Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests
Re: Oops | |
---|---|
by n7axw » Sun Apr 26, 2015 9:56 pm | |
n7axw
Posts: 5997
|
The thing that I've wondered about is why SS was so poor with its computer security. On Tepes, Harkness was able to slice into its systems with only minimal trouble, although it has to be remembered that he did get some help from those goons who were supposed to be watching him.
In Forackers case at Lovat with those SS ships watching the PN, there is no way that input from PN sourses should even have been possible. The PN was the "enemy" according to SS institutional paranoia. But institutional paranoia apparently did not translate over into the area of competence with computer security. What happened was almost the equivalent of having the Mantys hack the systems of PN warships At the beginning of a battle. Don When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
|
Top |
Re: Oops | |
---|---|
by cthia » Sun Apr 26, 2015 10:48 pm | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
StateSec picked officers more for their lack of a political or naval threat to them, for a lack of ambition. Actual capability seemed to be relegated to the backseat driver. If they were shooting their best people on-ship, I imagine they were shooting their groundside threats as well. They were eliminating their best officers. I see no reason Just/Pierre didn't apply that tactic across the board, eliminating their best - especially if familially tied to targeted officers. Also, the tech weenies, who may have seemed a bit too... ambitious. And it goes to reason, that if families were also shot, then the tech gurus were on the side of the real Navy - therefore were not so... forthcoming with their best work. Where was the motivation? My point is that the cream of the crop across the board were afiliated with the Navy, not StateSec. Besides, how can one protect a system against the best tech guru the Navy has, civilian or military? Foraker has no Haven counterpart. Her skills may actually exceed that of Hemphill's. Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: Oops | |
---|---|
by Kytheros » Sun Apr 26, 2015 11:17 pm | |
Kytheros
Posts: 1407
|
A good part of the weakness is the Peep educational system, or lack thereof. When most of the people doing your code have minimal education, your code is gonna suck. As far as being able to get in - the SS ships were assigned to the fleet, in lieu of additional regular PN superdreadnoughts, not simply as watchdogs. As such, they would have needed to be coordinated with the rest of the fleet, per the fleet flag's orders. Therefore, while most communications channels would likely be closed, they would have needed to accept communications from the flag staff. Plus, they would have had access to the StateSec files on Tourville's staff - and Foraker would have been listed as a non-threat, being too buried in her job to take notice of politics. Think of the StateSec SD's as being a bit like Nazi Germany's SS combat units, at least in the earlier days of the War, before their major expansions. If/When assigned to regular Army operations or operations being run by the regular Army, they'd've taken orders from the Army CO's in charge of the operation, for that operation. It's not exactly the best analogy, but indications from the books are that StateSec was at least starting to head in that direction. |
Top |
Re: Oops | |
---|---|
by Shannon_Foraker » Mon Mar 07, 2022 1:05 am | |
Shannon_Foraker
Posts: 197
|
My headcanon is that Shannon did some IT support for SS, who accepted it, as while Shannon wasn't good politically, she was tech-wise, and sometimes you need a tech wiz to fix your computer. |
Top |
Re: Oops | |
---|---|
by tlb » Mon Mar 07, 2022 2:52 pm | |
tlb
Posts: 4437
|
When I originally read that there were destruct mechanisms planted during refit in the State Sec ships, that were to be used against Torch; I was thinking actual bombs. However with To End in Fire, we now see the sort of software destruction possible; whether with background modules or patches to existing code. The Oops ships had been ordered to be a part of the Twelfth Fleet, which would have included allowing Shannon to download operation plans. |
Top |
Re: Oops | |
---|---|
by Louis R » Mon Mar 07, 2022 4:06 pm | |
Louis R
Posts: 1298
|
By this point, Shannon would probably not only have heard what Harkness did to Tepes [I doubt that there was much effort made to conceal it, even if it wasn't spelled out on the PMV citation], but worked out exactly what he'd bypassed to make it happen. And the tactical system is going to reach much deeper inside the net that the "games computer" ever did. As well as having direct communications with the most powerful explosive devices on the ship.
|
Top |
Re: Oops | |
---|---|
by tlb » Mon Mar 07, 2022 4:21 pm | |
tlb
Posts: 4437
|
The problem with that is Harkness caused many problems with software; but his actual destruction of Tepes required a hardware component: cutting the external sensors in the pinnace, so that it would think it was okay to bring up its wedge within the boat bay. So I expect that Shannon's solution was much closer to what was planned for the ships tasked to attack Torch. |
Top |
Re: Oops | |
---|---|
by Loren Pechtel » Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:48 pm | |
Loren Pechtel
Posts: 1324
|
He shouldn't have been able to pull that off, period. It's some pretty sloppy design for a failure of that type to be possible. Even on a warship you engineer things to fail safe, not fail deadly. However, we have seen a perfectly good way the Oops could have been pulled--turning off the fusion bottle containment. |
Top |
Re: Oops | |
---|---|
by tlb » Mon Mar 07, 2022 11:59 pm | |
tlb
Posts: 4437
|
I think people with evil intentions could have managed to trick the sensors, despite failure safeguards. For example replacing the sensor feed with a recording of the main ship's external sensors. The more layers of protection that you add, the greater the probability that a minor problem would keep the pinnace from working when needed. Given the level of maintenance ability in the People's Navy, you have to take a chance at some point. |
Top |
Re: Oops | |
---|---|
by Shannon_Foraker » Tue Mar 08, 2022 10:54 am | |
Shannon_Foraker
Posts: 197
|
I think the last line is very true. My ideas on how Oops happened #1 Reactor Failure My highlights are in bold.
The description of how "Oops" happened, with the fusion bottle failing, makes me suspicious.
Someone like Shannon should have no problem getting access beyond the amount she's supposed to have, despite the fail-safes. Harkness hacked Tepes with a hand computer. Shannon has a tac station and more time (I belive the trip to Hades was roughly a month, and end of IEH, according to the wiki is c. 1911 PD (December), and end of AoV (Oops is one of the last things in it) is c. 1915 PD (May)). Shannon is so good with tech that she should be able to hack PN software security from her tac station. Remember, by 1918-1920, she had been set to Bolthole, and in her chat with Theisman, she mentions likely having been out there since 1915 or 1916 at the latest, based on the dates of the books in the timeline. She's also a Vice Admiral. In my headcanon, Shannon gets some ship command time, either by being called away from Bolthole sometimes, or in very late 1915 to 1916, or by sent to Bolthole later than most people, as otherwise she would be be out of her skills with people management. This also gives her an reason to be promoted to flag rank. And remember Honor's chat with Benjamin? Expensive project with Shannon in charge makes Honor worried.
|
Top |