Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 41 guests
Re: Thinking about defensive weapons systems | |
---|---|
by tonyz » Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:05 pm | |
tonyz
Posts: 144
|
One of the things to keep in mind about independent weapons platforms is the thing everyone except actual designers usually forgets about: sensors. Warships have MUCH better sensors (longer baseline, more size, vastly more computer power) than missiles or remote platforms are going to have. Even if you got a PDC cluster on a drone, how is the drone going to find and analyze its targets?
(Keyhole platforms operate in close conjunction with the warship so this doesn't really apply to them. Notice that they're VERY large and use beamed power from the warship as well, so they can have PD clusters on board.) |
Top |
Re: Thinking about defensive weapons systems | |
---|---|
by SWM » Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:07 pm | |
SWM
Posts: 5928
|
Ah, yes, I had forgotten that the Sharks carried Cataphract-B pods internally. Thanks. --------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine |
Top |
Re: Thinking about defensive weapons systems | |
---|---|
by n7axw » Fri Oct 31, 2014 8:24 pm | |
n7axw
Posts: 5997
|
Maybe you modify the idea used with Apollo and send out a control missile with a powerful AI with each missile pod. You wouldn't need FTL to dramatically improve the performance of your missiles at extreme range. Don When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
|
Top |
Re: Thinking about defensive weapons systems | |
---|---|
by stewart » Fri Oct 31, 2014 8:43 pm | |
stewart
Posts: 715
|
-------------- Don -- I like that idea -- or possibly using Apollo / Lorelei platforms with a packaged bank (or 10) of Viper / Mk31 Counter-missiles. -- Stewart |
Top |