saber964 wrote:You guys are equating the value of Safeholdian gold to present times. I can remember a time when gold was not all that expensive relatively speaking in the early 1980's gold was trading for $200-250 an once to as high as $800.
This is the average price of gold per year over the last 160 years or so taken every 5 years.
1850 $18.93
1855 $18.93
1860 $18.93
1865 $18.93
1870 $18.93
1875 $18.94
1880 $18.94
1885 $18.94
1890 $18.94
1895 $18.93
1900 $18.96
1905 $18.92
1910 $18.92
1915 $18.99
1920 $20.68
1925 $20.64
1930 $20.65
1935 $34.84
1940 $33.85
1945 $34.71
1950 $34.72
1955 $35.03
1960 $35.27
1965 $35.12
1970 $36.02
1975 $160.86
1980 $615.00
1985 $317.00
1990 $383.51
1995 $383.79
2000 $279.11
2005 $444.74
2010 $1224.53
So until 1920 when you got a $20 gold piece you got roughly $20 worth of gold. It has only been since 1975 has gold been a roller coaster ride.
There is a really good reason for that - most developed nations were
explicitly valuing their currency based on gold, aka being on the Gold Standard. The only reason it isn't $20 cash for $20 gold is that for much of that time the Pound Sterling was the international medium of exchange.
Notice how there are basically two price levels pre- the breakdown of Bretton Woods in the '70s, of ~$20 an ounce, and then ~$35. This took active effort by governments and central banks to maintain, and was only abandoned relatively recently.
However, that's a result of a system with a lot of paper money (and much of the money supply was purely notional, on balance sheets and in accounts), but which is at least notionally convertible to gold.
In Safehold, while there is some banking, most money appears to be actual metal coins; there is convertibility between gold and money; and so mining substantial amounts of gold is effectively directly changing the money supply. If you increase the money supply, in an economy that isn't at the zero lower bound (which Charis in wartime certainly is not), you cause inflation. If you have too much inflation, you cause all kinds of ructions. As an example:
There will be contracts across Charis that specify fixed rents. If medieval/early modern England is anything to go by, most rents will be paid a few times a year, in customary amounts.
If inflation within a few years has caused a doubling of the money supply, a traditional rent of one mark a year will get you half of what it used to, and people depending on those rents will be in severe economic difficulty. Multiply those difficulties across Charisian society, and you have a whole lot of avoidable problems, in exchange for having a whole lot of shiny metal that can't do much.
In all seriousness, as long as the Crown can tax enough to pay its bills, and raise enough money through establishing a national debt to avoid an interest spiral and bankruptcy, the gold is better off in the ground, waiting for people to rediscover high-level electronics and need and excellent conductor. Silver likewise will have industrial uses in due course.
Now maybe, as Charis' economy expands, there will be a need for a greater supply of money to keep things moving. And maybe there'll be enough resistance to paper scrip that they need to mint more coin. But that should be all that is "found", and all that is mined, the rest just isn't worth the trouble.