Theemile wrote:So true, but without the BF to hammer any offenders, will it survive? It might as well be a rule from the Roman empire, it will have no teeth, and no consensus of others.
Will all the remaining powers sign an Eradaini Compact at some point in the future to return teeth to it? Because it is such an important principle, as you mention, will it even be needed because everybody sees this principle rationally and will abide by it's spirit inhierently without an agreement to do so?
I don't know if/when the GA will formally propose or adopt their version of the Edict, but it's in their clear self-interest to enforce something like it (whether they formally announce it ahead of the first atrocity they encounter or not)
And fortunately the forces you need for a single punitive mission are vastly fewer than you'd need to try to proactively police the galaxy. (But yes, there may still be the occasional minor violation that nobody with the power to retaliate hears about; but that happened under the Edict as well; for example Masada had effectively gotten away with using nukes against Grayson's surface during their last war)
For that matter you need to be kind of nuts to try it in the first place, because you're taking the risk that any remaining military forces of your victim might be able to pull off a revenge strike of their own. Even a single hijacked freighter that makes it into low orbit unsuspected is plenty to pull of megadeaths if the perpetrators are willing to die...
One of the purposes of the Edict is to ensure enough firepower is brought in response to a violation that the response
can be more measured to another atrocity in revenge.