Zakharra wrote:I think the RMN's smaller ships are going to be resembling electrons, trying to be in four places at once when the commerce raiding starts. As will the SLN. all sides are going to need more of the smaller vessels.
Where the GA ships are used depends on the feelings of the nations in it. Will the SEM public really be comfortable with RHN ships possibly patrolling, running escort duty in Silesia or Talbot? Would the RH public like the idea of RMN ships passing through their space to the NE part of SL space? Only time and RFC will tell.
Jonathan_S wrote:Exactly how many escort ships will you need in Silesia? Isn't it the better part of a year's cruise from the League? Plus unlike before Manticore and the Andies have real system defenses in place - heavy enough to trash any pirate and most commerce raiding squadrons. Most of the convoy work before was just to have ships to secure the bubble of n-space around the convoy on each end. Maybe you still need to convoy across the Rift, but otherwise ships should be quite safe to route freely between any Silesian systems knowing that the SLN is unlikely to be able to defeat the system defenses to lurk in wait.
Now resuming trading out into the Verge is a bit of a different story, but will probably be less volume than trading within the GA and to the Andies.
I agree both of you mostly. But in raiding the SKM/GA commerce, the SLN is actually going in to raid the people they identify as "partners" or "collaborators", not the very distant homeworlds of the GA. There is just too much distance involved for them to score any quick victory points, so I doubt the SLN will do that. (And they need some quick victory points, politically).
More likely, their intell will be looking for closer "neutrals" for ambushing trading vessesls. I expect them to find some success there, before the obvious "ambust."
As for commerce protection, we should be just a couple months from the resumption of missile production in Manticore/San Martin, and the initial construction of the replacement yards. I suspect more of the new construction for 1923 will be lighter vessels; SDs will be constructed more for GA allies, than for Manticore's expeditionary needs at the moment. If Haven builds the SD hulls, Manticore may decide to build the lighter ships for escort/commerce protection. Selling lighter "export" ships would also be a political and financial boost.
Silesia: there are 34 systems officially.
In War of Honor, excluding the forces Harrington brought with her, there was a DN squadron and screen for the system defense of their forward base; there were the various ships we saw involved in the different incidents with the Andies; and there was an off-hand vague reference to "scores" of light warships on various patrol/escort missions that we never saw.
Since annexation, Sarnow has deployed LACs, light warships and cruisers to systems under his command; the text in HOS suggests he got most of the Avalon and Kammerling cruisers, and the 80-odd Saganami-Bs have to be somewhere. Want to bet the Sag-B didn't get a massive fire control upgrade after Tiberian? If it can now fire the same double broadside of the Saganami-C, then it can match the 40 missile salvo density of the newer ship on bow and stern targets. Maybe it can't stack the salvos; in most circumstances, that shouldn't matter.
I'd take that against a pirate. Or a Sillie or Havenite rogue naval ship. Or a Sollie raider. Once the n-space regions of arrival and departure are secured, a system generally has NO pirate problem anymore. (Which is part of the reason for the LAC deployments to Talbott.)
Which may mean, the imperial revenue from Silesia may exceed expectations.
YMMV.
Rob