McGuiness wrote:We also have to take into account the fact that the map is left intentionally vague to allow RFC to have a better idea later if it occurs to him.n7axw wrote:Probably the best way to handle the maps is not to take them too seriously. I know that MWW fanatics like to micrometer stuff, but therein lies the path to insanity.
I personally just try to trace where things are relative to each other in the story line and then leave it at that.
Don
+1
As RFC says:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3080&p=66861&hilit=map+detail&sid=9afa92799323e74a85fd92902bfcf34e#p66861
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3361&p=77704&hilit=map+detail&sid=3032e1540147603a5daeb01c587889c9#p77704
Some of it is INTENTIONALLY vague as it is his and allows him to not be painted into a corner if the story develops a bit while writing.
I have appreciated having that much detail over the years to double check things (especially when reading snippets and I don't have a book handy to check the map).