Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests

HMS-Fearless, CA-New

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: HMS-Fearless, CA-New
Post by George J. Smith   » Thu Apr 30, 2015 4:55 am

George J. Smith
Commodore

Posts: 873
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:48 am
Location: Ross-on-Wye UK

SharkHunter wrote:
Dauntless wrote:if they are still alive. the first war, Thunderbolt and Battle of Manticore (or should that be first Manticore?) wiped out a lot of good people BoM espcially.

I was so upset when Alistair and Banshee died. was worse then Rastar in We Few and that hurt so much!

There has to be someone left who would be worthy but apart from Abigial i'm stumped as to who. they are all too senior, if alive.

really that should have been Rafe cardones first command instead of werewolf. or Scotty Tremaine's once he left the LACs
That said, Tremaine is a cruiser captain right now. You don't think he'd jump ship to Fearless III in a heartbeat? I would just to honor my and HH's battle dead.


I think that would a hard call for him as he commands his Cruiser Squadron from HMS Alistair McKeon.
Last edited by George J. Smith on Thu Apr 30, 2015 1:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
.
T&R
GJS

A man should live forever, or die in the attempt
Spider Robinson Callahan's Crosstime Saloon (1977) A voice is heard in Ramah
Top
Re: HMS-Fearless, CA-New
Post by Vince   » Thu Apr 30, 2015 11:22 am

Vince
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:43 pm

George J. Smith wrote:I think that would a hard call for him as he commands his Cruiser Squadron from HMS Alistair McEwan.

Quibble: Cruiser division, not squadron. Admiral Henke speaking to Commodore Terekhov:
Shadow of Freedom, Chapter 26 wrote:“I’ll want you underway within twelve hours,” she continued. “In the meantime, I’ll be leaving your other division and Scotty Tremaine’s division here in Montana, along with the rest of Culbertson’s CLACs, and the rest of our destroyers, all under Culbertson. I’ll leave him detailed instructions about what to do if any interesting little messages should happen to arrive from other resistance movements we didn’t realize we were supporting.”
Boldface is my emphasis.
-------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes.
Top
Re: HMS-Fearless, CA-New
Post by George J. Smith   » Thu Apr 30, 2015 1:24 pm

George J. Smith
Commodore

Posts: 873
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:48 am
Location: Ross-on-Wye UK

Vince wrote:
George J. Smith wrote:I think that would a hard call for him as he commands his Cruiser Squadron from HMS Alistair McEwan.

Quibble: Cruiser division, not squadron. Admiral Henke speaking to Commodore Terekhov:
Shadow of Freedom, Chapter 26 wrote:“I’ll want you underway within twelve hours,” she continued. “In the meantime, I’ll be leaving your other division and Scotty Tremaine’s division here in Montana, along with the rest of Culbertson’s CLACs, and the rest of our destroyers, all under Culbertson. I’ll leave him detailed instructions about what to do if any interesting little messages should happen to arrive from other resistance movements we didn’t realize we were supporting.”
Boldface is my emphasis.


My bad, I knew he had Alistair McKeon as a flag but I didn't check to see if it was a squadron or a division.
.
T&R
GJS

A man should live forever, or die in the attempt
Spider Robinson Callahan's Crosstime Saloon (1977) A voice is heard in Ramah
Top
Re: HMS-Fearless, CA-New
Post by akira.taylor   » Thu Apr 30, 2015 4:07 pm

akira.taylor
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:28 pm

SharkHunter wrote:So, if because it's a Ship of the List, the RMN always has a Nike, and traditionally it's the standard-bearer for the battle cruiser class... CA-286 is completely obsolete by PD 1922 standards...

So, where's Ship of the List, HMS Fearless III? is it a Sag-C? Not on anyone's radar? or just keep it with CA-286, retired for honorary purposes like HMS Courageous, or...

I think we should let Honor, Tremaine, Sonja, and Foraker get together for a design confab, maybe built just in time for a certain rapidly progressing Grayson-born RMN officer to take command, and do the ship justice.

Thoughts?

[by the way... tried to look up something like this on previous threads... never came up with an effective enough search!]


My understanding is there are Ships of the List (there is always a ship of the name, although it might not be finished yet - CA Fearless was under construction when Honor got it), and then there is Nike (always the newest, best battlecruiser).

So, the current Fearless is around somewhere (unless a new one was under construction during Yawata).
Top
Re: HMS-Fearless, CA-New
Post by saber964   » Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:21 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

Scotty, is on the fast track, more than likely he'll be commanding a CruRon before long. Likely the rest of CruRon96.
Top
Re: HMS-Fearless, CA-New
Post by stewart   » Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:25 pm

stewart
Captain of the List

Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 10:54 pm
Location: Southern California, USA

Dauntless wrote:yes indeed. that was a big leap. talk about tonnage creep!



--------------------

It happens in multiple navies

the original Enterprise was a Revolutionary Sloop of War. By the time of the TR's Great White Fleet, the name was assigned to an armored cruiser (ACR). Last two Enterprises were CV6 and CVN65.

In most cases the tonnage / size creep goes up

-- Stewart
Top
Re: HMS-Fearless, CA-New
Post by Jonathan_S   » Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:44 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8797
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

stewart wrote:
Dauntless wrote:yes indeed. that was a big leap. talk about tonnage creep!



--------------------

It happens in multiple navies

the original Enterprise was a Revolutionary Sloop of War. By the time of the TR's Great White Fleet, the name was assigned to an armored cruiser (ACR). Last two Enterprises were CV6 and CVN65.

In most cases the tonnage / size creep goes up

-- Stewart

Most cases.
But I was looking through the ships of the Royal Navy's Type-45 Detroyers, and a previous HMS Duncan was the lead ship of a turn of the century pre-dreadnaught class of battleships; and the one before that was a screw powered 101-gun 1st rate ship of the line.

Even an 8k ton destroyer is a serious step down in displacement from a pre-dread.


A couple other Type-45s share names with interwar light cruisers; but the Diane class of CLs displace less than 60% of what the modern air defense destroyer does. So it's a step down in class, but step up in tonnage...
Top
Re: HMS-Fearless, CA-New
Post by saber964   » Fri May 01, 2015 4:49 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

stewart wrote:
Dauntless wrote:yes indeed. that was a big leap. talk about tonnage creep!



--------------------

It happens in multiple navies

the original Enterprise was a Revolutionary Sloop of War. By the time of the TR's Great White Fleet, the name was assigned to an armored cruiser (ACR). Last two Enterprises were CV6 and CVN65.

In most cases the tonnage / size creep goes up

-- Stewart


Let's not forget PCU Enterprise CVN80.
Top
Re: HMS-Fearless, CA-New
Post by saber964   » Fri May 01, 2015 4:58 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

If you want tonnage creep look at destroyers. During WWI a destroyer weighed 9-1100 tons, WWII 18-2200 tons Cold War 4-8000 tons and the Zumwalt class is 14000 tons as big as a WWII Cleveland class light cruiser and bigger than any of the Treaty Cruisers of the era.
Top
Re: HMS-Fearless, CA-New
Post by stewart   » Sun May 03, 2015 11:44 pm

stewart
Captain of the List

Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 10:54 pm
Location: Southern California, USA

saber964 wrote:"stewart"]"Dauntless"]yes indeed. that was a big leap. talk about tonnage creep!



--------------------

It happens in multiple navies

the original Enterprise was a Revolutionary Sloop of War. By the time of the TR's Great White Fleet, the name was assigned to an armored cruiser (ACR). Last two Enterprises were CV6 and CVN65.

In most cases the tonnage / size creep goes up

-- Stewart[/quote]

Let's not forget PCU Enterprise CVN80.[/quote]


------------

That I won't -- 2 tours on CVN65 -- 80-83 and 89-92

-- Stewart
Top

Return to Honorverse