n7axw wrote:Hi Commodore Oakius,
I see you are relatively new, so welcome to the forums. Thank you for your nice post. I will try to respond here as best I can.
Don
So this post isn't ridculously long I only left your openning in. (EDIT: Can you imagine if I left it in?! )
Thank you for your welcome. I love good coversations like these I tend to get opinionated and go off half-cocked, so if I cross any lines tell me.
Maticore will definately have the power to project but my argument is that it should not. Once it starts projecting it wil slip and fall into the shoes of the SLN and, in the way of all humans, all the problems that plague BF and FF will crop up in the Macticoran Navy. The issue comes down to distance. The further away from you central power of orders the more lax things become, and the more likly it is to have corruption leak in. OFS is an example in the extreme. Should the GA protect their shipping? Yes. Should the GA beout and about solving wars and keeping peace? Maybe. (it is similer to the U.S. Should we go around putting down evil dictators in other countries?)I am just about a third through Shadow of Freedom. All these little systems are going to be looking for help from the Manties to fight off OFS. They cant have the manpower to be all these places, and I wonder if they should. Once they remove OFS they are going to have to militarily support the system, at the very least in space, until things get under control, or they will be completely vunrable to outsiders. Take that commitment and multiply that by a few hundred and it is just too much. They are having trouble secureing Talbot as it is.
I think OFS and Trans-steller satraps will end up fighting eachother to exhaustion, leaving everything more vunrable then before and the systems they control more destitute then ever. That, however, is just my opinion. I also think BF commanders will set up their own satraps as well. It will be a septic pool of vipers and piranhas.
The leauge was definately far from perfect, but... With the Manties in Talbot, they would be in better position to help trim the excess of the SL. The SL would become nervous over the size of the SEM and the GA and focus more internally to get themselves prepared for a potential conflict. Granted the MA is pushing the confrontation, but I still feel the league is better then the anarchy that will ensure when it collapses.
As for the Highridge expasion. I see what you mean. Just remember the Talboters requested to be annexed, the Highridge government just wanted more trade to "build the peace" lol.
Weird Harold wrote:The Swiss have never needed to project power, but they have historically provided some of the best and most reliable mercenaries, like the Papal Guards.
Based on that statement I would compare the Swiss a bit more on the Andermani. The Swiss did have some of the finest military commaders of the age though. They took the new tech (ha, muskets as new tech) of their age in the 16th and 17th century and delevoped a balanced force mix that was immesly succesful. It was adopted by the German states and then the British modified it to the well known and, at the time, effective standards well all know and love.
Alizon wrote:What you get in essence is a Huge Silesia with islands of some stability but with a large area of general chaos. Of course it's likely to be MUCH worse that Silesia because these won't be small frontier worlds with limited resources, these are going to be shell and core worlds with much larger needs and resources to fill them some with SDFs and the remnants of the SLN floating around.
All of this is going to create lots of instability which trade and commerce wither and die in and so do the economies of all concerned. What you're going to get is a economic and social upheaval which, if left unchecked, could make the Dark Ages seem like and era of enlightenment.
I think I said this or somthing similer earlier, and if not I was thinking it and I whole heartly endorse this idea. It will become a new Silesia, with less government, so worse off.
Trade is the key. With distances so far for communitcation tade will be the only thing keeping civilization alive. Granted, trade bring pirates, but that is inevitable. I think it is possible, maybe even likely for many of the systems to attempt to band together, they should anyways, but they wouldnt be able to stand against the OFS and trans-steller satraps. Trade brings military protection and money. Protection buys time and money buys your own defenses.
DarkEnigma wrote:I've read many a post of people talking about the Eridani Edict as if it still matters. I would think that one of the biggest consequences of the League's imminent collapse has already happened.
The only thing that gave the Eridani Edict any teeth was the fear of the SLN. Well the GA is well on its way to proving the SLN is a paper tiger so in effect the Eridani Edict is null and void. Sure, the GA will still abide by it but they aren't nearly large enough to police the galaxy (or scare it into submission like the SLN did) which means that as the League unravels we could see a lot more orbital strikes as warlords and tyrants stake out their claims in the ensuing chaos.
The edict will never die, in name, and perhps even in fact, but the truth be told, it is like cold war threats of nuclear devestation. Go ahead and nuke us, before we die will nuke you back. Go ahead and bomb the planet indiscrimanatly, we'll wipe you out.
The very fact of its existance is the best deterrant. No nation strong enough to resist the galaxy wide outrage of violateing the Edict will do so because of the loss of trade, ships and lives to their own nation as a consequence.