Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests

Research behind splinters in ship battles?

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Research behind splinters in ship battles?
Post by Stormy   » Fri Jul 04, 2014 1:44 am

Stormy
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Idaho

I just got done watching an episode of Myth Busters that debunked splinters from cannon balls going through the wooden sides of ships being more lethal than the balls themselves. In fact, they did very little damage to the pig carcasses being used to test it.
Now, I'm pretty sure in the various books of the Safehold series, rather exhaustive attention was paid to the amount of splinters and how deadly they could be using various different forms of ammunition and lighter or thicker planking and what have you. Since I know DW puts quite a remarkable bit of research into his books, I was quite surprised that the results weren't a lot gorier for the pigs in this show! So how much research was put into this aspect of the stories?
Top
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles?
Post by lyonheart   » Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:24 am

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hi Stormy,

I haven't seen the particular Myth-busters segment, but there is a lot of witnesses as to splinters being a high casualty producer.

If you're very lucky, RFC as a former game researcher may provide a precis of why and where to look to find such sources to make up your own mind.

Keep in mind Myth-busters has often gotten things wrong and had to retract or try again to get rational results because their experiments were poorly thought out in the first place.

L


Stormy wrote:I just got done watching an episode of Myth Busters that debunked splinters from cannon balls going through the wooden sides of ships being more lethal than the balls themselves. In fact, they did very little damage to the pig carcasses being used to test it.
Now, I'm pretty sure in the various books of the Safehold series, rather exhaustive attention was paid to the amount of splinters and how deadly they could be using various different forms of ammunition and lighter or thicker planking and what have you. Since I know DW puts quite a remarkable bit of research into his books, I was quite surprised that the results weren't a lot gorier for the pigs in this show! So how much research was put into this aspect of the stories?
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles?
Post by Weird Harold   » Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:43 am

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

Stormy wrote:I just got done watching an episode of Myth Busters that debunked splinters from cannon balls going through the wooden sides of ships being more lethal than the balls themselves. In fact, they did very little damage to the pig carcasses being used to test it.


That episode of Mythbusters doesn't agree with centuries of historical evidence to the contrary. I'm not sure where they went wrong in testing the assertion, but there were a couple of substitutions for budgetary and availability issues. Specifically I think the ACW vintage field piece was considerable more powerful than the 18th century naval cannon most associated with "shivered timbers."
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles?
Post by Castenea   » Fri Jul 04, 2014 7:42 am

Castenea
Captain of the List

Posts: 671
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:21 pm
Location: MD

Weird Harold wrote:
Stormy wrote:I just got done watching an episode of Myth Busters that debunked splinters from cannon balls going through the wooden sides of ships being more lethal than the balls themselves. In fact, they did very little damage to the pig carcasses being used to test it.


That episode of Mythbusters doesn't agree with centuries of historical evidence to the contrary. I'm not sure where they went wrong in testing the assertion, but there were a couple of substitutions for budgetary and availability issues. Specifically I think the ACW vintage field piece was considerable more powerful than the 18th century naval cannon most associated with "shivered timbers."

I would also add that from seeing the size of splinters from lightning struck trees we are not always talking small slivers of wood here, the splinters could be the size of 2X4s. A secondary consideration is the standards of sanitation on ships of that era, and the likelihood for infection of any open wound. For many armies, WWI was the first war in which they lost more men to enemy action than to disease.
Top
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles?
Post by Earldrygulch   » Fri Jul 04, 2014 7:56 am

Earldrygulch
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 79
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:44 pm

Weird Harold wrote:
Stormy wrote:I just got done watching an episode of Myth Busters that debunked splinters from cannon balls going through the wooden sides of ships being more lethal than the balls themselves. In fact, they did very little damage to the pig carcasses being used to test it.


That episode of Mythbusters doesn't agree with centuries of historical evidence to the contrary. I'm not sure where they went wrong in testing the assertion, but there were a couple of substitutions for budgetary and availability issues. Specifically I think the ACW vintage field piece was considerable more powerful than the 18th century naval cannon most associated with "shivered timbers."


They were using a 12 pound cannon, whis is not a 32 or 64 pounder. That episode was a "pirate episode" - they chose the size cannon that they felt was the typical caliber used by pirates. And, I am sure they could obtain. I question how many operable 64 lb muzzle- loadin cannon are around. My guess is that the majority in existance are monuments.
Top
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles?
Post by AirTech   » Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:02 am

AirTech
Captain of the List

Posts: 476
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:37 am
Location: Deeeep South (Australia) (most of the time...)

Weird Harold wrote:
Stormy wrote:I just got done watching an episode of Myth Busters that debunked splinters from cannon balls going through the wooden sides of ships being more lethal than the balls themselves. In fact, they did very little damage to the pig carcasses being used to test it.


That episode of Mythbusters doesn't agree with centuries of historical evidence to the contrary. I'm not sure where they went wrong in testing the assertion, but there were a couple of substitutions for budgetary and availability issues. Specifically I think the ACW vintage field piece was considerable more powerful than the 18th century naval cannon most associated with "shivered timbers."


The most telling is that they used a cannon with a much smaller caliber than the typical naval gun as it was a civil war horse artillery piece. The smaller hole punched (half the diameter of a typical naval gun) and the higher muzzle velocity (given the point blank range used) has a significant impact on the results.
Top
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles?
Post by jgnfld   » Fri Jul 04, 2014 9:41 am

jgnfld
Captain of the List

Posts: 468
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 9:55 am

Earldrygulch wrote:... I question how many operable 64 lb muzzle- loadin cannon are around. My guess is that the majority in existance are monuments.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9Grvye5SSA
Top
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles?
Post by boballab   » Fri Jul 04, 2014 12:10 pm

boballab
Captain of the List

Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:00 am
Location: Ocean City MD

The other main problem with the "test" was the actual "ship". They didn't use an actual ship they just built a wall made out of modern wood:
Using a simple air cannon and four pig carcasses, the MythBusters proved that a cannonball could penetrate at least four pigs with a single shot. However, when fired at a wooden wall, the splinters did not have enough power to pierce any of the pigs. To fully confirm or bust the myth, the MythBusters used an authentic Civil War-era cannon. Through preliminary testing, they proved the Civil War cannon was significantly more powerful than the air cannon. However, when fired at the wooden wall, none of the splinters managed to penetrate the pigs with enough force to be lethal. Therefore, the MythBusters concluded getting hit with a cannonball was more deadly than the splinters it creates.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_(2007_season)
............................................................................

"I'd like to think that someone in the Navy somewhere has at least the IQ of a gerbil!" Rear Admiral Rozsak on the officers in the SLN
Top
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles?
Post by saber964   » Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:09 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

Your over looking that at various times over the age of sail the size of the guns changed upwards in weight. During the period of 1760-1790 18 pounders was about the largest in standard use. From 1800 to 1825 it was 24 pounds and IIRC 56 pound carronades, during the ACW era it shot up dramatically with some ships firing 100 pound shot or more.
Top
Re: Research behind splinters in ship battles?
Post by Captain Igloo   » Fri Jul 04, 2014 6:55 pm

Captain Igloo
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 269
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 4:02 pm

saber964 wrote:Your over looking that at various times over the age of sail the size of the guns changed upwards in weight. During the period of 1760-1790 18 pounders was about the largest in standard use. From 1800 to 1825 it was 24 pounds and IIRC 56 pound carronades, during the ACW era it shot up dramatically with some ships firing 100 pound shot or more.


The standard Ship of the Line on the british side was the 168-feet (length of gundeck) 74-gun two-decker, which carried a mix of 32-pounder guns and carronades. The 32-pounder was found to be the most effective naval gun and the 74er was the smallest ship which could carry a full battery of them. A 32-pounder of this age had a muzzle velocity of 1600 feet per second, a maximum range of 2460 yards, with an optimum range of 400 yards, and could penetrate 2.5 feet of oak.
Top

Return to Safehold