Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests

Why no Crusher the first time?

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Why no Crusher the first time?
Post by Weird Harold   » Mon Dec 08, 2014 6:56 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

SWM wrote:I don't think you can get recommended for ATC until you are under consideration for command. In other words, you generally go straight from ATC to your new command.


I doubt that every ATC student has a specific command waiting their completion of the course. More likely, the majority of ATC students go on a list of "available for command appropriate to rank." Only exceptional officers, like Honor, get a command directly out of ATC; perhaps the top ten percent or so of each class in peacetime.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Why no Crusher the first time?
Post by Laz48   » Mon Dec 08, 2014 7:01 pm

Laz48
Lieutenant (Junior Grade)

Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 5:02 pm

One note: It is mentioned that only a few commanders get to command a destroyer, as Honor did. Back in her time, this was almost always an outdated destroyer.

HMS Tristam is a destroyer, albeit the most modern class. Perhaps due to the exponential growth of the navy, and the fact that Naomi earned her right by trial of fire, she was granted the Tristam, and will do the crusher before her next command.

Since RFC never explained, and the timelines between the crusher hnd her injuries don't reconcile, this could be one alternative.
Top
Re: Why no Crusher the first time?
Post by Dca   » Mon Dec 08, 2014 8:17 pm

Dca
Lieutenant Commander

Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 10:26 pm
Location: Boston, MA

So there seems to be a consensus that Honor's Crusher attendance timeline was the usual case, or at heart that it wasn't normally taught to senior-form middies. I'll retain my skepticism on this point, since I still don't see clear textev. However, by the time she taught, it clearly was taught to middies in a war-rushed and shortened undergraduate education. Abigail & peers under Oversteegen (or was it Helen Z and company?) were on their middie tour and talking about how many dinners they were invited to. Maybe the process changed, or maybe it was always that way and Honor's route to ATC was unusual? Or maybe the exigencies of service of the plot line demand it be this way?
Top
Re: Why no Crusher the first time?
Post by Weird Harold   » Mon Dec 08, 2014 8:25 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

Dca wrote:However, by the time she taught, it clearly was taught to middies in a war-rushed and shortened undergraduate education.


Just as both elementary students and college students study English or Math, so Middies and ATC students study tactics. The complexity and difficulty of the subject matter differs but the general subject heading is the same.

ATC stands for Advanced Tactical Course; it isn't suitable for introductory level students.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Why no Crusher the first time?
Post by kzt   » Mon Dec 08, 2014 9:05 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Dca wrote:So there seems to be a consensus that Honor's Crusher attendance timeline was the usual case, or at heart that it wasn't normally taught to senior-form middies. I'll retain my skepticism on this point, since I still don't see clear textev. However, by the time she taught, it clearly was taught to middies in a war-rushed and shortened undergraduate education. Abigail & peers under Oversteegen (or was it Helen Z and company?) were on their middie tour and talking about how many dinners they were invited to. Maybe the process changed, or maybe it was always that way and Honor's route to ATC was unusual? Or maybe the exigencies of service of the plot line demand it be this way?

No, she commanded the ATC. She ALSO taught tactics to midshipmen at the academy because she wanted to. A <> B
Top
Re: Why no Crusher the first time?
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Mon Dec 08, 2014 9:26 pm

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1960
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

kzt wrote:
Dca wrote:So there seems to be a consensus that Honor's Crusher attendance timeline was the usual case, or at heart that it wasn't normally taught to senior-form middies. I'll retain my skepticism on this point, since I still don't see clear textev. However, by the time she taught, it clearly was taught to middies in a war-rushed and shortened undergraduate education. Abigail & peers under Oversteegen (or was it Helen Z and company?) were on their middie tour and talking about how many dinners they were invited to. Maybe the process changed, or maybe it was always that way and Honor's route to ATC was unusual? Or maybe the exigencies of service of the plot line demand it be this way?

No, she commanded the ATC. She ALSO taught tactics to midshipmen at the academy because she wanted to. A <> B

She was asked to take two sections of Intro to Tactics at the academy, as well as asked to be Commandant of the ATC.
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top
Re: Why no Crusher the first time?
Post by Annachie   » Mon Dec 08, 2014 9:36 pm

Annachie
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3099
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:36 pm

Honor is the type who would consider watching het torturing her advanced students s good learning oppertunity and motivation for her basic students.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
still not dead. :)
Top
Re: Why no Crusher the first time?
Post by Dca   » Mon Dec 08, 2014 9:39 pm

Dca
Lieutenant Commander

Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 10:26 pm
Location: Boston, MA

kzt wrote:
Dca wrote:So there seems to be a consensus that Honor's Crusher attendance timeline was the usual case, or at heart that it wasn't normally taught to senior-form middies. I'll retain my skepticism on this point, since I still don't see clear textev. However, by the time she taught, it clearly was taught to middies in a war-rushed and shortened undergraduate education. Abigail & peers under Oversteegen (or was it Helen Z and company?) were on their middie tour and talking about how many dinners they were invited to. Maybe the process changed, or maybe it was always that way and Honor's route to ATC was unusual? Or maybe the exigencies of service of the plot line demand it be this way?

No, she commanded the ATC. She ALSO taught tactics to midshipmen at the academy because she wanted to. A <> B

Had to look up the textev, but you're right. It was Abigail in TSotS who had been in one of the other tactics courses and got invited ten times. I mis-remembered that they had taken the crusher, which was the basis of my confusion and question. So I guess ATC is something you're invited to take, if your field performance is good enough. That certainly explains why Honor didn't take it as an undergrad!
Top
Re: Why no Crusher the first time?
Post by roseandheather   » Tue Dec 09, 2014 7:29 am

roseandheather
Admiral

Posts: 2056
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 10:39 pm
Location: Republic of Haven

Laz48 wrote:One note: It is mentioned that only a few commanders get to command a destroyer, as Honor did. Back in her time, this was almost always an outdated destroyer.

HMS Tristam is a destroyer, albeit the most modern class. Perhaps due to the exponential growth of the navy, and the fact that Naomi earned her right by trial of fire, she was granted the Tristam, and will do the crusher before her next command.

Since RFC never explained, and the timelines between the crusher hnd her injuries don't reconcile, this could be one alternative.


I always assumed that Naomi did the Crusher during her recovery from her injuries at Monica - after all, it's a primarily cerebral exercise.

Of course, Tristram is a destroyer, so it's also possible that she's slated for the Crusher before her next command.
~*~


I serve at the pleasure of President Pritchart.

Javier & Eloise
"You'll remember me when the west wind moves upon the fields of barley..."
Top
Re: Why no Crusher the first time?
Post by Hutch   » Tue Dec 09, 2014 9:19 am

Hutch
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1831
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:40 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama y'all

roseandheather wrote:
Laz48 wrote:One note: It is mentioned that only a few commanders get to command a destroyer, as Honor did. Back in her time, this was almost always an outdated destroyer.

HMS Tristam is a destroyer, albeit the most modern class. Perhaps due to the exponential growth of the navy, and the fact that Naomi earned her right by trial of fire, she was granted the Tristam, and will do the crusher before her next command.

Since RFC never explained, and the timelines between the crusher hnd her injuries don't reconcile, this could be one alternative.


I always assumed that Naomi did the Crusher during her recovery from her injuries at Monica - after all, it's a primarily cerebral exercise.

Of course, Tristram is a destroyer, so it's also possible that she's slated for the Crusher before her next command.


RnH, you made me curious, so I did a little (as little as possible) research.

Naomi was severly injured at the Battle of Monica in February 1921 and evaucated to Manticore for treatment around March 1921 (upon arrival of Admiral O'Malley's forces). We next see her with Aivars offering Helen and Abagail their new jobs (TAC Officer and Flag LT.) upon Therekhov's very brief return to Manticore, just before Tourville and Chin showed up in July 1921.

So I don't see where there would have been the time for her to take the Crusher prior to assuming command of the Tristam.

I figure she'll get it in sometime...
***********************************************
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.

What? Look, somebody's got to have some damn perspective around here! Boom. Sooner or later. BOOM! -LT. Cmdr. Susan Ivanova, Babylon 5
Top

Return to Honorverse