Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests
Re: Honorverse series, the future..? | |
---|---|
by kzt » Tue Sep 30, 2014 2:55 am | |
kzt
Posts: 11360
|
No she made a lot of enemies. There are a lot of SL planets and I suspect she had 3 or 4 essentially perfect fake IDs, and she is living a very low profile life somewhere comfortable but off the beaten path.
|
Top |
Re: Information I'd love to know | |
---|---|
by dreamrider » Tue Sep 30, 2014 5:53 pm | |
dreamrider
Posts: 1108
|
My vision of this is that DIMITRI Young had done everything modern technology and great wealth would allow to make these records near-impossible to copy, other than maybe manually. dreamrider |
Top |
Re: Honorverse series, the future..? | |
---|---|
by kzt » Wed Oct 01, 2014 12:57 am | |
kzt
Posts: 11360
|
Ok, I'll bite. It's as secret room that only really trusted family members have access to, why would he do that? How much anti-photography gear are you going to put on your secret collection of stolen great master paintings you store in the hidden vault under your house, and why?
|
Top |
Re: Information I'd love to know | |
---|---|
by Lord Skimper » Thu Oct 02, 2014 7:54 am | |
Lord Skimper
Posts: 1736
|
If pods can launch fusion missiles why can't LAC?
________________________________________
Just don't ask what is in the protein bars. |
Top |
Re: Information I'd love to know | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:18 am | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8811
|
Because pods have (dangerous, poorly shielded, not to be used around humans) microfusion reactors to use to inject fusing plasma into the missiles to jump start their reactors. Modern LACs have fission plants, and can't inject the start-up plasma. (And for the aforementioned reasons you wouldn't put a pod-style microfusion reactor on board to supplement the fission plant) That said, you probably could build an old-style LAC with a fusion plant and have it fire fusion missiles. I'm just not sure why you'd bother, since it could carry less than a pods worth of missiles; and no reloads. But technically I suspect it could be done. (You'd also have to change it's fire control links to work effectively over DDM ranges, but again technically possible. Just not IMHO worth it) |
Top |
Re: Information I'd love to know | |
---|---|
by Duckk » Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:25 am | |
Duckk
Posts: 4200
|
Since a Shrike can fire a BC graser and run 3 sets of sidewalls, it wouldn't have any problems charging up microfusion plants.
The reason LACs don't carry MDMs is because it's an inefficient use of limited space. Just because you can mount a 5 inch deck gun on a torpedo boat doesn't make it a good idea. Likewise a LAC with all of, say, 8 missiles is a piddling amount. -------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope |
Top |
Re: Information I'd love to know | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:44 am | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8811
|
I thought RFC had mentioned at one point the microfusion plants needed a direct plasma injection to get started; not just a lot of amps of electricity. But in any case I completely agree that it's inefficient use of space. |
Top |
Re: Information I'd love to know | |
---|---|
by Duckk » Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:02 am | |
Duckk
Posts: 4200
|
LACs already generate plasma for their capacitor banks.
-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope |
Top |
Re: Information I'd love to know | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Thu Oct 02, 2014 9:00 pm | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8811
|
Oops. I forgot that RFC said all the Honorverse warship capacitors were plasma capacitors. I guess whatever plasma generator the LAC uses for that could probably jump start a microfusion reactor if it had to. |
Top |
Re: Honorverse series, the future..? | |
---|---|
by stewart » Fri Oct 03, 2014 1:03 am | |
stewart
Posts: 715
|
I would suspect that Georgia Young / Elaine Sakristos may have encountered one of the "wet-work" teams from Mesa, perhaps the same team that rendered Decroix as "no longer a problem". Georgia had many enemies, and even some of her "friends" may have seen her as more of a liability than an asset -- Stewart |
Top |