Hi Alizon,
I'm sorry, I thought I posted this last night and discovered it wasn't 'up' just now, again my apologies.
My 'childish' remarks were indeed intemperate.
I can honestly plead a lack of sleep was involved in my 'pathetic' temper tantrum, which you can check by my posts via their time hacks.
Wondering about the 'what-ifs' is part of involving yourself in any story and often any tiny aspect of that story, and so I should have been more understanding of what you were attempting to do; as we can all be quite moved by a single simple phrase or clause, such as RAH's "finished the salad and handed it to the refrigerator" in SiaSL has stayed with me since I read it 45+ years ago.
Regarding the SL's survival, I don't think it deserves to survive, nor I see a sign its really begun to make the required decisions to do so; the leaders such as they are remain grossly ignorant of the danger they're in nor all the potential ramifications of their short sighted decisions, too many just hoping they can scrape by the current mess and return to their previous routine of ripping everyone off beyond the old league core rather than truly reforming what they know needs to be fixed.
We have only the thoughts of Kolokoltsov regarding his regard for the prospect of reform and survival NTM to judge the rest of the Mandarins, obviously we haven't read their thoughts for some very good RFC type reasons, so their ulterior motives are quite suspect; from her various comments Omosupe Quartermain is an obvious Mesa shill, Nathan MacArtney is not that bright to start with and certainly not willing to reform the OFS etc, though we have no textev he's as influenced by Mesa as Quartermain he doesn't need to be; Malachai Abruzzi is too cynical and too selfish, too predatory and too quickly oriented towards expediency to seriously consider let alone support the required reforms; while Agata Wodoslawski might be cautiously receptive to some of Kolokoltzov's possible reforms, we have no textev she's not as venal as the rest of them.
Given how the MAlign likes to manipulate from the shadows, and Captain soon-to-be Admiral Gweon's comments, he may be the nearest MAlg agent to Kolokoltsov, the other mandarins may have their CoS's or chief secretary as the MAlign influence, but who doubts its there?
Kingsford is hardly a fresh broom, so who do you see fixing things and leading the way for the SL's survival?
Regarding your hyper defense, when I first read MoH where HH took 8th Fleet into Haven, but left it ten LM's from the hyper limit I was concerned because it seemed so obvious the RHN could drop right on top of it well within energy range etc, unless there a lot more lesser ships [destroyers to cruisers] still up in hyper, guarding the back door, through all the pertinent hyper bands, probably in pairs to provide adequate warning [30 min-1 hour?].
Because 8th Fleet couldn't sustain that tempo for the weeks and month's of the negotiations, I considered it had probably moved into the RZ of one of the gas giants like Yeltsin's Uriel that had an RZ of almost 5 LM, far away from the commercial operations, of which RD's vetted every cargo barge etc though deep enough to avoid a surprise attack yet well within range of anyone trying to reset their hyper generators after launching any missile salvo's [ie 4-8 minutes] of at least 2 LM, though 2.5 would put it beyond the primary effective extreme range of the RHN's MDM's, were the RHN to pop out and launch away at them.
That never happened, ie there's no textev for it because such a hyper attack is evidently precluded when proper precautions are taken.
Given how important hyper scouts and relays have been demonstrated since HH did it so many years ago in FIE, contacting the BC's simulating being an SD screen IIRC, I suspect the GA as a whole is quite experienced and adept at ensuring such precautions against being surprised are SOP for all fleet maneuvers and movements, so neither can surprise the other, while Kingsford also seems to be of the same mind.
L
Alizon wrote:lyonheart wrote:Hi Alizon,
My apologies.
I didn't realise what a sensitive woman you were, I'm sorry to hurt your feelings that way.
As a matter of fact, your gender wasn't important to me, the value and accuracy of your ideas were; I thought that was how things were supposed to work.
But I'm glad we've finally gotten to the core truth here, that you really weren't that serious about this concept.
Making that clear would have helped the discussion.
But congratulations on being so convincing, because I really thought you were being really really invested in defending the SL's survival despite all the obvious evidence, so I was almost beginning to worry about your mental thinking, it was so repetitive.
Imagination is obviously very important, but why revealing your gender is important or justification for flaming is something else again.
I am glad you're another lady fan of RFC, I'm friends with several BTW, and I'll give you full credit for imagining the hyper defense concept; but after 8 years of posting at the bar and the forums, seeing and yes even making some suggestions on how to try to save the SL early on, then seeing the same old, same old ideas has obviously reduced my patience for this subject which has gotten rather tiresome IMO, some of of my comments in my last post to you were over the top and for that I apologize.
I'm glad you've recognised there's no textev to support your hyper defense concept, and it was clever in a way; but being aware of all the clues or hints should have been accounted for earlier in your arguments, to be fair to your readers, and who knows, perhaps you actually hit something RFC overlooked, I doubt it but if you're right, then kudos.
I've had RFC correct my impressions of how things work or could because of clues I'd overlooked more times than I want to remember.
I've also forgotten how often I was right.
Claiming your imagination overrules or supplants the rules of the honorverse, though also used by other posters here, doesn't cut that much ice with me or other posters.
Regarding my imagination, its been directed at what RFC hasn't told us yet; I've been expressing it in several thousand posts here and at the bar over the years and I suspect RFC has been irked by at least a few of my posts, given his rather negative responses.
I've been curious about almost everything in the honorverse etc that's still a mystery; what's going to happen next after CoG, NTM about how the honor-verse works; how big is the human colonized part of the galaxy or the MMM, how much does a MDM cost and how many can the SKM/SEM or Haven afford to make every day; or for example just how large is Manticore's economic and financial impact on the SL, given it gets news so much faster than anywhere else, ie much of the SL's vibrant trade and financial heart is in the SKM because it has to be.
Being told you have too much testosterone is a compliment to most real men; if you feel I was bullying you because you were a woman, I apologize for not noticing any clues you gave.
But kudos for "adapting, improvising, and overcoming" the obstacles in your life.
While the marines made it a credo, all adults by definition do it, so congratulations again.
Good luck with your future ideas and posts; I've liked some in the past as you know, and know I will again in the future.
L
Lyonheart,
I don't think that the terms used by you were ones that are likely to endear you to many regardless of gender. I give respect to other posters regardless of whether I agree with them or not, I expect the same in return. That's not being a "sensitive woman" it's called common courtesy and civility where I come from.
Yes we are supposed to discuss ideas but using words such as "childish" and "pathetic" amongst others are hardly conducive to any kind of rational debate. It wasn't that you countered my argument that irritated me, it was the additional comment that I found offensive and unnecessary.
I'm well aware that, having been raised by a Marine, I'm familiar with the credo you mentioned. I don't think most people would call me sensitive, they'd call me someone who stands their ground when it's ground worth standing on.
That being said, thanks for the apology and I share your desire to not have any further unpleasantness with you.
I do want to comment however on "seriousness". I am very serious on the matters I've presented here. While I've found them challenging I'm the sort who relishes to the prospect of taking the "unwinnable" situation and attempting to figure out how to win anyway.
Having said that, nothing that I have knowingly said doesn't have a thread of logic based on information drawn from the books and available information about the Honorverse. I regard this as something different from RFC's intended story arc because the Honorverse and the story arc are not exactly the same. The Honorverse is the information we have about the setting and the forces at work within it. From any particular point in time, how things develop are based on the actions to be taken by those involved.
RFC will look at those conditions and determine how those decisions will be made, what actions will take place and write about it. However, from the same starting point, different decisions and actions can lead to different results. Those results are still based on the Honorverse, they may simply be different that what RFC intends to write.
This doesn't mean that evaluations which lead in a different direction than RFC will ultimately move aren't based on something or have no evidence to support them or that they aren't "serious".
For example, I can fairly easily look at the information available and predict that the events of Oyster Bay are likely to slow and blunt Alliance actions vs the League. This can give the League some time to do the things they need to do to survive. All of the information that the leaders of the League need to make effective decisions is almost certainly literally at their fingertips and none of them reached the positions they've attained by being dumb. Hence, all of the conditions for the League to take effective steps is present.
But as has been pointed out, even if the ingredients are present, it's like having everything you need to bake a cake except for the willingness to actually do the baking part. If the League could find enough people in the right position to do the baking, it could, based on the information available in the books, survive.
If all of these things are true, then the question is, will the leaders of the League use those ingredients in a way which gives the League a chance, or will they hesitate, ignore them or use them improperly instead.
By far the most likely answer to that questions is "no they won't". The intriguing question is, "what if they did?"
Anyway, thanks for your response.