Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

Hot Air and the start of Flight

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Hot Air and the start of Flight
Post by n7axw   » Mon Feb 02, 2015 3:43 am

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

fallsfromtrees wrote:
And you are going to power it how?


With one Thirsk's crank propellers??? :lol:

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Hot Air and the start of Flight
Post by Keith_w   » Mon Feb 02, 2015 7:47 am

Keith_w
Commodore

Posts: 976
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:10 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

fallsfromtrees wrote:
anwi wrote:Well, I haven't read any convincing arguments as to why the EoC should go down that route now or in the near future.
Dilandu wrote:There was a lot of them.

anwi wrote:For a start, they probably still haven't officially discovered hydrogen. If they have, how to produce it in quantities without electricity?

Dilandu wrote:Simple chemistry. Sulfuric acid on iron filling.

anwi wrote:If you could do the latter, how to store it without large losses? Transport to the frontlines is an issue as well.

Dilandu wrote:Frontline gas generators, as in US Civil War in 1860th
anwi wrote:Finally, the Zeppelin or blimp type vessels discussed so far require quite some effort, although they might be viable with Safehold materials.

Dilandu wrote:Their cost would be mo more than 1/20-1/10 of KH's

AirTech wrote:You could of course skip the lot and start making Piper Cubs (the full drawing sets are available on the internet). (Next question is do you build E-2's, J-3's, L-4's, L-14's, L-18's, L-21's, U-7's, PA-11's,PA-18's or PA-19's (or TG-8's, or Cubby's) to start with....) A Cub is much harder to hit than a balloon and can carry serious teeth (3" rockets are nothing to laugh at).

And you are going to power it how?


Rubber Bands, they gots lots and lots of Big Rubber Bands.
--
A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
Top
Re: Hot Air and the start of Flight
Post by n7axw   » Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:21 am

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

I think we all need another snippet... ;)

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Hot Air and the start of Flight
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:31 am

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1960
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

n7axw wrote:I think we all need another snippet... ;)

Don

Definitely feels like SDS is setting in.
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top
Re: Hot Air and the start of Flight
Post by AirTech   » Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:48 pm

AirTech
Captain of the List

Posts: 476
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:37 am
Location: Deeeep South (Australia) (most of the time...)

n7axw wrote:
fallsfromtrees wrote:
And you are going to power it how?


With one Thirsk's crank propellers??? :lol:

Don


The Piper Cub E-2 managed to get airborne with a 35hp engine. A steam power plant should be able to deliver this output (and similar sizes steam aeroengines were built and flown (http://wow-really.blogspot.com.au/2007/ ... flies.html)(http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/051752.pdf)). A condenser to capture the water in the exhaust would help with its problems) (Or just build a small diesel engine - could be used in small tractors too). (35HP is what the VW Beetle puts out in stock condition).
A Piper Cub TG-8 is a three place glider (3 pilots actually), and as such has no power plant - and 95% parts compatibility with the Piper Observer O-58/ Grasshopper L-4 / Cub J-3 (most of them were converted to powered aircraft after the war). The Piper XLNP-1 was a glide bomb with a 900lb warhead built from a TG-8 (a 1800lb warhead version was cancelled).
This compares with the multiple 150hp plus engines fitted to the Zeppelin companies products and no hydrogen gas bags. (More (or possibly less) bang for your buck).
Short range matters less for a plane that flies from just behind your lines to just behind your opponents....
Top
Re: Hot Air and the start of Flight
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:44 pm

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1960
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

fallsfromtrees wrote:
And you are going to power it how?

n7axw wrote:With one Thirsk's crank propellers??? :lol:

Don
AirTech wrote:
The Piper Cub E-2 managed to get airborne with a 35hp engine. A steam power plant should be able to deliver this output (and similar sizes steam aeroengines were built and flown (http://wow-really.blogspot.com.au/2007/ ... flies.html)(http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/051752.pdf)). A condenser to capture the water in the exhaust would help with its problems) (Or just build a small diesel engine - could be used in small tractors too). (35HP is what the VW Beetle puts out in stock condition).
A Piper Cub TG-8 is a three place glider (3 pilots actually), and as such has no power plant - and 95% parts compatibility with the Piper Observer O-58/ Grasshopper L-4 / Cub J-3 (most of them were converted to powered aircraft after the war). The Piper XLNP-1 was a glide bomb with a 900lb warhead built from a TG-8 (a 1800lb warhead version was cancelled).
This compares with the multiple 150hp plus engines fitted to the Zeppelin companies products and no hydrogen gas bags. (More (or possibly less) bang for your buck).
Short range matters less for a plane that flies from just behind your lines to just behind your opponents....

IC engines until after the CoGA is overthrown are a no-no. To much danger of convincing Joe Peasant that you really are worshiping Shan-Wei. You can't afford that at this time.
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top
Re: Hot Air and the Start of Flight.
Post by Larry   » Tue Feb 03, 2015 12:24 am

Larry
Lieutenant Commander

Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 3:12 pm

fallsfromtrees wrote:
IC engines until after the CoGA is overthrown are a no-no. To much danger of convincing Joe Peasant that you really are worshiping Shan-Wei. You can't afford that at this time.


Well hopefully I edited the quote train properly!
In any case, the problem with an Internal Combustion Engine isn't the peasants. It will be the bloody great rock falling from the sky.
An internal combustion engine is a wonderful electromagnetic noise source. Couple an immensely detectable spark gap transmitter (which is what an ICE is) with a regular frequency beat (the RPM rate of the engine) in a localized location (And what satellite constellation can't do triangulation) and even the dumbest, most poorly programmed, NO Tech allowed, computer program is going to react. Nope, worries about peasant reactions are not the problem at that point. Precision guided kinetic kill strikes, however, are a cat of an entirely different color. This is why I argued for diesel engines in a previous post train here on the forum. Diesels are heat engines only. Simple compression. MUCH less detectable than an ICE, and for that matter far more compact, I would argue, than a steam engine of comparable output power. If I recall though, the general consensuses was that the machining capability was not yet up to producing the parts. Not sure I agreed, but that's what I recall. Also the need for precision types of alloys was the other argument against, again if my memory is correct. And again I'm not sure I agree.
ON the other hand I do recognize that Safehold's grasp of chemistry is still very weak, so the grasp on precision metallurgy may also be weak. Without demand (Which I doubt there's been till Charis started it's industrialization phase) metals such as chromium, manganese, boron, etc. simply may not have been in demand, mined, or produced in any quantity. Indeed it's possible no one even recognized them as anything useful at all.

Larry
Top
Re: Hot Air and the Start of Flight.
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:05 am

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1960
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

Larry wrote:
fallsfromtrees wrote:
IC engines until after the CoGA is overthrown are a no-no. To much danger of convincing Joe Peasant that you really are worshiping Shan-Wei. You can't afford that at this time.


Well hopefully I edited the quote train properly!
In any case, the problem with an Internal Combustion Engine isn't the peasants. It will be the bloody great rock falling from the sky.
An internal combustion engine is a wonderful electromagnetic noise source. Couple an immensely detectable spark gap transmitter (which is what an ICE is) with a regular frequency beat (the RPM rate of the engine) in a localized location (And what satellite constellation can't do triangulation) and even the dumbest, most poorly programmed, NO Tech allowed, computer program is going to react. Nope, worries about peasant reactions are not the problem at that point. Precision guided kinetic kill strikes, however, are a cat of an entirely different color. This is why I argued for diesel engines in a previous post train here on the forum. Diesels are heat engines only. Simple compression. MUCH less detectable than an ICE, and for that matter far more compact, I would argue, than a steam engine of comparable output power. If I recall though, the general consensuses was that the machining capability was not yet up to producing the parts. Not sure I agreed, but that's what I recall. Also the need for precision types of alloys was the other argument against, again if my memory is correct. And again I'm not sure I agree.
ON the other hand I do recognize that Safehold's grasp of chemistry is still very weak, so the grasp on precision metallurgy may also be weak. Without demand (Which I doubt there's been till Charis started it's industrialization phase) metals such as chromium, manganese, boron, etc. simply may not have been in demand, mined, or produced in any quantity. Indeed it's possible no one even recognized them as anything useful at all.

Larry

Actually you do have to worry about Joe Peasant - because you could end up losing the support of your own population, and in that case, you are toast.
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top
Re: Hot Air and the Start of Flight.
Post by evilauthor   » Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:54 am

evilauthor
Captain of the List

Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 8:51 pm

fallsfromtrees wrote:Actually you do have to worry about Joe Peasant - because you could end up losing the support of your own population, and in that case, you are toast.


If you can get Joe Peasant to accept steam engines, diesels aren't that much of a leap. Going diesel would be cutting out the water/steam middleman and what goes on inside the cylinders isn't all that different from what goes on in every gun and cannon already in use by both sides (ie, explosions being used to push things).
Top
Re: Hot Air and the Start of Flight.
Post by Dilandu   » Tue Feb 03, 2015 2:42 am

Dilandu
Admiral

Posts: 2538
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Russia

If I recall though, the general consensuses was that the machining capability was not yet up to producing the parts. Not sure I agreed, but that's what I recall. Also the need for precision types of alloys was the other argument against, again if my memory is correct. And again I'm not sure I agree.


Please. The light and relatively powerfull steam engines were avaliable even in 1850th. And the Charisians currently at the 1890th at least technological level (...after all, they are able to just condense all the industry from the thin air... :D )
------------------------------

Oh well, if shortening the front is what the Germans crave,
Let's shorten it to very end - the length of Fuhrer's grave.

(Red Army lyrics from 1945)
Top

Return to Safehold