyed?
|
Top |
Re: Being Gbaba | |
---|---|
by HamsterDesTodes » Mon May 18, 2015 12:25 am | |
HamsterDesTodes
Posts: 24
|
If that's the case, how did they get off their first planet at all? Unlikely scenario IMHO. My guess would be that there are no Gbaba. They had a nice little civil war, with plenty of biological and nano warfare, while the space combat was either wholy or at the very least partial robotic. The biological/nano part wiped out all living Gbaba, and all thats left of them is said robotic war machine. Or perhaps even several different ones if their programming was restricted enough. "Defend system XYZ and pursue any attackers" or something similar could leave quite a few timebombs lying around. With wildely differing tech levels due to different combat damages during the civil war if we want to make things a bit more interesting for our intrepid safeholdian explorers to come *fg*. If not even higher AIs survived, only tactical ones like OWL when he woke up, we would have an explanation why there's no technological improvements and why the Federation never managed to catch any Gbaba or even find any bodies. |
Top |
Re: Being Gbaba | |
---|---|
by Bruno Behrends » Mon May 18, 2015 1:49 am | |
Bruno Behrends
Posts: 587
|
This explanation makes sense to me. Among the theories we have on this thread it requires the least number of assumptions IMO. The drawback is that by the same token it's not really the most interesting one |
Top |
Re: Being Gbaba | |
---|---|
by AirTech » Mon May 18, 2015 2:02 am | |
AirTech
Posts: 476
|
The other possibility is that they ate the inventors of their star ships, after they landed on their home planet. They don't know how they work but they do know how to tell the repair ships to make more copies... (Fleet landed on planet, took samples up to ships, samples ate samplers, Gbaba now have control but not understanding of systems. Sort of like a stone age man in a UFO.) |
Top |
Re: Being Gbaba | |
---|---|
by ivoSF » Sun May 24, 2015 2:57 pm | |
ivoSF
Posts: 3
|
some things i recall.
the gbaba atackes with no real regards for losses, they also have no regard for human prisoners, i think this shows something of their attitude. throwing enough stuff at a problem until something brakes comes to mind. it was said it was espected that the gbaba will eventualy expand until they meet safehold. to me this give an idea of a slow but steady idealogy. basicly "if it aint broken dont fix it" "quantity has a quality of its own" since it works why chance it? repeat for a few milenia |
Top |
Re: Being Gbaba | |
---|---|
by SWM » Mon May 25, 2015 11:27 am | |
SWM
Posts: 5928
|
Actually, the text does not give any evidence or hypothesis that the Gbaba are expanding. They may, in fact, be static in size as well as technology. --------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine |
Top |
Re: Being Gbaba | |
---|---|
by Bewildered » Mon May 25, 2015 12:24 pm | |
Bewildered
Posts: 33
|
Flawed logic - you're assuming procreation inversely correlates with life expectancy when a better link would be culture. First world nations are struggling to meet replenishment birth levels whilst third world nations with all their problems are growing. However traditional first world families tend to be larger, yet the wealthy of the third world, which live in better than the average standard of first worlders, have many children!
Also, as shown by western society, poverty isn't about hardship or the lack of essentials but relative lack compared to your wealthier neighbour. The fact that people in neighbouring countries are dying due to lack of food and water is irrelevant - they don't count. Aside from all that, welcome to the forum
|
Top |
Re: Being Gbaba | |
---|---|
by USMA74 » Tue May 26, 2015 4:39 pm | |
USMA74
Posts: 238
|
If the Gbaba were good little AIs that are just obeying their programing, how are they different from Fred Saberhagen's Berserker series I think our loveable author waddling after cellery to crunch is just a little more imaginative when it comes to the enemy primus.
|
Top |
Re: Being Gbaba | |
---|---|
by tinfoil » Tue May 26, 2015 4:58 pm | |
tinfoil
Posts: 77
|
How about a bipolar culture similar to Niven's Puppeteers?
Faction A likes things to stay the same all of the time. Innovation is a Bad Thing. Faction B is willing to adapt JUST AS FAR AS NECESSARY when external factors require 'just enough' innovation Faction A is the 'default' state. Way back then, predation / tribal wars / alien contact triggered societal innovation until the external factor was resolved (REMOVED). Then Faction A resumed its traditional reign. BTW, the incidental extermination of humanity was not a big enough deal to shift control to Faction B. Faction A simply implemented Procedures to deal with a simple threat with a predefined Response. So the pending Gbaba wars may look more like the 'Stars at War' bug wars once they get rolling. |
Top |
Re: Being Gbaba | |
---|---|
by n7axw » Tue May 26, 2015 10:45 pm | |
n7axw
Posts: 5997
|
This would make some sense. I don't visualise it happening until Safehold and its colony worlds is as big or bigger than the TF. Then they could run into someone else as dangerous as the Gbaba... Wouldn't that make for an interesting twist of plot. Don When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
|
Top |