Bill Woods wrote:Hasek wrote:there's a sphere around each terminus where its faster to go thru the junction then direct. This is what make the penetration so large. depending on where your going that sphere could be hundreds of LY in diameter
It's not really a matter of spheres, because if it's a shorter distance to a destination through the wormhole than going direct, there's no system farther out in that direction for which that would not also be true.
For instance, if you're going from Beowulf to a system on the other side of Manticore, use the wormhole to skip over the first 475 ltyr. On this side of Manticore, if you're going to a system 250 ltyr in that direction, use the wormhole and drive 225 ltyr back. But if you're going to a system only 200 ltyr in that direction, go straight there.
Right. It's more that there's a cone (or maybe a hemispherical cone) pointed towards the other end of the wormhole. If you're starting from "beyond" terminus A and heading "beyond" terminus B then it doesn't matter how long the trip is, the wormhole always makes it shorter.
But if you're starting far enough off to a side, or from a point between the two termini, the detour (or backtracking) to use the wormhole might be at least as long as the distance saved by using it.
Although the actual economic cut-off distance is likely to be one on side or the other of the pure travel distance line; because of other factors. A few off the top of my head:
* wormhole fees might make it worth taking slightly longer travel time to skip them
* conversely ability to pick-up or drop off cargo at terminus warehouses for transhipment might make it worth using the wormhole even if the total distance is longer.
* or if there are a couple decent, but not great, trade stops on the long route that again might encourage you to skip the wormhole as they might more than cover your costs.