Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], penny and 26 guests

Issues due to the size of polities

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Issues due to the size of polities
Post by lyonheart   » Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:51 am

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hi Don,

Many have wondered here how long the SEM will last, and I could see the TQ once it's rich and successful begin to seek more a independent stance while others there seek a bigger share of WHJ revenue.

Whether its only seven hundred years or so for the Solarian League, versus a thousand for Rome, or two or three thousand for China, empires come and go.

Mike has made it very plain to Meyers that the last thing Manticore wants or needs is more basket cases to take care of, so I strongly doubt there will be any further encouragement of local efforts to join the SEM, however well intentioned. ;)

The SEM and GA expect to create polities their size or smaller that will find their new similar sized neighbors more competitors and potential threats than allies, thus preventing any efforts in re-establishing the SL.

Given the lack of identification with the SL at large by the respective system citizens, overwhelmingly preferring their own known and recognised leaders to anonymous bureaucrats doing things they don't approve of; its no wonder if not quite telling that Barregos and Rozsak are the most popular SL leaders recognised throughout the SL, in spite of their opposition to traditional SL policies.

Once the threat of of the BF is gone, many members will have many reasons to seek closer ties with the GA in preference to the SL, with far less to fear, and probably far more to gain, without the need for actual membership.

L


n7axw wrote:
Commodore Oakius wrote:I have been mulling this over the weekend.
Everything said is true, but I maintain that when you have an entity so bing that there is noticible comm lag you are going to foment dissallusion and rebellion, espcially if it is a corrupt centeral power. IE the Maya sector.
Even in history, the colonies from Britain, no real justification for the intial dicontentment, except lack of representation, because of the distances involved. The way Britain cracked down, loss of rights, lead to the further demonstrations that lead to the War.
Rome crumbled when it's government spread too far from central authority, of course there where many other reasons also, but it was a contributing factor.
Alexander the Great had to return from India because he was too far from the central power base, and his soldiers would go no futher.
It was mentioned that in any system you will find corruption, and that is true, but the further distant from the central power, of the head of power, in Alexander and Romes case, the more corrupt things become, and the greater the chance of corruption because someone feels they can get away with it.
With the SL, yes the type of government was a huge issue do to the bueractic tangels of law, but I feel the distance was an even bigger issue. Its how Roszak and Buragos could get so far in their plans to seperate. How Mesa, through Manpower, could manipulate Hung Bo, Crandal and Bing, because they were so far from central authority, they could be nudged (and their own arrogance of course).
I fear for the SEM for just that reason. When it was just the Manticore system everthing is pretty tight. Even with Bassalic and San Martin, they are only a wormhole away. Now with the Talbet Quadrent added, it is sof far off into the distance, yes I know they have a Commonwealth system there, but really, aside from the excesses of OFS, and looking at what OFS was truly meant to do, how different is expansion into the TQ then OFS helping systems genuinly in need, before it became totally corrupt. "The road to hell is paved with good intentions."
I know RFC can make it all work as he writes it but I fear that it could lead to bigger issues.

**quote="Duckk"**
What really matters is if there is a system in place to enforce the social contract the government has made with the governed. That is what ailed the Solarian League, not necessarily the sheer physical distance involved. The Sollies intentionally gave their government weak powers (in most areas, at any rate). While a great idea for protecting the founding systems' independence, it also made holding them accountable nigh impossible. The SEM, on the other hand, has clear lines of power and mechanisms with which offenders can be caught and punished.**quote**

And when the League was smaller I bet it had clear lines as well, until they were blurred and mangled by legislation and buracracy.

EDIT: Submitted to early :oops: :lol:
I fear that as time goes on, the governing of a large and growing polity will create these blurred lines. Law upon law, upon precedent, upon cultural quirk, will eventually lead to inablitiy to do anything concrete for fear of offending someone else.


There is somethimg to your point, here. But remember that Rome lasted a thousand years. The SL is what, maybe 700 years old give or take. Large or small, all things change, either by renewal or decay. Nothing is permanet.

Don
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: Issues due to the size of polities
Post by hanuman   » Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:37 am

hanuman
Captain of the List

Posts: 643
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 3:47 pm

Commodore Oakius wrote:I have been mulling this over the weekend.
Everything said is true, but I maintain that when you have an entity so bing that there is noticible comm lag you are going to foment dissallusion and rebellion, espcially if it is a corrupt centeral power. IE the Maya sector.
Even in history, the colonies from Britain, no real justification for the intial dicontentment, except lack of representation, because of the distances involved. The way Britain cracked down, loss of rights, lead to the further demonstrations that lead to the War.
Rome crumbled when it's government spread too far from central authority, of course there where many other reasons also, but it was a contributing factor.
Alexander the Great had to return from India because he was too far from the central power base, and his soldiers would go no futher.
It was mentioned that in any system you will find corruption, and that is true, but the further distant from the central power, of the head of power, in Alexander and Romes case, the more corrupt things become, and the greater the chance of corruption because someone feels they can get away with it.
With the SL, yes the type of government was a huge issue do to the bueractic tangels of law, but I feel the distance was an even bigger issue. Its how Roszak and Buragos could get so far in their plans to seperate. How Mesa, through Manpower, could manipulate Hung Bo, Crandal and Bing, because they were so far from central authority, they could be nudged (and their own arrogance of course).
I fear for the SEM for just that reason. When it was just the Manticore system everthing is pretty tight. Even with Bassalic and San Martin, they are only a wormhole away. Now with the Talbet Quadrent added, it is sof far off into the distance, yes I know they have a Commonwealth system there, but really, aside from the excesses of OFS, and looking at what OFS was truly meant to do, how different is expansion into the TQ then OFS helping systems genuinly in need, before it became totally corrupt. "The road to hell is paved with good intentions."
I know RFC can make it all work as he writes it but I fear that it could lead to bigger issues.

Duckk wrote:What really matters is if there is a system in place to enforce the social contract the government has made with the governed. That is what ailed the Solarian League, not necessarily the sheer physical distance involved. The Sollies intentionally gave their government weak powers (in most areas, at any rate). While a great idea for protecting the founding systems' independence, it also made holding them accountable nigh impossible. The SEM, on the other hand, has clear lines of power and mechanisms with which offenders can be caught and punished.


And when the League was smaller I bet it had clear lines as well, until they were blurred and mangled by legislation and buracracy.

EDIT: Submitted to early :oops: :lol:
I fear that as time goes on, the governing of a large and growing polity will create these blurred lines. Law upon law, upon precedent, upon cultural quirk, will eventually lead to inablitiy to do anything concrete for fear of offending someone else.


Oakius, the Maya Sector's leaders managed to avoid detection due to their distance from the centre, yes, but the reasons why they started their separatist conspiracy in the first place had absolutely NOTHING to do with Maya's distance from Sol. Those reasons were rather more complicated than that - firstly, because OFS refused to give up its dominion over Maya, so that the Sector could enter the League as a full member with all the rights, freedoms and privileges attached to full membership; and secondly, because both Barregos and Rozsak were determined to protect Maya from the worst violence that would inevitably follow the expected breakup of the League.

Had the Solarian Bureaucracy, OFS and great corporations not oppressed and exploited the Protectorates so ruthlessly, that coming breakup would not have happened (at least, not quite so 'soon' and possibly not quite as violently as Barregos and Roszak expect it to be).

But all of that abuse by the bureaucrats, corporations and OFS were symptomatic of the weaknesses and limitations of the League's constitutional system, and NOT of the distance between Sol and the Protectorates.

Remember that the formal breakup of the Solarian League actually started not in the Protectorates, after all, but with Beowulf's decision to hold a referendum on secession from the League - and Beowulf is not only the oldest of humanity's extrasolar colony worlds, but one of the closest to the Sol starsystem.
Top
Re: Issues due to the size of polities
Post by hanuman   » Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:52 am

hanuman
Captain of the List

Posts: 643
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 3:47 pm

lyonheart wrote:Hi Don,

Mike has made it very plain to Meyers that the last thing Manticore wants or needs is more basket cases to take care of, so I strongly doubt there will be any further encouragement of local efforts to join the SEM, however well intentioned. ;)

The SEM and GA expect to create polities their size or smaller that will find their new similar sized neighbors more competitors and potential threats than allies, thus preventing any efforts in re-establishing the SL.

[/quote]

Hey Lyonheart, that's not quite correct. Mike told the Prime Minister of Meyers that the Star Empire had no intention of establishing Solarian-style 'protectorates' over the systems it freed from OFS rule.

Ever since Queen Elizabeth and her government first received San Martin's petition for annexation to the old Star Kingdom, Manticore has been willing to consider expansion on the same basis, namely VOLUNTARY petitions for annexation that originated with the applicant system's government and ratified by popular referendum.

That's been repeated several times throughout the series, and that's how the Talbott Quadrant's annexation and the founding of the Star Empire came about, after all.

So Manticore isn't against further expansion, just against expansion by conquest.
Top
Re: Issues due to the size of polities
Post by Hutch   » Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:20 am

Hutch
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1831
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:40 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama y'all

hanuman wrote:
lyonheart wrote:Hi Don,

Mike has made it very plain to Meyers that the last thing Manticore wants or needs is more basket cases to take care of, so I strongly doubt there will be any further encouragement of local efforts to join the SEM, however well intentioned. ;)

The SEM and GA expect to create polities their size or smaller that will find their new similar sized neighbors more competitors and potential threats than allies, thus preventing any efforts in re-establishing the SL.


Hey Lyonheart, that's not quite correct. Mike told the Prime Minister of Meyers that the Star Empire had no intention of establishing Solarian-style 'protectorates' over the systems it freed from OFS rule.

Ever since Queen Elizabeth and her government first received San Martin's petition for annexation to the old Star Kingdom, Manticore has been willing to consider expansion on the same basis, namely VOLUNTARY petitions for annexation that originated with the applicant system's government and ratified by popular referendum.

That's been repeated several times throughout the series, and that's how the Talbott Quadrant's annexation and the founding of the Star Empire came about, after all.

So Manticore isn't against further expansion, just against expansion by conquest.


Hanuman, first welcome to the Forum if you haven't previously been greeted.

And I agree with you, while the name is the Star EMPIRE, it has been (with the exception of Basalisk) a completely voluntary Empire, with people asking (and indeed, voting overwhelmingly in the case of Talbott Sector) to join it.

Contrast this to other Empires in history, who imposed their rule on others, who tended to resent it and could (and did) rebel if they thought they had a chance to pull it off.

Can the SEM last? I think so, as long as it continues to grant a certain level of autonomy (see Talbott) while still insisting that the basic freedoms and protections under the law for all people on the planet is mandatory.

And if the Wintons stay smart (and nothing indicates that they won't in the next few centuries), it will also have ways for polities to leave peacefully and without warfare unlike most other Empires.

We shall see...well, probably not as we're speculating hundreds of years into the future, but the basic fact is while it is called the Star Empire, it is much more like a (dare I say it) Federation of Planets.

IMHO as always. YMMV.
***********************************************
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.

What? Look, somebody's got to have some damn perspective around here! Boom. Sooner or later. BOOM! -LT. Cmdr. Susan Ivanova, Babylon 5
Top
Re: Issues due to the size of polities
Post by Commodore Oakius   » Tue Jun 17, 2014 8:34 am

Commodore Oakius
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 257
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 10:11 am

n7axw wrote:There is somethimg to your point, here. But remember that Rome lasted a thousand years. The SL is what, maybe 700 years old give or take. Large or small, all things change, either by renewal or decay. Nothing is permanet.

Don

Right, and by extension so will the SEM. My point is the size of the government system will contribute to the length of the effective continueation of the nation.

hanuman wrote:
Oakius, the Maya Sector's leaders managed to avoid detection due to their distance from the centre, yes, but the reasons why they started their separatist conspiracy in the first place had absolutely NOTHING to do with Maya's distance from Sol. Those reasons were rather more complicated than that - firstly, because OFS refused to give up its dominion over Maya, so that the Sector could enter the League as a full member with all the rights, freedoms and privileges attached to full membership; and secondly, because both Barregos and Rozsak were determined to protect Maya from the worst violence that would inevitably follow the expected breakup of the League.

Had the Solarian Bureaucracy, OFS and great corporations not oppressed and exploited the Protectorates so ruthlessly, that coming breakup would not have happened (at least, not quite so 'soon' and possibly not quite as violently as Barregos and Roszak expect it to be).

But all of that abuse by the bureaucrats, corporations and OFS were symptomatic of the weaknesses and limitations of the League's constitutional system, and NOT of the distance between Sol and the Protectorates.

Remember that the formal breakup of the Solarian League actually started not in the Protectorates, after all, but with Beowulf's decision to hold a referendum on secession from the League - and Beowulf is not only the oldest of humanity's extrasolar colony worlds, but one of the closest to the Sol starsystem.

First, warm welcome. Relitive newbie myself. Love to discuss, if you can believe it :lol: :roll:

Because the of the distance from th ecenter of the SL the OFS is able to create their own fiefdoms and run them as they like. Its the very fact that the SL is so large that those issues are allowed and take place. If it were smaller, the ability for corruption would be less, as would the desire, I believe, but the further you get away from the central power the less loyalty you have.
As to you second point, I could be wrong, and if so please correct me, but I don't think they saw a break up of the SL when they started the whole idea of the independant Maya sector. I think they just wanted to protect it, and a certain amount of personal ambition, but mostly to protect it from the excesses of OFS. The potential break up of the SL comes just after we learn of their plans, I believe.
The Solarian Bureaucracy, OFS and great corporations caused the problems we see rife in the SL, but my argument is with a smaller polity, something where the size of the star nation is not so large to allow these people and legislatures to have so much power to commit graft, fraud, larceny, murder, nepitism, cronism ect.
would limit the excesses of the same. The smaller the nation the easier it is to control such abuses. Also, with the larger SL the Assembly, is that the legislative body?, has so many view points being represented that there is little, if any, progress on any issue, theoretically.
I fear a similer problem for the SEM via the TQ. There are just too many different nations there, and so far from Manticore itself, even from Spindle, I feel it is a matter of time before similer issues begin to crop up, and it will tarnish the SEM and the GA.
I may not be articulateing my argument correctly, and I may be way off base, and I am sure RFC has and idea if this is going to impact the overall story, but I find it a great thought to banter and a concern for the SEM.
Top
Re: Issues due to the size of polities
Post by crewdude48   » Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:43 am

crewdude48
Commodore

Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:08 am

Every one joined the SEM voluntarily, just like Masada and Selisia. I am not saying that those worlds are not better off, I'm just saying that there is a precedent for taking systems against their will.

Hutch wrote:
hanuman wrote:Hey Lyonheart, that's not quite correct. Mike told the Prime Minister of Meyers that the Star Empire had no intention of establishing Solarian-style 'protectorates' over the systems it freed from OFS rule.

Ever since Queen Elizabeth and her government first received San Martin's petition for annexation to the old Star Kingdom, Manticore has been willing to consider expansion on the same basis, namely VOLUNTARY petitions for annexation that originated with the applicant system's government and ratified by popular referendum.

That's been repeated several times throughout the series, and that's how the Talbott Quadrant's annexation and the founding of the Star Empire came about, after all.

So Manticore isn't against further expansion, just against expansion by conquest.


Hanuman, first welcome to the Forum if you haven't previously been greeted.

And I agree with you, while the name is the Star EMPIRE, it has been (with the exception of Basalisk) a completely voluntary Empire, with people asking (and indeed, voting overwhelmingly in the case of Talbott Sector) to join it.

Contrast this to other Empires in history, who imposed their rule on others, who tended to resent it and could (and did) rebel if they thought they had a chance to pull it off.

Can the SEM last? I think so, as long as it continues to grant a certain level of autonomy (see Talbott) while still insisting that the basic freedoms and protections under the law for all people on the planet is mandatory.

And if the Wintons stay smart (and nothing indicates that they won't in the next few centuries), it will also have ways for polities to leave peacefully and without warfare unlike most other Empires.

We shall see...well, probably not as we're speculating hundreds of years into the future, but the basic fact is while it is called the Star Empire, it is much more like a (dare I say it) Federation of Planets.

IMHO as always. YMMV.
________________
I'm the Dude...you know, that or His Dudeness, or Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing.
Top
Re: Issues due to the size of polities
Post by Commodore Oakius   » Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:55 am

Commodore Oakius
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 257
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 10:11 am

crewdude48 wrote:NotEvery one joined the SEM voluntarily, just like Masada and Selisia. I am not saying that those worlds are not better off, I'm just saying that there is a precedent for taking systems against their will.

I know you meant to say "not", see bold above. :D

And this is my fear. Precedent can lead to dangerous futures. They can be slippery slopes which, once you tumble down, you can't stop.

Elizabeth wouldn't continue conquest, of course not, but a weaker king or queen may, if the government at the time found the need to do it and was able to control the monarch, see Grayson.

OFS took systems against their will "for their own good."
I said in a previous post, "the road to hell is paved with good intentions"
Top
Re: Issues due to the size of polities
Post by crewdude48   » Tue Jun 17, 2014 12:26 pm

crewdude48
Commodore

Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:08 am

Commodore Oakius wrote:
crewdude48 wrote:NotEvery one joined the SEM voluntarily, just like Masada and Selisia. I am not saying that those worlds are not better off, I'm just saying that there is a precedent for taking systems against their will.

I know you meant to say "not", see bold above. :D


Actually, I meant to be a sarcastic a-hole.
________________
I'm the Dude...you know, that or His Dudeness, or Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing.
Top
Re: Issues due to the size of polities
Post by Hutch   » Tue Jun 17, 2014 12:42 pm

Hutch
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1831
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:40 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama y'all

Commodore Oakius wrote:
crewdude48 wrote:NotEvery one joined the SEM voluntarily, just like Masada and Selisia. I am not saying that those worlds are not better off, I'm just saying that there is a precedent for taking systems against their will.

I know you meant to say "not", see bold above. :D

And this is my fear. Precedent can lead to dangerous futures. They can be slippery slopes which, once you tumble down, you can't stop.

Elizabeth wouldn't continue conquest, of course not, but a weaker king or queen may, if the government at the time found the need to do it and was able to control the monarch, see Grayson.

OFS took systems against their will "for their own good."
I said in a previous post, "the road to hell is paved with good intentions"



Point taken gentlemen, albeit I would remind you that the Sileslian planets are more in a 'protectorate' status and not full members of the SEM. Presumably, once local governments in Silesia that respect their citizens rights are established, they will have the right to dissolve any ties with the SEM. And Masada certainly isn't part of the Star Empire--they were a festering sore that had to be lanced and still requires treatment but certainly not part of the SEM.

I can't see that slipperly slope in Elizabeth or Roger, but I guess it is possible for the future....but that may be centuries hence, as I noted before.

Still, some very interesting discussions.
***********************************************
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.

What? Look, somebody's got to have some damn perspective around here! Boom. Sooner or later. BOOM! -LT. Cmdr. Susan Ivanova, Babylon 5
Top
Re: Issues due to the size of polities
Post by Commodore Oakius   » Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:29 pm

Commodore Oakius
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 257
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 10:11 am

Hutch wrote:
Point taken gentlemen, albeit I would remind you that the Sileslian planets are more in a 'protectorate' status and not full members of the SEM. Presumably, once local governments in Silesia that respect their citizens rights are established, they will have the right to dissolve any ties with the SEM. And Masada certainly isn't part of the Star Empire--they were a festering sore that had to be lanced and still requires treatment but certainly not part of the SEM.


Still, some very interesting discussions.


And OFS had a lot of protectorates too. The idea was for them to stand on their own as well, or at least that is my extrapolation of what it was menat to be. I don't doubt the Silesia may very well do so, but, and again I am harping on the work, it sets a precedent.
And yeah, Masada was out right conquored.

crewdude48 wrote:Actually, I meant to be a sarcastic a-hole.


I'm sorry, I was just making a joke. I didn't mean for it to be offensive. I apologize if it was too flippant.
Top

Return to Honorverse