Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

Gun evolution

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Gun evolution
Post by Captain Igloo   » Fri Aug 01, 2014 6:36 pm

Captain Igloo
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 269
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 4:02 pm

n7axw wrote:I remember how we used to sight in our rifles before hunting season to be sure that they were firing true. We had four power scopes and usually we'd set things at 250 yards.

Same thing for sighting in cannon in principle at least. Pick your range and go from there. Might even set up a scope/periscope arrangement for the guy aiming and pulling the trigger. I bet it would improve results. Right now what they are doing is just a bit better than throwing rocks.

Don


It's a little bit more complicated - look here
Top
Re: Gun evolution
Post by n7axw   » Fri Aug 01, 2014 8:30 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Captain Igloo wrote:
n7axw wrote:I remember how we used to sight in our rifles before hunting season to be sure that they were firing true. We had four power scopes and usually we'd set things at 250 yards.

Same thing for sighting in cannon in principle at least. Pick your range and go from there. Might even set up a scope/periscope arrangement for the guy aiming and pulling the trigger. I bet it would improve results. Right now what they are doing is just a bit better than throwing rocks.

Don


It's a little bit more complicated - look here


Thanks for the link. I would wager that this sort of stuff the Royal College and Baron Seamount could figure out eventually, especially with a little judicious help from Owl.

I have never made any pretense that my thought here would be an endall solution to all gunnery problems. I have merely offered a suggestion that I think would improve accuracy in tandem with the improvement of guns. Guns still have a long way to go as does the art of gunnery. But simply because Charis cannot achieve completely modern results immediately doesn't mean that nothing at all can be done.

My proposal is something that can be implemented on the basis of tech curently available to the EOC and I believe it would be an improvement on what they are currently doing. That is all I am claiming.

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Gun evolution
Post by Panzer   » Fri Aug 01, 2014 11:13 pm

Panzer
Lieutenant Commander

Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 10:10 am

What about a battle sight zero?
Top
Re: Gun evolution
Post by n7axw   » Sat Aug 02, 2014 8:42 am

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Panzer wrote:What about a battle sight zero?


This is the sort of thing I was thinking about in general terms. Whether or not it can be applied specificly, I don't know.

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Gun evolution
Post by Weird Harold   » Sat Aug 02, 2014 9:02 am

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

n7axw wrote:
Panzer wrote:What about a battle sight zero?


This is the sort of thing I was thinking about in general terms. Whether or not it can be applied specificly, I don't know.

Don


My ballistics program calls that "Point Blank Range" where the bullet will strike within the "margin of error" setting. For my .270 Winchester a point blank range for +/- one inch is 227 yards.

The problem with using that principle for Naval Guns is two-fold:

1: A BZO or Point Blank sighting doesn't account for moving targets or crosswinds.

2: Naval Guns fire far beyond even a very generous margin of error's point blank range. Even with a margin of error that will keep the shot on the hull of a ship -- say five meters -- the range is still going to be a fraction of the naval gun's range.

For example, the .270 Winchester round I hunted with has a lethal range of seven miles and an effective range of 700-800 yards. A modern Naval Rifle would consider that effective range close quarters.

What Charis needs first to improve accuracy and extend effective range is gyroscopic stabilization. That removes half of the relative motion by stabilizing the gun relative to the horizon.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Gun evolution
Post by n7axw   » Sun Aug 03, 2014 10:23 am

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Hi Harold,
I think your idea takes mine and develops it. Do you think that your suggestion is in the range of EOC tech?

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Gun evolution
Post by Weird Harold   » Sun Aug 03, 2014 11:29 am

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

n7axw wrote:Hi Harold,
I think your idea takes mine and develops it. Do you think that your suggestion is in the range of EOC tech?

Don


Point blank sighting or BZO works for any projectile weapon with a consistent projectile ballistics. It works as well for crossbows and black powder muskets as it does for the most modern hunting or naval rifles.

The only requirement is knowing how much the bullet drops and how much to aim above bore-line to get the maximum rise and drop for the chosen range. It isn't technology as it is mathematics or trial and error.

The problem in applying it to naval guns is that it is only useful at point blank ranges. You still have the problem of figuring out the proper elevation to get an impact at the range of the target.

Charis has all the necessary tech to get a relatively accurate range, set the gun elevation to a precise angle, stabilize the gun in relation to the horizon, and compute ballistics tables. They're using most of that for their howitzers (high-angle guns, or just angle guns) but Naval Gunnery changes conditions too fast for manual look-ups to be effective. They need computers (non-electric analog computers) to lay accurate fire at the ranges their naval rifles are capable of.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Gun evolution
Post by n7axw   » Sun Aug 03, 2014 8:17 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Weird Harold wrote:
n7axw wrote:Hi Harold,
I think your idea takes mine and develops it. Do you think that your suggestion is in the range of EOC tech?

Don


Point blank sighting or BZO works for any projectile weapon with a consistent projectile ballistics. It works as well for crossbows and black powder muskets as it does for the most modern hunting or naval rifles.

The only requirement is knowing how much the bullet drops and how much to aim above bore-line to get the maximum rise and drop for the chosen range. It isn't technology as it is mathematics or trial and error.

The problem in applying it to naval guns is that it is only useful at point blank ranges. You still have the problem of figuring out the proper elevation to get an impact at the range of the target.

Charis has all the necessary tech to get a relatively accurate range, set the gun elevation to a precise angle, stabilize the gun in relation to the horizon, and compute ballistics tables. They're using most of that for their howitzers (high-angle guns, or just angle guns) but Naval Gunnery changes conditions too fast for manual look-ups to be effective. They need computers (non-electric analog computers) to lay accurate fire at the ranges their naval rifles are capable of.


So my sighting in idea gets them about half way there. Oh well, my idea is still an improvement. Better than throwing rocks at the moon!! :lol:

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Gun evolution
Post by Weird Harold   » Sun Aug 03, 2014 8:25 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

n7axw wrote:So my sighting in idea gets them about half way there. Oh well, my idea is still an improvement. Better than throwing rocks at the moon!! :lol:

Don


I don't know about "improvement" -- the basic idea of BZO has probably been in use for as long as they've had cannon.

The biggest problem for naval gunnery is stabilization. Until Charis comes up with a stabilized gun mount, accuracy is going to remain an art instead of science.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top

Return to Safehold