Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jonathan_S, tlb and 21 guests

Manticoran calendar wrong?

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Manticoran calendar wrong?
Post by Cluttered Mind   » Sun Jul 13, 2014 5:56 pm

Cluttered Mind
Midshipman

Posts: 3
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 12:54 am

Let me preface this by saying that: 1) I've been trying to develop a comprehensive timeline for the Honorverse for a while now, and 2) I'm probably more anal about it than I should be :roll:

I recently obtained a copy of the RMN Jayne's Intelligence Review. Since it has Manticoran dates for Honor's pre-war service record, I thought: "Hey, I can convert these to Gregorian dates and add some new entries." Easy, right? After all, OBS says:

The official year of the Kingdom is 673 days long, with a leap year every third year. It is divided into 18 months, 11 of 37 days and 7 of 38, alternating for the first 6 and last 8 months, named (simply, if rather unimaginatively) First Month, Second Month, Third Month, etc.


Thus, Honor Harrington’s orders to Fearless, dated Fourth 25, 280 A.L. (using Official Manticoran Reckoning, or the Manticore planetary calendar), were also written on March 3, 1900 P.D. (Standard Reckoning)


So I decided to check on the date given for Honor's birthday, Ninth 22, 256 A.L. - which should correspond to October 1, 1859 P.D. - by calculating backward from her Fearless orders. Only it didn't - Ninth 22, 256 actually corresponds to May 7, 1856.

OK, I thought, so is the mistake in Jayne's dating or in the calendar design? To check, I decided to calculate forward from our other known date. First 1, 1 A.L. is stated to be March 21, 1416 P.D., so does adding 280 years of 673 days (plus almost four full M-months and 93 leap days) get you to March 3, 1900?

Nope. Instead you get December 2, 1930.

So it would seem that 673 days is a bit longer than a Manticoran year should be. Funnily enough, House of Steel lists Manticore's orbital period at 629.83 T-days instead of 673. I'm tempted to try this instead, but I'm stymied by the breakdown of the months and days per month, which equals 673.

Does anyone have any ideas to try to reconcile this? Thanks.
Top
Re: Manticoran calendar wrong?
Post by SWM   » Sun Jul 13, 2014 7:55 pm

SWM
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5928
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: U.S. east coast

Yes, I'm pretty sure the calendar as described in the early text was broken. I noticed this ten years ago when I tried to reconcile the calendar myself. There's a couple other discrepancies, if I recall correctly (it's been a long time). I think one was that calcuting backwards from some text, the Post Diaspora calendar appears to start in Year 0, not Year 1 as described in the text. But I haven't gone back to those calculations in a long time; I'd have to derive all the work again.
--------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine
Top
Re: Manticoran calendar wrong?
Post by Lord Skimper   » Sun Jul 13, 2014 8:45 pm

Lord Skimper
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1736
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:49 am
Location: Calgary, Nova, Gryphon.

Our current era calendar never had a year 0. Which is why the year 2000 was the last year of the twentieth century not the first of the twenty first. That was January 1 2001.
________________________________________
Just don't ask what is in the protein bars.
Top
Re: Manticoran calendar wrong?
Post by crewdude48   » Mon Jul 14, 2014 1:56 am

crewdude48
Commodore

Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:08 am

Cluttered Mind wrote:Let me preface this by saying that: 1) I've been trying to develop a comprehensive timeline for the Honorverse for a while now, and 2) I'm probably more anal about it than I should be :roll:

I recently obtained a copy of the RMN Jayne's Intelligence Review. Since it has Manticoran dates for Honor's pre-war service record, I thought: "Hey, I can convert these to Gregorian dates and add some new entries." Easy, right? After all, OBS says:

The official year of the Kingdom is 673 days long, with a leap year every third year. It is divided into 18 months, 11 of 37 days and 7 of 38, alternating for the first 6 and last 8 months, named (simply, if rather unimaginatively) First Month, Second Month, Third Month, etc.


Thus, Honor Harrington’s orders to Fearless, dated Fourth 25, 280 A.L. (using Official Manticoran Reckoning, or the Manticore planetary calendar), were also written on March 3, 1900 P.D. (Standard Reckoning)


So I decided to check on the date given for Honor's birthday, Ninth 22, 256 A.L. - which should correspond to October 1, 1859 P.D. - by calculating backward from her Fearless orders. Only it didn't - Ninth 22, 256 actually corresponds to May 7, 1856.

OK, I thought, so is the mistake in Jayne's dating or in the calendar design? To check, I decided to calculate forward from our other known date. First 1, 1 A.L. is stated to be March 21, 1416 P.D., so does adding 280 years of 673 days (plus almost four full M-months and 93 leap days) get you to March 3, 1900?

Nope. Instead you get December 2, 1930.

So it would seem that 673 days is a bit longer than a Manticoran year should be. Funnily enough, House of Steel lists Manticore's orbital period at 629.83 T-days instead of 673. I'm tempted to try this instead, but I'm stymied by the breakdown of the months and days per month, which equals 673.

Does anyone have any ideas to try to reconcile this? Thanks.


Did you take into account that a Manticoran day in only (I think something like) twenty two and some change hours?
________________
I'm the Dude...you know, that or His Dudeness, or Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing.
Top
Re: Manticoran calendar wrong?
Post by Weird Harold   » Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:46 am

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

crewdude48 wrote:Did you take into account that a Manticoran day in only (I think something like) twenty two and some change hours?


Twenty--two hours Twenty-seven minutes, IIRC.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Manticoran calendar wrong?
Post by Cluttered Mind   » Mon Jul 14, 2014 11:34 pm

Cluttered Mind
Midshipman

Posts: 3
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 12:54 am

crewdude48 wrote:Did you take into account that a Manticoran day in only (I think something like) twenty two and some change hours?


You know, at first read, I thought OBS had specified 673 T-days, but looking back through the Appendix I don't believe it actually says that at all. Using that figure, a year of 673 M-days equals 629.53 T-days, which is 0.3 days off the orbital period in House of Steel. Let me recalculate using that and see what happens. Thanks for pointing out what perhaps should have been obvious. :oops:
Top
Re: Manticoran calendar wrong?
Post by Cluttered Mind   » Tue Jul 15, 2014 1:12 am

Cluttered Mind
Midshipman

Posts: 3
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 12:54 am

Cluttered Mind wrote:
crewdude48 wrote:Did you take into account that a Manticoran day in only (I think something like) twenty two and some change hours?


You know, at first read, I thought OBS had specified 673 T-days, but looking back through the Appendix I don't believe it actually says that at all. Using that figure, a year of 673 M-days equals 629.53 T-days, which is 0.3 days off the orbital period in House of Steel. Let me recalculate using that and see what happens. Thanks for pointing out what perhaps should have been obvious. :oops:


OK, I've finished the first part of the check - going backward to Honor's birthday. Ninth 22, 256 A.L. is still wrong, but it's much closer now - April 8, 1859 P.D. That said, if you instead use Fourteenth 22, 256, that does (depending on where you count the fractional day) correspond to either September 30 or October 1, 1859.
Top

Return to Honorverse