hanuman wrote:In a sector right on the border of the Star Empire. However, would she have dispatched a task force to intervene somewhere located, oh, two or three hundred lightyears away from either the Star Empire's borders or a wormhole under the Star Empire's control?
The Harrington Doctrine has to start disassembling the Solarian League somewhere.
I wouldn't expect the Talbot Quadrant's assigned fleet to be wandering off to some random system two or three hundred light-years away in some other fleet's area of Operations.
hanuman wrote:Sure, I agree completely. On the other hand, we are looking at a rough globe that is, by now, way bigger than a thousand lightyears in diameter, with literally thousands upon thousands of inhabited star systems.
According to
the Universe of Honor Harrington:
Worlds of Honor
The Universe of Honor Harrington
The Solarian League
wrote:Composed of the oldest colony worlds, the Solarian League extends for roughly ninety-eight light-years from the Solar System. Old Earth is the League's capital but is only first among equals, as her daughter colonies had enjoyed centuries (in some cases over a millennium) of independence from the mother world and were unwilling to surrender their sovereignty when the new star nation emerged.
The Shell and OFS Protectorates probably double that radius, and that is the region of immediate concern to the GA. Human Occupied Space may well be "
way bigger than a thousand lightyears in diameter, with literally thousands upon thousands of inhabited star systems," But those inhabited star systems outside the space directly influenced by the Solarian League are of minimal importance.
hanuman wrote:Not even the Grand Alliance as a whole has enough warships, supply ships, repair ships and troop transports to cover all of human space, never mind Manticore alone. And without military muscle, diplomacy will always be nothing but an empty gesture.
IIRC, the Solarian League claims 1,800 or so systems, not including protectorates. The GA should be able to manage nodal fleet stations and random patrols over that many systems. Not that I believe complete Naval coverage will be either practical or desirable once Part One of the Harrington Doctrine is complete.
hanuman wrote:Yes, in SOME areas the GA-maintained 'safe zones' will eventually spread to star systems beyond those zones, but it will take time to do so, because the GA does not and cannot ever have enough military forces to speed the process up.
The GA will not be acting alone. They will be upgrading treaty partners in the same way they have upgraded Manticore Alliance partners and the Marsh system. Those treaty partners will be the primary spread of prosperity and safety to the remoter parts of the former SL.
hanuman wrote:However, in OTHER areas there will be too much chaos and turmoil to result in your '60s hippy' scenario. Think sub-Saharan Africa after neocolonisation. Or the Middle East, for that matter.
In the Short Term, you're probably correct. In those cases, the "Masadan Solution" might be applied -- with assistance from local treaty partners where feasible. In the long-term, recalcitrant systems can just be bypassed and ignored once any threat they pose to neighboring systems is dealt with.
hanuman wrote:Importantly, the GA members are not the only actors on the galactic stage. There are a LOT of independent actors, or there will be. Each and every star system will have its own motives, its own self-interest, its own ideological stance, its own perception of galactic affairs, its own insecurities and its own goals. Yes, many of them will align themselves with the GA, but many will refuse to do so for reasons of their own.
That is exactly why the Harrington Doctrine will work; despite differences in ideology and goals, self-interest will draw the majority into trade and foreign aid treaties, if not mutual defense treaties. It isn't necessary that those systems have treaties with GA Members, only that they work through diplomatic channels with someone and not through aggressive military channels.
The Andermani, Renaissance Factor, Erewhon, Pheonix Cluster, Beowulf, and new treaty organizations within the former SL, all provide varying degrees of the peace and stability necessary for Manticoran survival under the Harrington Doctrine. Manticore, and through it, the GA, can't physically occupy or even support every system that formerly made up the Solarian League. The best they can do is make strategic choices for direct association and encourage indirect associations through the strategic allies.
They still need enough friends in the former SL space to surround and encapsulate "unfriends" -- eg a majority of the 1,800 or so former SL systems to be friends with somebody in the GA.
Note that "somebody in the GA" and the list of alternative "peace-keepers;" It serves the same purpose for a confederacy to develop around Beowulf, or former SL members to join the Phoenix Cluster or ally with Maya or Erewhon as it does if the systems are direct treaty partners with Manticore.
hanuman wrote:And here is the truth, namely that the GA's common ethical and ideological orientation will preclude the use of military power to force other star nations to align themselves with itself. That would simply lead to the re-emergence of the kind of imperialism the GA is committed to eradicate, but this time with the GA itself as the driving force.
Moreover, the GA will be restrained in exactly how much diplomatic or economic pressure it can apply, because such pressure could very easily turn around and bite it in the backside - remember that self-interest I mentioned in the previous paragraph. NO world can reasonably be expected to sacrifice its own interests in favour of those of the GA, and I don't think the GA's leaders would do that except in extreme cases.
One of the points Honor makes in the Oft-quoted Paragraph is that Manticore -- and by extension the GA -- cannot be seen as expansionist. They cannot afford to absorb former SLN systems into the SEM and must rely on trade and mutual defense treaties and Foreign Aid. The only thing they have to insist on is real Neutrality.
In no case, is there any suggestion that a system should sacrifice its self interest and every implication that playing to a systems self-interests is the way to make them friends instead of enemies.
hanuman wrote:So the final point I wish to make, is that humans are collectively and individually too diverse, too self-aware and too self-driven to ever allow the kind of neat and stable environment you predict in the long run.
Yet the Solarian League and most of the rest of Human occupied space has had exactly that for over a millennium. The Harrington Doctrine aims at a return to the peace and prosperity the League knew before the Bureaucracy and SLN became so corrupt.
There have been wars on the fringes of the League, like the recent Manticore-Haven wars and there have been spates of Conquistador action from the Andermani and Legislaturalists, but in general and especially in those systems of most interest to the Harrington Doctrine Peace and Prosperity have been the rule rather than the exception.
The OFS Protectorates and Verge are probably the least peaceful regions, but even the Protectorates have been peaceful, if not prosperous, for the most part.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!
(Now if I could just find the right questions.)