Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests
Bad Wormholes? | |
---|---|
by Zakharra » Mon Sep 22, 2014 10:02 pm | |
Zakharra
Posts: 619
|
I have no idea if this has been asked and answered, but I was reading FAQ on the Honorverse about the possibility of attacking through the Torch wormhole and wondered how many wormholes are there and how many lead to Bad Places like blackholes or things like that. I know it's really dangerous to transit an unexplored wormhole, but how common is it that wormholes are listed as too dangerous to use because something on the other side swallows the exploration ships that transit it?
|
Top |
Re: Bad Wormholes? | |
---|---|
by phillies » Mon Sep 22, 2014 10:10 pm | |
phillies
Posts: 2077
|
Someplace the textev says that there is only one wormhole of no return. |
Top |
Re: Honorverse series, the future..? | |
---|---|
by kzt » Mon Sep 22, 2014 10:35 pm | |
kzt
Posts: 11360
|
Iirc, there is at least one that nobody has ever returned from. But nobody knows why, as there isn't any method to determine where the wormhole goes before you pop out at the other end and look.
|
Top |
Re: Bad Wormholes? | |
---|---|
by Theemile » Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:23 pm | |
Theemile
Posts: 5243
|
It's mentioned in "Torch of Freedom" when they discuss sending in the Harvest Joy for the first ( and last) transit. ******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships." |
Top |
Re: Bad Wormholes? | |
---|---|
by dreamrider » Tue Sep 23, 2014 1:25 am | |
dreamrider
Posts: 1108
|
In regard to "How many wormholes", accepted implied canon, based primarily on other bits of the text surrounding the Shadow of Freedom/Harvest Joy drama, is that there are either ~100 or ~200 known hyperspace wormhole connections.
The uncertainty comes from the fact that it is unclear from the textev, a reflection by the Harvest Joy's captain on the history of wormhole exploration, whether he is thinking of the total number of first time exploratory one-way transits (recalling that mapping a hyper link takes TWO transits, one outbound and one return), OR thinking of the total number of hyper links ever explored completely, both ways. So, before the Torch terminus, one killer wormhole, or one-way wormhole, or wormhole into a star, or wormhole into a black hole, or wormhole into a dense debris field, or wormhole into an alien trap, etc, etc, etc. Out of 100 or 200 known termini. And that etc, etc, etc is very important to understanding story canon. It means that, until some other means is found to locate the far end of a wormhole that ships do not return from, that wormhole MUST be considered a killer anomaly, and NO OTHER SHIPS WILL EVER BE SENT THROUGH from the known end. It means that NOTHING is known about the far end of that hyper link EXCEPT THAT IT EATS SHIPS THAT TRANSIT. And modern hyper physics CANNOT map / understand conditions of the far end of new hyperlink WITHOUT a successful transit. People on this forum who don't think through the implications of the non-return of the Harvest Joy from the viewpoint of the researchers and authorities on the Torch end keep suggesting ways that the Torch wormhole can be exploited by the GA, or ways that the defenses of the far end can be survived. Those are totally insane propositions from the standpoint of an Honorverse astrogator. The authorities and astrogators of Torch and the GA DO NOT KNOW what happened to the Harvest Joy. They DO NOT KNOW anything about any defenses on the other side, nor have reason to even suspect enemy action in preference to any of a myriad of potential 'natural' disasters. They ONLY KNOW that the wormhole in Torch is one that ships DO NOT RETURN from. Nor do those ships manage to return through normal hyper in any reasonable time, nor do they manage to relay any form of communication through the human inhabited volume of the galaxy. It is an apparent killer wormhole. Given the information available at Torch, it makes no more sense to send/take any further ships, research OR military, through the Torch wormhole terminus than it does to have a ship try to synchronize her impeller wedge with a grav wave. Nor is there any drone or AI capability yet demonstrated in the Honorverse that would be capable of navigating a wormhole route, much less returning from an uncharted distant end terminus without human intervention or outside survey and calculation support. That is, in fact, the reason that the established method of mapping is to risk A survey vessel with a lot of specialized people and survey equipment aboard in the first place. (Sorry for the rant, but I just get tired of the people who just don't seem to get these pretty clear and logical constraints from the canon text. And, no, I don't mean you, OP; your question was well couched and reasonable. But the topic of the use of the Torch wormhole by the GA just seems to be one of those big misunderstandings that Will Not Die.) dreamrider |
Top |
Re: Bad Wormholes? | |
---|---|
by Hutch » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:10 am | |
Hutch
Posts: 1831
|
Well said, friend dreamrider. I concur completely.
Just to add the comments from Torch of Freedom to the thread (for future readers reference)
And from War of Honor:
***********************************************
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. What? Look, somebody's got to have some damn perspective around here! Boom. Sooner or later. BOOM! -LT. Cmdr. Susan Ivanova, Babylon 5 |
Top |
Re: Bad Wormholes? | |
---|---|
by SYED » Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:31 pm | |
SYED
Posts: 1345
|
Part o me thinks that the unsuccessfully transitioned wormhole, went to some where that had an armed force waiting for them. possibly a location that mesa wanted to be kept hushed.
|
Top |
Re: Bad Wormholes? | |
---|---|
by Amaroq » Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:34 pm | |
Amaroq
Posts: 523
|
That would be interesting. Especially because most people won't have remembered the throwaway line about a "killer" wormhole... *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
In War: Resolution. In Defeat: Defiance. In Victory: Magnanimity. In Peace: Goodwill. |
Top |
Re: Bad Wormholes? | |
---|---|
by JohnRoth » Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:55 pm | |
JohnRoth
Posts: 2438
|
You're talking about the original "killer" wormhole, not the Torch wormhole, right? We know the latter was defended by a task force from Mannerheim. I doubt it, or at least I doubt the MAlign's complicity. There are only two reasons why the MAlign would want a hyper bridge kept secret: they're using it to shorten their C&C loop, or it goes somewhere they don't want people looking at. In the first case, I have a hard time seeing why they'd care: sure, it would be nice to be able to keep using it, but losing exclusive use isn't a fatal attack on the Plan, and continuing to use it after one end has been discovered is risky. We know that the MAlign is against taking risks that can be avoided. The only way the second possibility makes sense is if it leads to a planet uncomfortably close to Darius, and that, in turn, suggests that they've scouted every system close to Darius looking for wormhole termini so they can put a permanent guard on them. Rather than that, I would expect that they'd have explored it themselves and done something to gain control of the system, like they did with the Twins to Torch link. I simply don't see it. |
Top |
Re: Bad Wormholes? | |
---|---|
by JohnRoth » Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:03 pm | |
JohnRoth
Posts: 2438
|
Not true. The idea that it's a killer wormhole is only one possibility. Enemy action is another. So are several others. The key point here is that they don't know which it is, and sending another ship through would undoubtedly be fatal in either case. Simply assuming that it's a "killer" wormhole is very poor intelligence work, and we're assured that the intelligence people on Torch are quite intelligent. The discussion about how to get a scouting force through in the face of an enemy task force sealing the other end is a separate issue from the analysis. |
Top |