Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Theemile and 51 guests

Missiles

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Missiles
Post by WLBjork   » Wed May 21, 2014 11:16 am

WLBjork
Commander

Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:45 am

Michael Everett wrote:
Lord Skimper wrote:You do realise the picture here still says the Nike has KH2.

http://maxxqbunine.deviantart.com/art/H ... -402966628


namelessfly wrote:Unlike an Ageemnon which can carry 360 Apolo pods internally,

A Nike has KH-2 because it can not carry Apollo pods except may be 100 tractored to its hull.

It makes such perfect sense does it not that the ship that has no use for KH-2 has a KH-2 but the ship that could usefully employ KH-2 does not.

Of course this might be related to our conspiracy to have me exploit the Apollo for BC(P) controversy to provoke Weber into stating that KH-2 has an impeller wedge so youcouldstarta thread that suckered him into stating that it does not.

Are we not diabolical?

...what


That was absolutely classic. In another thread, Skimper made reference to an ability of the Keyhole system. RFC stated he had never made any reference to such an ability. Skimper then confounded confounded probably everyone by referring to a Pearl in which RFC had given KH said capability. And yes, namelessfly had provoked the digression...
Top
Re: Missiles
Post by Jonathan_S   » Wed May 21, 2014 2:45 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8749
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

WLBjork wrote:
namelessfly wrote:Unlike an Ageemnon which can carry 360 Apolo pods internally,

A Nike has KH-2 because it can not carry Apollo pods except may be 100 tractored to its hull.

It makes such perfect sense does it not that the ship that has no use for KH-2 has a KH-2 but the ship that could usefully employ KH-2 does not.

Of course this might be related to our conspiracy to have me exploit the Apollo for BC(P) controversy to provoke Weber into stating that KH-2 has an impeller wedge so youcouldstarta thread that suckered him into stating that it does not.

Are we not diabolical?
***
Michael Everett wrote:
...what
***

That was absolutely classic. In another thread, Skimper made reference to an ability of the Keyhole system. RFC stated he had never made any reference to such an ability. Skimper then confounded confounded probably everyone by referring to a Pearl in which RFC had given KH said capability. And yes, namelessfly had provoked the digression...
I thought SVW respectfully pointed out that old Pearl.
Top
Re: Missiles
Post by Theemile   » Fri May 23, 2014 3:24 pm

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5225
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

batron352 wrote:Don't want to open a can of worms. Is there a thread that lists the stats of the missiles from the books? The Honorvurse wiki page doesn't really list a lot of them.


Back to the original intent of the thread, we do have a little information in the open. The most information we have is on the Mk 13 Cruiser missile and the Mk 16 DDM cruiser missile.

The Mk 13's information comes from the armor appendix of In Fire Forged (Compilation #5). The Mk 16's information comes from the appendix at the end of Storm from the Shadows.

Known Masses
Mk50 - 78 tons (Outdated DD/CL missile) OBS
Mk13 - 84 Tons (Single drive CA/BC missile) IFF
Mk16 - 94 tons (DDM CA/BC missile) SftS
Mk19 - 130 Tons (Single drive Capitol missile)

The mk 13's dimensions are given in IFF, as some errata on the mk 16 is found in the text and appendix of SftS.

Was trere some specific information you were looking for?
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top

Return to Honorverse