ErikM wrote:I'll drop in my two bits and try to stick to the original posting. Feel free to comment or nuke it from orbit...
The top of the SLN seems to have realized that Battle Fleet's current ships, especially the reserves, are basically worthless as anything other than source of parts and materials. As of the end of ART they seem to be stumbling, 'aided' by the MA, towards more BC based strategies while R&D tries to play catchup with the SEM. Whether BC strategies, particularly against SEM-held or -allied systems, would work is IMO open to conjecture (LAC groups).
I've got some assumptions about what the SLN, and particularly BF really does know about SEM and havenite weaponry and ships as of the end of ART. In particular I'm thinking about generally accepted knowledge, not what 'crackpots' like al-Fanudahi might think.
- The SLN doesn't know about the Mk 16's full range and capabilites. At Zunker they were fired from 30M km. Monica and New Tuscany reports seem to be discounted or assume external pods were used.
- The SLN thinks dual drive missiles are large enough to require pods. IIRC Technodyne has only released the Trebuchet MDM to the SLN.
- The SLN has not thought about internal pod carriage. The time mantie pods were used against them, they were prelaid or externally carried. Their own pods are external-only.
- The SLN doesn't know about modern LAC offensive capabilities. They were shown to Filareta at second Manticore in the defense but not in the strike role. They should realize that CLACs exist though.
- The SLN knows the SEM has working FTL comm and has crunched it down to fit in recon platforms. See the Hermes bouys at second Manticore.
- The SLN hasn't a clue about SEM and havenite ship manning requirements.
- The SLN doesn't know about Keyhole, much less Apollo.
What I'm wondering is, if someone in the SLN does start thinking about whether pods can be carried inside warships, will they think that the Nikes are podlayers? After all, if podlayers exist then the manties would have had a reason to build BCs that big, beyond pride, intimidation factor or megalomania.
It might actually be an interesting story to see al-Fanudahi try to run a design study to try to draw up rough capability requirements or even plans for a 'next generation' BC or SD and assuming that al-Fanudahi has thought about internal pod carriage (maybe basing his thinking on fleet minelayers?). For the SD they might actually get something like an early Medusa (as of operation Buttercup) or maybe an early Sovereign of Space. Problems fitting enough SLN pods in a Nike-sized hull might lead al-Fanudahi to realize mantie missiles have to be quite a bit smaller than SLN ones (i.e. at the scarier end of his own 'radical' capability projections).
I'm not sure whether such a design study would be run as an 'against the fall of night' crash program or if it would be bureaucratic infighting as usual. There seem to be people at the top of the SLN who realise the former might (or should) be the case.
Comments?
It's not clear how much information from second Manticore actually made it back to the SLN. Since a state of war now exists between Manticore and the SL, any SLN survivors of second Manticore are now prisoners of war, and the SLN will not have been able to debrief them. The SLN does know about the FTL comms, as they have been used by Manticore on multiple occasions, and sometimes the SLN officer who saw it, actually survived to tell the tale. Not clear they have any knowledge of LACs, since so far, LACs were only used against them at second Manticore, so any information would have come from observers looking the ware between Haven and Manticore, and the SLN wasn't interested in a couple of neo-barb nations beating on each other. They probably regard any information about them as grossly exaggerated, and therefore not to be believed. Which means they are in for a very rude awakening the first time a BC gets ambushed by a squadron of LACs. It may actually take a number of times, before a BC survives long enough to get home to complain about the LAC of information about them.