Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 88 guests
Re: How much Technology was Stolen | |
---|---|
by biochem » Sun May 04, 2014 2:57 pm | |
biochem
Posts: 1372
|
The most likely tech to survive such an assault would be an ultra-hardened ultra-armored "black box" device such as those they are hunting for with flight 370. However as we have seen no textev of this type of apparatus being used, I think it is extremely unlikely. Possible but extremely unlikely. Actually the organization most likely to have such a device would be the SLN Battle fleet not the RMN. Up until the recent unpleasantness the most likely cause of destruction of a battle fleet ship would be some sort of perfect storm type accident, the kind of thing were you would want data in order to prevent it from reoccurring. In the case of the RMN which has been fighting actual battles for decades, the benefits to the enemy (assuming someone was able to crack the encryption) far outweigh the benefits to the RMN. So it makes no logical sense for a RMN ship to have such a device.
|
Top |
Re: How much Technology was Stolen | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Sun May 04, 2014 3:04 pm | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8792
|
You're probably right, but playing devil's advocate, it seems that the geometry is such that the shots against Rapier were virtually guaranteed to hit a fusion reactor (releasing a catastrophic secondary explosion). Getting hit from nearly straight ahead, in a crossed the 'T' engagement, means the weapons are smashing down the length of the ship. Getting hit from a more broadside geometry and those grasers are going to 'simply' be punching through the narrow width of the ship. So unless they hit near the fairly small bit of length the reactor is in you won't have that devastating direct strike and might have time for the safety systems to scram the reactor before it blows. But there were a lot of energy weapons that probably were firing on the DDs, and without a deliberate fire plan to avoid probably reactor locations it's likely that (in this case) the difference in engagement geometry didn't make a significant difference. |
Top |
Re: How much Technology was Stolen | |
---|---|
by wastedfly » Sun May 04, 2014 6:54 pm | |
wastedfly
Posts: 832
|
Uh, guys, look up the footage of Crossroads(23kton fission) and Castle, Bravo(~15Mt H-Fission), etc of hydrogen bomb tests at Bikini atoll in the S. Pac. You will note that steel ships, remained remotely, ship "shape" intact even when near the eppicenter. You will also note that the original test in Nevada left the steel girders. Now the 15Mt blast made a giant crater, but was the dirt vaporized or just thrown out? It was thrown out by and large with some vaporized and this pressure wave used to blast the rest out.
For all we know, said fusion plants, even at Stand by power levels are equivalent of 1 Gton bombs. That would vaporize the entire ship. Of course that is what the books says, so... I will go with finely vaporized ship. |
Top |
Re: How much Technology was Stolen | |
---|---|
by n7axw » Sun May 04, 2014 7:37 pm | |
n7axw
Posts: 5997
|
In the interest of accuracy, a courior did get away to report to Myers, as I recall. Don When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
|
Top |
Re: How much Technology was Stolen | |
---|---|
by kzt » Sun May 04, 2014 7:48 pm | |
kzt
Posts: 11360
|
No, the books show that a single failed fusion reactor is roughly equivalent to a 25,000 gigaton weapon. Which I think would have had some seriously adverse effects on the SLN squadrons, not to mention setting afire the entire hemisphere of the planet facing. So I think we can safely say that no reactors blew up. |
Top |
Re: How much Technology was Stolen | |
---|---|
by thinkstoomuch » Sun May 04, 2014 8:28 pm | |
thinkstoomuch
Posts: 2727
|
Not going into the real world physics or anything but a PRN BC at Hades survived its consort Attilla's reactor explosion blowing up at 600 km range. Though a CA closer did not. And the commander thought if more than one reactor went off then it probably would not. EoH end of Chap 46 for all the details that we have.
Only reason I actually know this is it was another of those stray thoughts that went flying through my "mind". "Shouldn't there have been damage to Byng's ships." Thankfully this time I had enough time to reconsider before posting. Have a good week, T2M
-----------------------
Q: “How can something be worth more than it costs? Isn’t everything ‘worth’ what it costs?” A: “No. That’s just the price. ... Christopher Anvil from Top Line in "War Games" |
Top |
Re: How much Technology was Stolen | |
---|---|
by kzt » Sun May 04, 2014 9:10 pm | |
kzt
Posts: 11360
|
The BC that survived had a half-meter of armor vaporized (which is how you can determine the effective yield). That's an enormous impulsive shock imparted to the ship, so I'd bet it wouldn't have been marked as fully mission capable on the next inspection. A lot less impulsive shock than that would tend to break lots of important things on a ship, not the least of which is the crew. Plus I wasn't joking about setting the entire hemisphere afire, I've seen calculations that you could use a single 100MT bomb at high elevation to ignite the entire US eastern seaboard on a clear day in the fall (when you have lots of dry leaves). So I'd tend to argue that you didn't get a fusion reactor blowing up, as the global firestorm probably would have been mentioned in the planets complaints to the SLN... |
Top |
Re: How much Technology was Stolen | |
---|---|
by BobG » Sun May 04, 2014 11:36 pm | |
BobG
Posts: 288
|
My opinion is that if 16 BCs fired their broadsides at 3 DDs (well, CLs by size), and if the DDs had their fusion plants online, then their reactors almost certainly blew (99.99%), in which case I doubt anything within the ship's armor survived, as it would channel and contain the blast. And when you add the capacitors to the equation... Of course, the 100+ BC-class grasers would do a fairly good job even without that. -- Bob G SF & Fantasy: The only things better than Chocolate.
|
Top |
Re: How much Technology was Stolen | |
---|---|
by Garth 2 » Mon May 05, 2014 2:50 am | |
Garth 2
Posts: 426
|
I don't think anything of value would have survived the explosion.
Doesn't mean that the SLNI (assuming some had any authority/brains to do so) or one of the SDF intelligence agencies hasn't managed to partial penetrate Manticore or one of the Manticore Alliance partners and acquire some specs. We know by about IEHs, that some SDFs were starting to experiment with gravity pulse technology. |
Top |
Re: How much Technology was Stolen | |
---|---|
by thinkstoomuch » Mon May 05, 2014 7:11 am | |
thinkstoomuch
Posts: 2727
|
Notice the distance 600 km versus 5,000 km. Honor had traffic control herd all the warships into a small area given approximately 8 times the distance means 64 times less effect. Instead of a half meter of armor 8 mm would be adequate. I am thinking even those SLN DDs have thicker hull plating than that.
As far as affecting the planet apparently another case of real world versus handwavum world, my apologies but I just ain't looking that stuff up. Attila did nothing to Hades. So a fusion plant blowing up in orbit does not affect the planet. Have fun, T2M
-----------------------
Q: “How can something be worth more than it costs? Isn’t everything ‘worth’ what it costs?” A: “No. That’s just the price. ... Christopher Anvil from Top Line in "War Games" |
Top |