namelessfly wrote:Weber has painted a rather optimistic scenario of the SEM's imperialism. Anyone reading Jerry Pournelle's fiction or his website are aware of the historical precedents of imperialism transforming a free republic into a totalitarian empire. Rome is the classic example but Athens followed the same path.
The ongoing experience of the US with imperialism is probably perceived by Manticore as another example of imperialism transforming a society from a democratic republic into an empire. By many objective measures, the US is far less free than before WW-2 and Roosevelt. The fact that a US President can routinely wage war without the consent much less a formal declaration of war from Congress would shock Roosevelt and all of his predecessors. The fact that the US usually refrains from exploiting it's conquests economically has mitigated the transformation somewhat.
Manticore is no doubt dissuaded from imperialism by observing how conquest has affected the RoH.
Namelessfly, first off, I really think we should avoid any temptation to contrast empires with democracies. The United States itself is for all intents and purposes an empire - I need remind no one that she grew from a miniscule part of the North American continent to hold sovereign jurisdiction over a major part of the continent, by way of several huge land purchases, wars of conquest against numerous indigenous nations as well as the Mexican war that gave her possession of all of the southwestern states between Texas and the Pacific.
Yet she still remains a democratic country, with a bone-deep commitment to those values that are fundamentally democratic in value - equal opportunity for all, equal treatment before the law, freedom of choice and the right to privacy and to worship as one wishes being just the most important.
While I deeply admire the United States, for many reasons, there are some aspects about her foreign policy that are sadly troubling, to say the least. You claimed that she doesn't exploit her conquests. I beg to differ.
I have no intention of starting a debate on the topic here, but I do think it is important to make it clear that no form of government is ever perfect, and that it is unhelpful to make sweeping statements that ignore that truth. States and governments are human constructs, and as such are as subject to both the weaknesses and strengths of human agency as any other institution or organisation.