cthia wrote:Detweiler and chainsaw. Funnnnnny.
Out of the 57 pages, I don't recall anyone shipping Hemphill and Oversteegen. And I gotta say, it is most interesting. It has potential, that ship. It could certainly make future war games interesting!
Scotty really needs to get married. His ace-boon-coon Harkness is. And I know how difficult it can be when one friend is a family man and the other isn't. It warms my heart thinking about beauty and the beast and their mates all laughing together playing bridge.
Er... "ace-boon-coon"?
As per Sonja and Shannon, I don't know if either of them are attracted to women, BUT, any male that paid attention in High School, then later college, knows that females have the distinct social advantage of being able to 'experiment' with the same sex and wake up the next morning as if nothing ever happened, as a given.
First comment - sheesh, "It was like nothing ever happened!" is NOT my idea of a positive review....
"Oh baby, that was totally forgettable!"
"After you - after what we shared - I feel totally and completely comfortable going on exactly as before...."
"Last night, it was like... it was like... it was like the night before last...."
Second - for kittens' sake, some 23 centuries in the future, I am darned well going to assume that most of civilization is going to rate that as "nobody else's danged business!" between two men, either. Or between a treecat and a Medusan, if it came to that. (Well - assuming sufficient communication for consent.) (Men may be clueless, but most of us do manage to communicate consent or lack thereof well enough when we realize the occasion demands....) I'm also going to assume that, oh, 70+% of long-term committed relationships involve exactly two people of opposite sexes.
She is tricky, yes. But then again, she's got health and prolong, she's got no critical dynastic need to produce heirs, I don't think she's lonely, and there aren't that kind of sparks going off with her and anyone. I'll reject the Henke/Oversteegen ship - I will in fact hiss at it and possibly yowl - but that's my only strong opinion in the area.And it's enough for me to just fantasize about the night of the great experiment. After all, even though the argument of the origins of the term bff rages on, no one disputes that it has its birth in the bosom of women. And I will always support any set of girls who are bed-friends-forever.
I notice, JeffEngel, that you didn't attempt to ship Michelle. She's just a tough nut to pop, err crack, err split eh? ... Doh!
I don't think she sells herself short. But I don't think she's got the ego to go around counting the heads of who may be ahead on the list, either. She just does her job as it comes up, large or small - and she does have the confidence not to blanch when the job is large.You know, Alice Truman has a lot to offer. Both militarily and intimately. I still maintain that she is in possession of one of the top most tactical minds in the 'verse. She just has to believe in it herself. It's certainly in her genes.
I peg it more as being simply self-possessed. Alison Harrington is also entirely comfortable among a lot of men and gets along with them swimmingly - and is precisely not one of the guys. It's not like that with Alice - that we know of - gracious but that would be unprofessional when she's usually surrounded by subordinates! - but I read it still as probably a matter of knowing who she is and what she's doing and being around being who are the same that way. If anything, that they are also handsome men may suggest that, even if she can't touch, she's happy to have the opportunity to look in addition to having competent professionals around.But she always seems to be a loner when it comes to affairs of the heart. Perhaps it's just a matter of her not consciously realizing that she's in the closet - that she's interested in women. Could be that she surrounds herself with a bevy of blonde males because she gets on so well with them. Gets on so nicely because she's, well, one of the boys?