Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests
Chisholm | |
---|---|
by Iorwerth » Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:10 pm | |
Iorwerth
Posts: 22
|
Hello
I have question (query) about Chisholm. In the books Chisholm has a strong army but a relatively weaker navy. This works in story terms, as it fits well with Charis' strong navy but relatively weaker army. It has however always struck me as a little odd as Chisholm geographically appears almost as isolated as Charis, Corisande and Emerald. I wonder who the Chisholm army was developed to fight, where did they learn to be so effective and why did Chisholm prioritise army over their navy when they are geographically isolated from the other major mainland powers? Have I missed something? Iorwerth --------------------
yma o hyd Cymru am byth |
Top |
Re: Chisholm | |
---|---|
by SHV » Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:25 pm | |
SHV
Posts: 50
|
The development of a strong national army was the means by which the marginalized Royal family re-exerted control over the Nobility.
Steve |
Top |
Re: Chisholm | |
---|---|
by SYED » Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:45 pm | |
SYED
Posts: 1345
|
CHaris supplies the navy, chrisholm gives the army, i wonder who will supply the coast guard.
|
Top |
Re: Chisholm | |
---|---|
by SWM » Wed Apr 29, 2015 6:07 pm | |
SWM
Posts: 5928
|
Tarot. --------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine |
Top |
Re: Chisholm | |
---|---|
by Iorwerth » Thu Apr 30, 2015 2:31 am | |
Iorwerth
Posts: 22
|
Only the Anvil, Emerald, Charis and thousands of miles of sea between Chisholm and Tarot. Given that Chisholm is the next best thing to an island and quite isolated you would have thought (?) that naturally they be a naval power. --------------------
yma o hyd Cymru am byth |
Top |
Re: Chisholm | |
---|---|
by Randomiser » Thu Apr 30, 2015 6:25 am | |
Randomiser
Posts: 1452
|
Well, they were to some extent. That is why the CoGA co-opted their navy into the attack on Charis in OAR. However they are much less industrialised and mercantile than Charis so had less need for a merchant fleet and the ability to protect it on the seas. Charis' navy was just much bigger. The nobility on Chisolm seem to have focussed on struggles with each other and especially with the Crown rather than overseas matters, so military power on land was what was wanted and valued. As SHV posted, the royal army seen in the books was developed by the Crown to wrest power back from the nobles and to keep them in order. Also Howell Bay's strategic position in Charis' history predisposed the kings of Charis to focus on ships. There was no similar reason for the kings of Chisholm to do so. |
Top |
Re: Chisholm | |
---|---|
by JeffEngel » Thu Apr 30, 2015 7:11 am | |
JeffEngel
Posts: 2074
|
Right. Getting stuff and going places on Charis calls for water transport, across a bay, across a channel, sometimes across an ocean. Getting stuff and going places on Chisholm requires crossing Chisholm. Oh, you have to watch the coasts and the ocean is an alternative for getting about Chisholm's perimeter; when Trellheim gets cheeky, you need a navy to discourage them; and there will be some trade with other islands and cheekiness out of them to handle. But for the most part, Chisholm's problems, challenges, and opportunities have been accessible on foot. |
Top |
Re: Chisholm | |
---|---|
by Isilith » Thu Apr 30, 2015 1:20 pm | |
Isilith
Posts: 310
|
The Empire needs to annex Trellheim, along with a lot of other places. |
Top |
Re: Chisholm | |
---|---|
by Randomiser » Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:32 pm | |
Randomiser
Posts: 1452
|
Anything's possible , I suppose. One day. But right now they are not bothering anybody in EoC so why waste resources on them? |
Top |
Re: Chisholm | |
---|---|
by SYED » Fri May 01, 2015 7:53 pm | |
SYED
Posts: 1345
|
Sinmce there is no true centrol authority in trellheim, i can see them establishing their own enclaves in those territiories, and gradually become hte main power over there.
|
Top |