Weird Harold wrote:Kytheros wrote:A single broadside arrangement has no real benefit, and has several real downsides.
With the "off-bore" capability newer RMN missiles have, a single broadside arrangement is feasible. The Roland already makes routine use of the capability to fire twelve missile salvos instead of crossing its own "T" to fire its chase-only missile arrangement.
Off-bore isn't "shoot 180 degrees behind you". It is, IIRC, about a 270 degree total arc - or about 135 degrees to one side.
The Roland can only use both chase clusters when a normal ship (without off-bore capability) would be using broadside tubes. If you're in the chase arcs, a Roland can only use the cluster in that hammerhead against you.
Also, as I said earlier, a single broadside arrange is fewer total tubes, a lot less damage resistant, and a lot less tactically flexible. The downsides far outweigh whatever theoretical benefits it might or might not have.
I think the next generation of long-term viability Light Combatant - whatever you decide to call it depends on how small the lightspeed-only, Keyhole-lite is, and what's the minimum to carry it.
If it's small enough, the Next Gen light combatant might well be something a lot like a Sag-C with Keyhole 1/2 and a Streak Drive, although it'll probably sacrifice 5-10 missile tubes per broadside to fit the Keyhole module, and might have to give up some broadside energy mounts too. Call that a Destroyer/Light Cruiser (L). Any crew savings from the weapons reductions get retained (perhaps optionally so, or only for independent cruises, not as part of a larger tactical force) for the extra warm bodies for damage control and boarding parties.
The Destroyer and Light Cruiser roles might very well wind up getting merged into one class, due to the size and tonnage creep caused by the need for survivability. This may cause the destroyer to go the way of the frigate.
"Unarmored" and "lightly armored" are relative terms in this era of warhead destructiveness creep - the Peeps (and then Havenites) went with heavier warheads so that each hit they got hurt more because they had lower hit rates than Manticore. Currently, the Manticoran Mark-16G is as powerful, if not more powerful, than a prewar capital ship missile, in addition to sidewall upgrades. Everybody else is going to need to upgrade their laserhead destructiveness as well - and by a lot - which, probably won't be extremely difficult or complicated.
The Next Gen Heavy Cruiser(L) might well be in the 800kt range - Keyhole 1/2, Streak Drive, 20-25 tube broadsides, extensive automation, but retaining crew and marine support capacity - that is, have the capacity to fight the ship efficiently while having detached crew and marines as boarding parties/prize crews/ground support, and possibly a return to a larger Marine complement, or at least the capacity for a larger Marine complement, even if it "normally" or in fleet ops will carry fewer.
It might be that, thanks to automation and other crew reduction technologies, Manticore will be able to carry the large Marine complements of its pre-automation design styles, as 'passengers', or those with fewer ship operation duties than it does currently. Or perhaps there will be a "dedicated Marine complement" that's integrated and conforms to past and current RMN practice, and provision for separate "Marine complements" that are more akin to a subset of specially trained Army-units-on-ships without ship-operation duties (which is/was said to be the practice for most everybody else). There would probably need to be nomenclature changes, in the latter event, though.