Commodore Oakius wrote:This post has made me have a thought. I searched the forums using the search engine but didn't see anything discussed regarding this in the past:
What prevents a wedge being used in the defense role of a ground target?
You mean besides the highly concentrated gravity gradient that would suck in and destroy air molecules for kilometers around? And of course the shock waves coming off it as the molecules are accelerated beyond the speed of sound, by a couple of magnitudes.
Besides the fact that there's no textev anywhere of a wedge with only a single plane, which means you would have half above the target you want to protect, and half below, which, if you're protecting a ground target, might have implications for said ground?
Besides the fact that you need an impeller *ring* to generate a wedge - two if you wish to have the same kind of protection as a warship or freighter? The outer layer can be analysed and the frequencies can be compensated for to allow penaids to work, but you can't analyse the inner layer through the outer, thus preventing anything getting through (besides the grav gradient).
Commodore Oakius wrote:I thought I read somewhere that wedges don't work in atmo but that is disproved by the wedge powered SAM, so I may not have read that.
Oh, they work just fine in an atmosphere. There's just a *slight* environmental issue when you do that.[/sarcasm]
Commodore Oakius wrote:If this was adressed, either in pearls or info dumps or on the forums could you please point me to it?
As far as I know, it hasn't been, until now.
Commodore Oakius wrote:If not, except for destroying all things around it, this area defended by the wedge should be inpenetrable, as long as power exists.
Correct, although that "except for destroying all things around it" might cause someone somewhere to raise an objection.
Commodore Oakius wrote:Being the inteeligent people you all are, I am sure someone will come up with a way, besides destroying the planet around it (or the dreaded, dun dun dunnn, GRAVELANCE!
No such thing as a "gravelance", except inasmuch as the GRAVlance ought to be *in* a GRAVE.
Commodore Oakius wrote:Of cousre both the wedge and the [b]GRAVELANCE[/b would have to be modified, but I think it could be...
Or did I miss somthing somewhere?
Thank you
There is no textev that indicates anything like this is possible. Of course, David is always free to add previously unmentioned research into this sort of defensive emplacement, but I kinda doubt he will.