The E wrote:Armed Neo-Bob wrote:Also, I was under the impression--maybe false--that just when you get to the Crusher is related to your career track, with tactical officers getting in a bit earlier. Is that wrong?
Rob
I don't think it's wrong per se, it's just a function of the tactical track being thought of as the direct route to command in the RMN. In other words, an officer from a different track would have to do a career switch (with all the remedial training that implies) before being selected for ATC, meaning they've had a longer career by the time they become eligible than their Tac counterparts.
Hello, The E. Um, what career switch?
Some examples: Samuel Webster was a communications officer before he had a tactical command (off-screen somewhere); then, and as CPT jg, he got one of the Trojans in Honor's Q-ship squadron. Now he is head of a department at BuWeaps, probably specializing in cybernetics and communication protocols. Where is the career shift?
Hemphill was rotated out to ship command in HoS, and sometime after the Fleet excersize in OBS, she was made CO out at Grendelsbane; "--no career change, just "seasoning".
Uncle Jim Webster was rotated from First Space Lord back to the Fleet in SVW, without regard to who would be best in his slot, because he was due (by tradition) to rotate, and because the shooting hadn't started yet. While the war interrupted that rotation for the senior Space Lords, there is no reason to believe they are going to insulate any of their other officers from gaining either command or administrative experiences.
I think FoD even mentioned that Sir Lucien Cortez had been CO of a battle squadron.
The RMN (so far) seems to expect _all_ of its officers to rotate through command slots (probably with tactically-challenged officers getting the support vessels instead of line vessels).
As I said in the first post, I thought when they actually got to the ATC related to their grade; Tactical Officers who don't get DD command, would go as senior Lt. Commanders as would other officers (before the war, those with influence). Most officers would go as Commanders, or even junior grade Captains. Those with bad officer evals (or, without political patrons) wouldn't go at all, and their careers would stall. Also, it was all-too-possible for someone's career to stall even if they were good people--Lt Cdr McKeon, Lt Brigham, or that sailing master from Hawkwing--all good people, but none of them selected for advancement before they served with Honor.
Pre-war RMN policy seems to be taken straight from the Napoleonic era Royal Navy, with 80 year old Lt Mercedes Brigham and the necessity of having someone else pushing your advancement. Which is how Styles got squadron or warship command; and Santino; and Pavel Young.
And it is possible to make Captain, jg without having a command at all, as both Jaruwalski and Ginger Lewis demonstrate. I just think that, like Hemphill herself, someone is going to decide they need a command experience to get "the shooter's perspective."
I don't think RFC is using our current military personnel practices for of his policies in the RMN; and it is fiction and he does need the friction to provide tension in the story.
Or, of course, I could be a horse's ass. this is way too damn long.
YMMV
Rob