BobG wrote:PeterZ wrote:I don't believe I am over estimating that at all. Because it is certain God created the CoGA. He is perfect. His creation is perfect. Man is imperfect. Where God cannot fail, man can.
The theology will invariably point to the men of the CoGA as having failed, not the Church He created. Because the alternative is that God did indeed create a monstrosity. If an omniscient God created such a vile institution He is not worth following.
Of the two options, the former is easier to accept but more than a few will conclude the latter. I agree the CoGA will not be universally accepted as enshrined by the Writ. It will still represent the vast majority of Safehold.
Actually, the Archangels, who are known to be imperfect, created the Church of God Awaiting. They said they did it at God's direction, but did they get it right? Some irony in that POV, anyway.
I think that when the surviving CoGA soldiers return home, and relate what they have seen and what they have done, they will see the CoGA and the Archangels in a whole new light. And not such a good one.
If there are competing faiths, such as the CoC, I think that people may start to think about alternatives. And the CoC's emphasis on one's
personal relationship with God may well be a lot more attractive than working though imperfect Priests.
-- Bob G
Right. If the CoGA - as it has ended up in the Year of God Awaiting 897 - is clearly not keeping God's approval, there remain a lot of options for resolving the difficulty:
1 - The CoGA remains utterly in the right, and so long as one believer somewhere in hiding in Harchong still believes, this is all a test.
2 - The CoGA went wrong in the hands of men - God's perfect gift was squandered.
3 - The CoGA went wrong in the hands of Archangels (pick one or more) - God's perfect gift was lost in transmission through their error and/or sin.
4 - The Writ, in its account transmitted by Archangels, was wrong, and the CoGA never was God's perfect gift. Maybe it was an imperfect gift of imperfect but benevolent Archangels; maybe it was wrecked with the Fall and the Writ covered that up, who knows.
5 - The Writ was even more wrong than that - watch this space for further revelation.
(1) represents sheer fanaticism. I don't think that's unknown on Safehold, or anywhere else, but it's by no means universal either.
(2) or (3) leave reformation of the Church as a live option, but also leave how much reform, of what sort, entirely open. The Church of Charis would be one entirely valid option. There would be very little in the Writ - essentially just the "historical" account of creation and all the real-world-confirmable instructions of Pasquale, Truscott, Sondheim, et al - that would be fixed. It's choose-your-own-theology for the rest.
(4) and (5) open up the Writ accounts to direct questioning, rather than more-or-less radical reinterpretation. If you read the Writ so that the Church is inherently, irrevocably perfect
and you notice that the Church is a monster, then you're committed to supposing the Writ is in error. Just because of that conclusion, I doubt many people will accept both premises, but if you suppose the Writ does not assure a forever perfect Church, you've got to account for how it went wrong. If you accept archangelic fallibility - which is the Writ account of how Shan-wei went bad already - then the door is open for Langhorne, Bedard, Schueler, Chihoro, and the rest to be wrong or mistaken too.
At that point, the Writ itself justifies taking its claims as potentially in error and it's time to consider them in the light of all evidence available. That's a big and disturbing change, but it's not quite a logic bomb that ends all rational thought.