BrightSoul wrote:Really? He can borrow mine... I have a couple.
Family's favorite gift for me to remind the classic procrastinator to stop procrastinating.DrakBibliophile wrote:David Weber will post snippets when he gets "a round tuit".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #1 | |
---|---|
by DrakBibliophile » Mon Aug 11, 2014 5:27 pm | |
DrakBibliophile
Posts: 2311
|
Like this:
*
Paul Howard (Alias Drak Bibliophile) * Sometimes The Dragon Wins! [Polite Dragon Smile] * |
Top |
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #1 | |
---|---|
by PeterZ » Mon Aug 11, 2014 5:32 pm | |
PeterZ
Posts: 6432
|
So, now you guys just need a "back tuit", huh?
|
Top |
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #1 | |
---|---|
by Joat42 » Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:23 pm | |
Joat42
Posts: 2162
|
Why o why do I have a mental image of RFC sitting in his chair reading this forum and chuckling heartily (and possible evilly) at our bumbling speculations....
--- Jack of all trades and destructive tinkerer. Anyone who have simple solutions for complex problems is a fool. |
Top |
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #1 | |
---|---|
by KNick » Mon Aug 11, 2014 8:20 pm | |
KNick
Posts: 2142
|
Because he probably is? _
Try to take a fisherman's fish and you will be tomorrows bait!!! |
Top |
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #1 | |
---|---|
by BrightSoul » Mon Aug 11, 2014 8:59 pm | |
BrightSoul
Posts: 1368
|
No probably about it, or did you miss his post a couple pages back? |
Top |
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #1 | |
---|---|
by runsforcelery » Mon Aug 11, 2014 10:39 pm | |
runsforcelery
Posts: 2425
|
*My bold. Who said they aren't leaving any clues? They aren't leaving clues leading to their identities or to their organization, but while I hate to disillusion you about real life, there are frequently intelligence agencies who don't have a clue (figuratively speaking, in this case) about the existence of a threat organization until it bites them on the butt. At that point they start looking for it, but without a loose end to pull on, it's very difficult to unravel a tight, cell-based organization, especially when you don't have the forensic tools present day investigators and intelligence agencies take for granted. Rayno's got lots of clues; he just don't have any that give him the information he needs . . . yet, at least. "Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as Piglet came back from the dead. |
Top |
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #1 | |
---|---|
by Weird Harold » Mon Aug 11, 2014 11:26 pm | |
Weird Harold
Posts: 4478
|
Like this one? .
. . Answers! I got lots of answers! (Now if I could just find the right questions.) |
Top |
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #1 | |
---|---|
by alj_sf » Tue Aug 12, 2014 6:24 am | |
alj_sf
Posts: 218
|
Sure, many agencies did that for years, the most flagrant example being probably KGB in UK, but wait 10, 20 years or more and things start to unravel at least to the point that people start to notice something is amiss. In a semi medevial society, without the modern technical means, I can accept easily the existence of secret societies hiding successfully for centuries but their mere existence will be known or at least suspected sooner or later if they do active operations and not simply collect open sources. St Zherneau is passive, operating in a place where the opponent is weak, so it is quite possible. A similar org in Zion is harder but still plausible. An active org, but fully unknown ? Here I have to raise a bit of ruckus. Now as you said, unravelling a tight cell based org is very hard, and the org can easily survive being partially discovered. An org hiding within the hierarchy of the inquisition is probably the simplest but here again, I dont think they can afford to be active. I cannot remember any historical example of secret society which was both operationally active and successfully hidden for more than a century. Even the Nizaris or the Sikh assassin sect I dont remember the name were known about quickly. this is not a big problem, there is a bit a break of suspension of disbelief but the story is still great. |
Top |
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #1 | |
---|---|
by FriarBob » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:59 am | |
FriarBob
Posts: 1061
|
Umm... they've been "operationally" active for less than THREE years... not a hundred... Before that, they were just in the buildup phase and/or the pure intelligence-gathering phase (and/or didn't exist at all). So they weren't "operationally" active yet. |
Top |
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #1 | |
---|---|
by alj_sf » Tue Aug 12, 2014 11:22 am | |
alj_sf
Posts: 218
|
Again, the operational skills shown are not compatible with newbies in command. The first operation they did we know of was the rescue of the wife of the ex-archbishop and they did that without any flaw while said wife was under inquisition surveillance. So the surveillance team (2 mens I think Rayno said) was either compromised or killed too. In the first case, they have seriously deep claws embeded in the inquisition, and that dont happen in little time. In the second they are very skilled, as even if the inquisitors were not expecting such attacks, they seem to be well trained from other textev. In both cases it suggest deep experience |
Top |