Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests
Research behind splinters in ship battles? | |
---|---|
by Stormy » Fri Jul 04, 2014 1:44 am | |
Stormy
Posts: 54
|
I just got done watching an episode of Myth Busters that debunked splinters from cannon balls going through the wooden sides of ships being more lethal than the balls themselves. In fact, they did very little damage to the pig carcasses being used to test it.
Now, I'm pretty sure in the various books of the Safehold series, rather exhaustive attention was paid to the amount of splinters and how deadly they could be using various different forms of ammunition and lighter or thicker planking and what have you. Since I know DW puts quite a remarkable bit of research into his books, I was quite surprised that the results weren't a lot gorier for the pigs in this show! So how much research was put into this aspect of the stories? |
Top |
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles? | |
---|---|
by lyonheart » Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:24 am | |
lyonheart
Posts: 4853
|
Hi Stormy,
I haven't seen the particular Myth-busters segment, but there is a lot of witnesses as to splinters being a high casualty producer. If you're very lucky, RFC as a former game researcher may provide a precis of why and where to look to find such sources to make up your own mind. Keep in mind Myth-busters has often gotten things wrong and had to retract or try again to get rational results because their experiments were poorly thought out in the first place. L
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
|
Top |
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles? | |
---|---|
by Weird Harold » Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:43 am | |
Weird Harold
Posts: 4478
|
That episode of Mythbusters doesn't agree with centuries of historical evidence to the contrary. I'm not sure where they went wrong in testing the assertion, but there were a couple of substitutions for budgetary and availability issues. Specifically I think the ACW vintage field piece was considerable more powerful than the 18th century naval cannon most associated with "shivered timbers." .
. . Answers! I got lots of answers! (Now if I could just find the right questions.) |
Top |
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles? | |
---|---|
by Castenea » Fri Jul 04, 2014 7:42 am | |
Castenea
Posts: 671
|
I would also add that from seeing the size of splinters from lightning struck trees we are not always talking small slivers of wood here, the splinters could be the size of 2X4s. A secondary consideration is the standards of sanitation on ships of that era, and the likelihood for infection of any open wound. For many armies, WWI was the first war in which they lost more men to enemy action than to disease. |
Top |
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles? | |
---|---|
by Earldrygulch » Fri Jul 04, 2014 7:56 am | |
Earldrygulch
Posts: 79
|
They were using a 12 pound cannon, whis is not a 32 or 64 pounder. That episode was a "pirate episode" - they chose the size cannon that they felt was the typical caliber used by pirates. And, I am sure they could obtain. I question how many operable 64 lb muzzle- loadin cannon are around. My guess is that the majority in existance are monuments. |
Top |
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles? | |
---|---|
by AirTech » Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:02 am | |
AirTech
Posts: 476
|
The most telling is that they used a cannon with a much smaller caliber than the typical naval gun as it was a civil war horse artillery piece. The smaller hole punched (half the diameter of a typical naval gun) and the higher muzzle velocity (given the point blank range used) has a significant impact on the results. |
Top |
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles? | |
---|---|
by jgnfld » Fri Jul 04, 2014 9:41 am | |
jgnfld
Posts: 468
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9Grvye5SSA |
Top |
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles? | |
---|---|
by boballab » Fri Jul 04, 2014 12:10 pm | |
boballab
Posts: 402
|
The other main problem with the "test" was the actual "ship". They didn't use an actual ship they just built a wall made out of modern wood:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_(2007_season) ............................................................................
"I'd like to think that someone in the Navy somewhere has at least the IQ of a gerbil!" Rear Admiral Rozsak on the officers in the SLN |
Top |
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles? | |
---|---|
by saber964 » Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:09 pm | |
saber964
Posts: 2423
|
Your over looking that at various times over the age of sail the size of the guns changed upwards in weight. During the period of 1760-1790 18 pounders was about the largest in standard use. From 1800 to 1825 it was 24 pounds and IIRC 56 pound carronades, during the ACW era it shot up dramatically with some ships firing 100 pound shot or more.
|
Top |
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles? | |
---|---|
by Captain Igloo » Fri Jul 04, 2014 6:55 pm | |
Captain Igloo
Posts: 269
|
The standard Ship of the Line on the british side was the 168-feet (length of gundeck) 74-gun two-decker, which carried a mix of 32-pounder guns and carronades. The 32-pounder was found to be the most effective naval gun and the 74er was the smallest ship which could carry a full battery of them. A 32-pounder of this age had a muzzle velocity of 1600 feet per second, a maximum range of 2460 yards, with an optimum range of 400 yards, and could penetrate 2.5 feet of oak. |
Top |