Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dauntless, Google [Bot] and 62 guests

Hyperspace Combat and the Solarian Leauge Navy

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Hyperspace Combat and the Solarian Leauge Navy
Post by Weird Harold   » Mon May 05, 2014 11:18 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

n7axw wrote:Secondly, IIRC, In HAE, Wayfarer had LACs that she deployed in hyper. I would presume that if Wayfarer could do it, a CLAC can do the same thing.


That's why the SLN's only point of advantage would be in a grav wave where missiles and LACs can't be used.

Intercepting fleets and/or convoys in a grav wave is possible -- cf Heleln Zilwicki the elder -- but it would not seem a cost effective tactic, taking far more ships (and luck) to guarantee an interception than simply lying doggo near the hyper-limit with a few ships.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Hyperspace Combat and the Solarian Leauge Navy
Post by Weird Harold   » Mon May 05, 2014 11:25 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

Jonathan_S wrote:... Also, the convoy commander would have to be pretty sure they wouldn't need to jump to a different band; because if they were force to do so they'd be abandoning any LACs that had moved too far from the convoy - so you'd need to balance the risk of abandoning LACs against their addition to the fight.


Isn't standard practice for CLACs to hyper out when possible and meet their LACs at a prearranged point away from the combat? Seems like that should apply to a theoretical need to change bands as well as it does to N-space tactics.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Hyperspace Combat and the Solarian Leauge Navy
Post by kzt   » Mon May 05, 2014 11:28 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Weird Harold wrote:That's why the SLN's only point of advantage would be in a grav wave where missiles and LACs can't be used.

Intercepting fleets and/or convoys in a grav wave is possible -- cf Heleln Zilwicki the elder -- but it would not seem a cost effective tactic, taking far more ships (and luck) to guarantee an interception than simply lying doggo near the hyper-limit with a few ships.


No, being able to avoid a swarm of thousands of Apollo missiles by changing bands is a pretty huge advantage. Essentially the SLN needs to not fight inside the hyperlimit anywhere they can possible avoid it, and only do it then when they have massive numbers and huge amount of firepower from system defense pods etc.
Last edited by kzt on Mon May 05, 2014 11:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Re: Hyperspace Combat and the Solarian Leauge Navy
Post by SWM   » Mon May 05, 2014 11:28 pm

SWM
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5928
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: U.S. east coast

I would like to point out that David has discussed the possibility that merchant convoys could tractor a few LACs to their hulls to provide protection. He did not state specifically that he was going to write that in, but it sounded like he probably would.
--------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine
Top
Re: Hyperspace Combat and the Solarian Leauge Navy
Post by kzt   » Mon May 05, 2014 11:32 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

SWM wrote:I would like to point out that David has discussed the possibility that merchant convoys could tractor a few LACs to their hulls to provide protection. He did not state specifically that he was going to write that in, but it sounded like he probably would.

It's only useful if you have an opportunity to deploy them. If you appear on Alpha with 100 LACs tractored to your hull but are 1.3 LS away from a SLN BC the BC is going to win.
Top
Re: Hyperspace Combat and the Solarian Leauge Navy
Post by n7axw   » Mon May 05, 2014 11:35 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Jonathan_S wrote:
n7axw wrote:There seems to me to be some things to consider here.

The most obvious has to do with the comparative quality of the sensors both sides are using. Sollies are probably superior to merchi sensors. But if the escort is Sag-cs or Rolands, the Sollies probably get spotted before they spring their surprise.

Secondly, IIRC, In HAE, Wayfarer had LACs that she deployed in hyper. I would presume that if Wayfarer could do it, a CLAC can do the same thing. Given the poor sensor conditions in hyper, a wing of graser armed Shrikes would be far harder to detect than BCs and could rather unpleasantly turn the tables on who surprises who. :mrgreen:

Don
If both groups are under power then yes, I'd expect the RMN escorts to spot the SLN units at least a bit before they themselves were spotted. But if the SLN are coasting along with their drive down (or if in a 'wave at least having their sails tuned just to steady them) they can much more easily be stealthed. In that scenario the RMN's superior sensors are probably more than offset by the vastly different levels of detectability of the two forces.

As the the LACs. Yes, assuming the convoy is outside a grav wave and assuming a CLAC is present it's certainly capable of launching LACs in defense. Now a CLAC is a pretty high value asset to use for routine convoy escort; I doubt any but the most valuable convoys would rate that level of protection. Also, the convoy commander would have to be pretty sure they wouldn't need to jump to a different band; because if they were force to do so they'd be abandoning any LACs that had moved too far from the convoy - so you'd need to balance the risk of abandoning LACs against their addition to the fight.


Good points. The only comment I might add is that you wouldn't necessarily need an all up CLAC to get a useful number of LACs into hyper. Wayfarer did it and she was a Q-ship. Also there could be the possibility of tractoring LACs to the hull. With reference to the point about a convoy jumping to another band, you simply arrange to leave the tender behind with the LACs.
If the enemy is sufficiently distracted by LACs, the
convoy gets away.

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Hyperspace Combat and the Solarian Leauge Navy
Post by Jonathan_S   » Mon May 05, 2014 11:43 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8971
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Weird Harold wrote:
Jonathan_S wrote:... Also, the convoy commander would have to be pretty sure they wouldn't need to jump to a different band; because if they were force to do so they'd be abandoning any LACs that had moved too far from the convoy - so you'd need to balance the risk of abandoning LACs against their addition to the fight.


Isn't standard practice for CLACs to hyper out when possible and meet their LACs at a prearranged point away from the combat? Seems like that should apply to a theoretical need to change bands as well as it does to N-space tactics.

A lot easier to find the LACs again in n-space than after you've move to another hyper band.

For one thing sensor conditions are a heck of a lot better in n-space.

For another n-space isn't moving on you; so you only really have to worry about your own movements; you can go back to a fixed envious point fairly easily (and can take nav sighting if you miss it to relocate yourself). LACs involved in a running battle in one hyperband would have moved significantly compared to even the nearest adjacent band; make it harder for everyone to pull off the rendezvous. (Also don't know how well LAC nav systems can act as a hyper-log; but if they're within sensor range of remaining escorts or merchants after the fight then that's probably a moot point)
Top
Re: Hyperspace Combat and the Solarian Leauge Navy
Post by Gun Boat Diplomacy   » Mon May 05, 2014 11:49 pm

Gun Boat Diplomacy
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:49 pm
Location: Sanger, Ca.

maybe I'm wrong but didn't Saganami and Zilwici die honorable deaths fighting overwhelming odds in hyper? why would we think that a Sollie fleet would stand a chance against the GA fleet? granted, a commerce raiding force might stand a chance....if there were no escorts
Top
Re: Hyperspace Combat and the Solarian Leauge Navy
Post by kzt   » Mon May 05, 2014 11:55 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Gun Boat Diplomacy wrote:maybe I'm wrong but didn't Saganami and Zilwici die honorable deaths fighting overwhelming odds in hyper? why would we think that a Sollie fleet would stand a chance against the GA fleet? granted, a commerce raiding force might stand a chance....if there were no escorts

SLN SDs have 6+ meter grasers and SD armor. Against the effectively nil armor and much lighter grasers of a RMN DD the SD will cut it apart. Assuming it can engineer such a fight, which is in question.
Top
Re: Hyperspace Combat and the Solarian Leauge Navy
Post by Weird Harold   » Tue May 06, 2014 12:38 am

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

Gun Boat Diplomacy wrote:maybe I'm wrong but didn't Saganami and Zilwici die honorable deaths fighting overwhelming odds in hyper?


Helen the Elder, yes. Saganami, no.

[quote="Gun Boat Diplomacy"why would we think that a Sollie fleet would stand a chance against the GA fleet? granted, a commerce raiding force might stand a chance....if there were no escorts[/quote]

Any time the SLN can engineer an energy range, or energy only fight, they have the advantage because their ships are energy heavy. Their advantage is not as great as simple numbers would suggest, because GA ships have heavier energy mounts if not more numerous, but it IS an advantage.

The only place an energy-only fight can be guaranteed is in a grav wave, but anywhere in Hyper will let the SLN start closer to energy range more often than in N-space
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top

Return to Honorverse