Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Jonathan_S and 65 guests

Lacöon I

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Lacöon I
Post by Brigade XO   » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:30 am

Brigade XO
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3192
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: KY

There is a problem with remaining neutral in a war. It usualy starts with one side or even both/all of the belligerents taking "neutral" shipping (sinking or as prizes) claming that it is actually carring war materials or otherwise breaking the various embargoes that have been anounced. Right about the same time, the belligerents start siezing or "nationalizing" assets of neutral nations as a nessisary part of the war effort. They also intern the nationals of non-allied nations.

Of couse, a Star Nation not in the actual war zone could direct it's commerce to trade with other non-combatant Nations and pointedly tell it's own citizens that it will NOT act to protect them if they insist on traveling into or trading with Systems that are "involved" with the war.
Top
Re: Lacöon I
Post by Zakharra   » Tue Nov 04, 2014 1:59 pm

Zakharra
Captain of the List

Posts: 619
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:50 pm

stewart wrote:
Zakharra wrote:

I think the banking sectors would write loans to the SL government, and many system governments will likely put some of their own money into the pot to develop their own systems industrial capacity: all funding isn't going to just come from the federal level, the systems themselves have a hell of a LOT of money floating around that could be utilized. When those systems find out the economic and military situation, if they haven't already, they are going to want their own defenses and those with shipyards will start building freighters that will be needed -now- if not last month.

------------------

Unless the Banking sectors have their figurative arms twisted up to their shoulder-blades, the SL bankers are likely to want to sit this one out, or transfer assets and resources to non-affected galactic sectors and respond that independent capital is "tight right now" and suggest that the SL Government self-finance.

Private sector shipping companies might encounter shipping premiums going into conflict zones.

New construction commercial / merchant shipping might find easier production/construction venues away from the core areas.

They're not "running scared" -- just being "prudent"

-- Stewart



What makes you think the bankers in the SL are going to have a choice? The banks and bankers in the US in WWII didn't have any choice if they wanted to support the US or not in the war effort. Other banks in other nations involved in the war didn't have any choice in the matter of getting involved or not. If any banks refuse, they can broken up and all assets seized (and this would be legal). The idea that a bank, large or small that operates in the SL could deny the government in a time of war is ludicrous. If the bank or banks want to keep operating in the SL, they have to help or they will likely lose their business license. I also believe that the SL controls the banks to a large degree so while they might protest, they will still have to help or else. Moving assets out of the SL could be seen as treason and a reason to nationalize said banking corp.

Part of the private sector shipping in the SL is likely to be confiscated for military use, but I don;t think the SLN is going to lean to heavily on doing that as they know that they need to build warships as well as rebuilding the economy and that means civilian shipping.

For the vast majority of the SL, the 2/3 with only LAC's is going to be very pleased not to have the BF club in their face, and may request a GA police force [a couple of SDP's etc] to protect them from the SLN, while others will worry more about their neighbors than the GA, and request a GA police force [a couple of SDP's etc], before getting into the better economic terms etc the GA is offering, so major parts of the SL will find the GA far more preferable than the SL fairly soon.


I agree with kzt. Those systems can request all they want, but the GA literally cannot afford to disperse their firepower that way. The saying of 'he who tries to protect everything, protects nothing' comes to mind. It would take the combined fleets of the SEM, RH and Grayson just to cover a fraction of the systems that would want/need protection. And at a time when those nations need their fleets to be fairly concentrated for defensive/offensive operations. To do what you suggest would be ceding the advantage to the SLN which could do significant damage (especially since there is no where -near- enough missile pods and missiles or Apollo equipped ships to be of any use. Those systems are going to be sol, especially when pirates start popping up.
Top
Re: Lacöon I
Post by stewart   » Fri Nov 07, 2014 7:59 pm

stewart
Captain of the List

Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 10:54 pm
Location: Southern California, USA

Zakharra wrote:[

I agree with kzt. Those systems can request all they want, but the GA literally cannot afford to disperse their firepower that way. The saying of 'he who tries to protect everything, protects nothing' comes to mind. It would take the combined fleets of the SEM, RH and Grayson just to cover a fraction of the systems that would want/need protection. And at a time when those nations need their fleets to be fairly concentrated for defensive/offensive operations. To do what you suggest would be ceding the advantage to the SLN which could do significant damage (especially since there is no where -near- enough missile pods and missiles or Apollo equipped ships to be of any use. Those systems are going to be sol, especially when pirates start popping up.


----------

As noted elsewhere, and in accordance with the "Harrington Doctrine" of liberating Sollie sectors into independent, GA-friendly star-nations, turning over captured Sollie ships to those new independent sectors would give them a credible anti-piracy / self-defense force.
Do not mis-understand me -- the Sollie Wallers and BC's are effective scrap metal or suitable ONLY as a temporary (small) space station.
The newer Sollie CA's -- specifically their Gladiator Class are about equivalent to RMN Starknights. They pose no threat to newer RMN / GNS / RN CA's (or even Roland DD's or Avalon CL's) but will be effective against pirates or most rogue privateers, likely even older x-State Sec MARS class.
We don't have enough info on capabilities of Sollie CL's and DD's, but I suspect they would be effective pirate-killers for system security.

And those Sollie Wallers and BC's? they could lead to a very good local industry of metal / scrap reclamation.

As the liberated sectors demonstrate their worth (Meyers System), if they have reasonably modern space facilities or shipyards, they "COULD" start making older Manty designs under license.
In our world, Italy and Netherlands were building F-104's long after Lockheed stopped producing them in the USA.

Just a few thoughts to stir the pot.

-- Stewart
Top
Re: Lacöon I
Post by stewart   » Fri Nov 07, 2014 8:16 pm

stewart
Captain of the List

Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 10:54 pm
Location: Southern California, USA

Brigade XO wrote:There is a problem with remaining neutral in a war. It usualy starts with one side or even both/all of the belligerents taking "neutral" shipping (sinking or as prizes) claming that it is actually carring war materials or otherwise breaking the various embargoes that have been anounced. Right about the same time, the belligerents start siezing or "nationalizing" assets of neutral nations as a nessisary part of the war effort. They also intern the nationals of non-allied nations.

Of couse, a Star Nation not in the actual war zone could direct it's commerce to trade with other non-combatant Nations and pointedly tell it's own citizens that it will NOT act to protect them if they insist on traveling into or trading with Systems that are "involved" with the war.


-------------

At the start of WWII, the USA was "neutral" in Britain's favor. Germany considered the US shipping of food and materiel as effectively allied and supporting Britain (which we were) and was conducting submarine warfare against US Merchant shipping from 1940 onward.
Spain was "neutral" in the Axis favor, Franco claiming he lacked the fuel to send his forces into the field, thus becoming the only AXIS head of state to survive WWII.
Portugal was initially Neutral in the Allies favor before joining the Allies later in the war.
Iran and Iraq, though officially neutral and partially occupied by Britain after WWI, supplied oil to the AXIS through most of WWII.

Neutrality is basically a function of what all warring parties are willing to tolerate combined with a perceived value of a neutral-zone / Switzerland-Sweden equivalent in a region.

-- Stewart
Top
Re: Lacöon I
Post by Brigade XO   » Fri Nov 07, 2014 10:43 pm

Brigade XO
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3192
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: KY

We have seen the Meyers system get it's independence back but so far they don't have any former SL warships. It is certainly possible that the GA may give them some but there are some reasons that Meyers is likely to be able to defend itself with one or more former SL ships under BC size---IF they are able to both crew and then effectivly operate them.

Mike made the start of using Meyers as a forward logistic base on a paying customer basis. The extraction operations mentioned in her conversation with the Prime Minister (I think that was the rank) would be a reaction mass source and RMN would be BUYING the materials at probably market rates. There will probably be RMN warships hanging around the system but NOT interfering with local government.

Assuming that Meyers could crew and work-up a couple of former SL DDs and a CL, they are still going to be in a hard place unless RMN ships are in-system if a couple of SLN CA's show up. Remember, the system not only has to have people who have a practical set of experience to run the ships, they have to bring them up to a level to handle combat and multi-ship operations within their own new SDF let alone working with anybody else against well practiced if not combat experienced FF forces.

The other systems that the GA helps would probably NOT be able to field a former SLN warship (of any size) to be effective against anything more than garden variety pirates. Sure, a FF DD would chew up- or just destroy which would be easier- any merchant converted to low-end pirate but not be able to stand up to any of the SLN units if they come to call. However, once a system gets free of the OFS or local dictator/Transtellar, they are PROBABLY going to have managed to kill off said former rulers in the process and dismantled (and also killed off) the military forces loyal to those former rulers so they will now be the ligitmate government.

What is a 5 warship task force from FF or BF going to do when it shows up in XYZZY system to find that there is NOBODY around of the former SL or SL friendly rulers and thier enforcers? Call for their surrender and or dop KEWs on the major cities to enforce compliance? Then they are faced with trying to hold the system with what and put what government in charge? If they leave ONE ship in the system to enforce the edicts or orders of whomever they leave as an OFS or military governor they cripple thier own mobile force and the SLN ship "protecting" the system is going to be debris as soon as anyone from the GA military comes calling for any reason.

None of this is going to end well for the SLN
Top
Re: Lacöon I
Post by Zakharra   » Fri Nov 07, 2014 11:52 pm

Zakharra
Captain of the List

Posts: 619
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:50 pm

stewart wrote:
Zakharra wrote:
I agree with kzt. Those systems can request all they want, but the GA literally cannot afford to disperse their firepower that way. The saying of 'he who tries to protect everything, protects nothing' comes to mind. It would take the combined fleets of the SEM, RH and Grayson just to cover a fraction of the systems that would want/need protection. And at a time when those nations need their fleets to be fairly concentrated for defensive/offensive operations. To do what you suggest would be ceding the advantage to the SLN which could do significant damage (especially since there is no where -near- enough missile pods and missiles or Apollo equipped ships to be of any use. Those systems are going to be sol, especially when pirates start popping up.


----------

As noted elsewhere, and in accordance with the "Harrington Doctrine" of liberating Sollie sectors into independent, GA-friendly star-nations, turning over captured Sollie ships to those new independent sectors would give them a credible anti-piracy / self-defense force.
Do not mis-understand me -- the Sollie Wallers and BC's are effective scrap metal or suitable ONLY as a temporary (small) space station.
The newer Sollie CA's -- specifically their Gladiator Class are about equivalent to RMN Starknights. They pose no threat to newer RMN / GNS / RN CA's (or even Roland DD's or Avalon CL's) but will be effective against pirates or most rogue privateers, likely even older x-State Sec MARS class.
We don't have enough info on capabilities of Sollie CL's and DD's, but I suspect they would be effective pirate-killers for system security.

And those Sollie Wallers and BC's? they could lead to a very good local industry of metal / scrap reclamation.

As the liberated sectors demonstrate their worth (Meyers System), if they have reasonably modern space facilities or shipyards, they "COULD" start making older Manty designs under license.
In our world, Italy and Netherlands were building F-104's long after Lockheed stopped producing them in the USA.

Just a few thoughts to stir the pot.

-- Stewart[/quote]



That's if the systems are willing to cooperate. I am sure that many on the Verge will be willing to do so. I count much of the Verge as being lost to the SL because of abusive and outright exploitative policies by OFS and the transstellars, but I remember in one of the books when the last wormhole was discovered that it was mentioned that even though the outer systems were exploited, after about a century, they became like much of the rest of the SL systems in relative wealth and power and influence as their tech levels improve and they become productive SL citizens and get representation. So the Core, Shell and Inner/outer Protectorate systems wouldn't necessarily be willing to work with the SEM/GA as people seem to think they are.

That aside, the systems the captured SLN ships are dropped off in have to have enough people with the right skills to man and use them effectively. Otherwise they would be able to be blown out of space by probably a FF destroyer that does have a skilled crew.

So far only the Talbott Quadrant will be close to building anything close to Manty warships (unless they ones from are before the miniaturization tech started taking off) because it requires technological abilities that most of human settled space isn't capable of reproducing yet. As far as I know, only the SEM, Grayson, Beowulf and the Andermani (and real soon the RH) have the miniaturization tech, let alone the micro fusion and fission power plants, the FTL and several other goodies that require an advanced industrial base and trained workforce to manufacture. For most of the Verge, even prewar Manty ships are likely too advanced for them to make.
Top

Return to Honorverse