n7axw wrote:
Yep. Been a ham over 35 years now. I'll admit to being proud of it!
Don
KD70GB myself. I did let it expire though when I quit flying RC airplanes.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests
Re: Logic behind splitting Lacoon? | |
---|---|
by Relax » Sat Jun 21, 2014 2:49 am | |
Relax
Posts: 3214
|
KD70GB myself. I did let it expire though when I quit flying RC airplanes. _________
Tally Ho! Relax |
Top |
Re: Logic behind splitting Lacoon? | |
---|---|
by Roguevictory » Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:02 am | |
Roguevictory
Posts: 421
|
I'm strictly an amateur strategist so I'm probably mistaken but I thought Commerce Raiding campaigns usually have two objectives. 1: To disrupt the enemy economy and supply lines plus increase political pressure at home on the target power to end the conflict in the raider's favor. 2: To force the target power to divert warships to escort their merchant vessels and hunt down the raiders or both. If I'm right than wouldn't destroying the pursuing warships help objective 2 by decreasing the number of warships the League navy has available? Usually, based on my understanding, raider vessels are usually less armored or more lightly armed than warships, or out numbered badly enough that engaging warships is a serious risk but with the GA Tech edges it seems like the risk of a raider force being damaged or destroyed in an engagement with a SL pursuit force would be very low. I know in sheer numbers the ships the SL loses in such engagements probably wouldn't weaken it that badly but it seems like decreasing the number of hulls, and trained personal the League has available, even a little, would benefit the GA more than saving the missiles for GA Freighters would. |
Top |
Re: Logic behind splitting Lacoon? | |
---|---|
by Hutch » Sat Jun 21, 2014 9:40 am | |
Hutch
Posts: 1831
|
Roguevictory, no disputing your points on the purpose of Commerce Raiding, that's almost like quoting the manual. And if you noted from my hypothetical example, that's just what the GA unit was doing. I don't argue that the GA units can take out many times their tonnage with serious risk, but I'd be doubtful that their orders tell them to do this, except when they have no other options, for two reasons: (1). If these are light units, they have a limited supply of missiles, and once they are gone, they will need to either return home or to a central re-arming point. One engagement with, say, a division of SD's will probably end OK with my hypothetical group, but not leave them many missiles left. So to extend their primary mission, Commerce raiding, they will try to avoid combat. (2). Remember, the GA end goal is a fractured SL into smaller states, but to not give those states a reason to build fleets the size of the GA due to fear/revenge. Killing multiple SLN ships in multiple systems does not further that goal. IMHO as always. YMMV. ***********************************************
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. What? Look, somebody's got to have some damn perspective around here! Boom. Sooner or later. BOOM! -LT. Cmdr. Susan Ivanova, Babylon 5 |
Top |
Re: Logic behind splitting Lacoon? | |
---|---|
by jtg452 » Sat Jun 21, 2014 3:21 pm | |
jtg452
Posts: 471
|
Actually, I don't see how that's a the GA goal at all. The Mesan Alignment (which, we the reader know much more about than any of the characters outside of the Zilwikis and Cachats of the Honorverse) has that goal, but not the GA. The GA seems to want to eliminate the threat of the SL's meddling and attempts to subjugate independent star systems. All of the current mess started because of the Solly's picking a fight with Manticore (how the Solly's were manipulated into acting that way is beside the point). I do not argue that the fall of the SL isn't the most likely result of the war with the GA (just about inevitable, to be perfectly honest) but I don't see where they are intentionally setting out to topple it. |
Top |
Re: Logic behind splitting Lacoon? | |
---|---|
by drothgery » Sat Jun 21, 2014 3:30 pm | |
drothgery
Posts: 2025
|
Do you recall Honor's grand strategy exposition from a few books back? |
Top |
Re: Logic behind splitting Lacoon? | |
---|---|
by lyonheart » Sun Jun 29, 2014 2:28 am | |
lyonheart
Posts: 4853
|
Hi Hutch,
Excellent points as usual. I suspect that Case Lacoon was quietly researched over decades by visiting RMN ships during the 18th and 19th centuries, regarding the time for the RMN to reach their wormhole bridge stations, the nearest SLN bases and stations and their reaction times, as well as the communication lag between them and Terra. I find the fact that no RMN officer has ever doubted or at least suggested that Lacoon couldn't be done indicates all the reconnaissance indicated high confidence it would work, probably because the SL and SLN never considered anyone ever daring to do such a thing to the SL. So the RMN gets away with Lacoon 1 because of sheer surprise, and leaves before the SLN can react [6-8 weeks?], so the SLN then believes the threat is over, so no TG's need be sent upsetting all prior planning with not enough ships in the first place; so things are back to normal for the SLN, the watchdog in effect can go back to sleep. Then Lacoon 2 a month or 6-7 weeks latter almost totally surprises them again. "They're-r-ba-ack!" might sum up the situation. It's not quite a total surprise, but close to it since some in the SLN will think the RMN slunk away before the SLN caught them, so the first affront would never ever be repeated again in their mind, only the neo-barbs have shown up again, even bolder than before. There are going to be some more very surprised SLN CO's, if they haven't got word of Zunker or Saltash [26 days to Sol via Mesa-Visigoth], though the SKM's advance waring isn't all that great if Zavala with no db returned directly to Montana, even with the freed freighters going directly to Lynx, however if he detached a DD to Lynx with his report, Manticore could have gotten it ~15 days sooner. OTOH, once Manticore gets the news disseminating to the rest of the RMN is far faster thanks to the internal communications the wormhole bridges provide as you pointed out. We need a new wormhole bridge map, ART definitely should have had one, is there one in the works now? L
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
|
Top |
Re: Logic behind splitting Lacoon? | |
---|---|
by lyonheart » Sun Jun 29, 2014 2:51 am | |
lyonheart
Posts: 4853
|
Hi Don,
I don't think general commerce raiding most of the SL is that high a priority of the GA yet. They don't need to irritate anyone they can avoid, who might be rather friendly in the first place, when a quarter of the SL councilmen voted with Beowulf. Taking all those freighters that show up at the wormholes is a no brainer, but it will require a lot more manpower than Sag-C's etc have, so some sort of reinforcement bringing the crews needed will have been part of the updated planning for Lacoon 2. Aside: We have yet to see any CL's as big as the Roland, will we see some soon? The SLN CL's aren't much larger than their DD's, so whose CL's are that big? Eliminating the SLN bases, particularly the infrastructure will be the first priority of active operations, so the effective eradication of BF gets disseminated to the rest of the SL very quickly to promote all the fracturing HH talked about, while the GA destroys the FF's infrastructure, before going after the FF's remaining nodal points, like Meyers. We still don't know how many OFS sectors there are or some sense of their general size. Hopefully that will change in the next HH book, which is next year? L
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
|
Top |
Re: Logic behind splitting Lacoon? | |
---|---|
by lyonheart » Sun Jun 29, 2014 2:57 am | |
lyonheart
Posts: 4853
|
Hi KNick,
Well done. Thank you for making this very important point of how a powerful nominally informed Sollie citizen sees the explored galaxy. She doesn't consider herself a Solly, nor responsible for what the SL government does, which is what the bureaucrats have taken advantage of. Changing that mindset will be the real war the GA must win. L
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
|
Top |
Re: Logic behind splitting Lacoon? | |
---|---|
by lyonheart » Sun Jun 29, 2014 4:05 am | |
lyonheart
Posts: 4853
|
Hi Bert953,
Interesting points. Please feel free to post more here, we don't bite. Re-reading ART is always a pleasure. In response to your Lacoon 2 projections, I doubt the transtellars would attempt a coup at this point, they're far too independent, and the threat of one peaching would be too great. Regarding the rest of your Lacoon stages, I don't think the RMN is that rigid in its planning. The GA has already informed the SL it is at war with it, so no nonsense of presenting it in the Chamber of Stars is required, needed, or desired, NTM being too dangerous for whoever delivered it. Taking out the SLN infrastructure is a given, including all the reserves, which if Mistletoe's etc aren't to be used, LAC's will do fine. The SLN infrastructure and reserves are already well known and scouted, so little time needs to be wasted there. Given 6-7 'anchorages' averaging around 1200 old SD's, open to space with no power etc, roughly a cube 12 X 10 X 10 even if a couple thousand or ten thousand km apart, ought to be easy meat to Shrike-B's and Alpha's given their million km range. The effect of the loss of the reserves and infrastructure will have profound effects on the SL, NTM the effective elimination of BF; without them to threaten the rest of the SL and protectorates, the mandarins have essentially been castrated. That might generate some interesting personal experiences for them, that they may have thought would never come their way. Freeing all the protectorates isn't a critical priority at this moment. I almost feel the GA should send a couple hundred db's to visit the several hundred OFS victims, to broadcast on all channels what they know of 'Firebrand' and friends etc [a description would be nice], that Manticore has never encouraged such rebellions, while helping all they know of, but be patient because OFS will be gone shortly. Ninja's or commando's aren't really needed to free them, it will be quite easy when the local TG shows up, with enough boots to put on the ground. Between them the GA ought to be able to spare a couple DD's, a db or two for messenger duty plus several dozen LAC's to picket them according to the local threat and available allies. Since the mandarins have been using the 'big lie' for centuries, what do you think will be new? SLN commerce raiding will have many obstacles, like the odds the GA knows they're coming already, besides the results of Zunker and Saltash etc, which got to earth long before Kingsford came up with his brilliant idea. Just how brave will FF BC's be if they know GA DD's can kill them so easily? SLN R&D is still a joke, it's only been a few month's since they realized GA MDM's are really real when Filaretta got popped, though given how short the engagement range was, that's not a sure thing. RFC has stated it would take at least 5 years before the SLN could build an SDP, even if they knew what one was right now which they don't, and they don't have the five years in the first place. Regarding your Lacoon 4, the GA is already doing these things; spreading its message of truth around the SL, far beyond the mandarins' control, as HH suggested back in SFtS. I suspect between the GA and Beowulf [mainly GA db's with Beowulf diplomats], hundreds of db's are already being dispatched to sound out all those systems suspected of sympathizing with the GA, or are ready as soon as the SLN strike at Beowulf fails. Daud al-Fanudahi's group may survive to do that, assuming they realise how hopeless reforming the SL is, yet expecting them to turn their backs on their decades of service to the SL is quite another question; but I don't expect he thinks he will. If the mandarins were so stupid as to attempt military conscription [why?] it would only collapse their power sooner, nor is a 'reign of terror' against the OFS victims likely either, since they won't have any way to enforce it; given the two month's it'd take to get to them, the GA ought to be able to liberate them by then. Again, for your Lacoon 5 stage, why wait? I believe the GA will do almost all of these immediately because most don't involve the same assets. I believe there's supposed to be a hiatus of sorts in order for Raul etc to grow up, so we may wait a while before all the leads to the MAlign are tied up. L
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
|
Top |
Re: Logic behind splitting Lacoon? | |
---|---|
by SharkHunter » Sun Dec 07, 2014 4:19 am | |
SharkHunter
Posts: 1608
|
Seems to me (unless I missed something, it is 2am after all), that most of the posts assume that the major difference between L1 and L2 has emphasized was getting the Manticoran ships, and the timing set accordingly. Partially true, but strategically and tactically less so, and it's discussed several books before aRT.
In essence L-1 one is "stay the hell out of our playground", meaning that no SLN ship, warship or other can now see inside the GA based on access from the wormhole junctions. Information TO the League and therefore the SLN is thereby forced to a crawl, side benefit it gets the RMMC hulls back to safe space, meaning that Frontier Fleet will get notified about what is happening ONLY after it is too late to do anything about it. So it's a deep space communications blackout, of sorts. Then the L2 "pygmy" known as the RMN decides to step on ALL of the long distance commercial arteries using the Sag-C's, etc. effectively saying "oh, and by the way, we're taking over ALL of the playgrounds so that we can do whatever the hell we want where you can't see us. And we don't think you've got the ships or guts to stop what we just did." Which even the SLN leadership knows actually means "oh and by away behind the wall we're going to try and dismember your Verge and maybe some core system loyalties towards folks who like us better". ---------------------
All my posts are YMMV, IMHO, and welcoming polite discussion, extension, and rebuttal. This is the HonorVerse, after all |
Top |