Dilandu wrote:And something more about the idea of "civilized, humane" warfare. This idea could pretty easly led to another pretty ugly thing - the "civilized, humane" war would lost it's horrific image.
And this is REALLY bad, because the horrors of war is one of the most important deterrent. With the conceptions of some nice, restricted by rules, "civilized and humane" war, the nations and goverments would easily slip to the idea of military solutions to all problems. The war would be everlasting.
The full-scale, unconventional, total warfare have at least one good side: it's too horrific to start it easly. The horrors of war is a really powerfull voter for peace. If both sides knew, that the war between them would be horrific, destructive, and may easly led to the mutual destruction, they will be much more careful with their politic.
The assumption is that the people involved want to reduce the horrors of war. At least some Islamists are operating on the premise that in order to bring on the end times, they need to make things as horrible as possible. Primarily for their enemies, of course, but not only so.