Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 76 guests

How much Technology was Stolen

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: How much Technology was Stolen
Post by biochem   » Sun May 04, 2014 2:57 pm

biochem
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1372
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 8:06 pm
Location: USA

The most likely tech to survive such an assault would be an ultra-hardened ultra-armored "black box" device such as those they are hunting for with flight 370. However as we have seen no textev of this type of apparatus being used, I think it is extremely unlikely. Possible but extremely unlikely. Actually the organization most likely to have such a device would be the SLN Battle fleet not the RMN. Up until the recent unpleasantness the most likely cause of destruction of a battle fleet ship would be some sort of perfect storm type accident, the kind of thing were you would want data in order to prevent it from reoccurring. In the case of the RMN which has been fighting actual battles for decades, the benefits to the enemy (assuming someone was able to crack the encryption) far outweigh the benefits to the RMN. So it makes no logical sense for a RMN ship to have such a device.
Top
Re: How much Technology was Stolen
Post by Jonathan_S   » Sun May 04, 2014 3:04 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8792
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Crown Loyalist wrote:Probably the closest example we have in the series of the kind of firepower that each DD suffered is the destruction of PNS Rapier at Cerberus. She was struck down the throat by the graser fire of four battlecruisers, four heavy cruisers, and two light cruisers. Her fusion bottle let go, and the resulting explosions "consumed [the splintered fragments of her hull] in the instant that they consumed them along with her entire crew."

There was nothing at all left of PNS Rapier.

Now, PNS Rapier was caught without sidewalls because she had her T crossed, but Rapier was a heavy cruiser and was struck down the throat, which if you're going to be hit without sidewalls is at least the part of the hull with the most armor. She also was a heavy cruiser, with heavy cruiser armoring.

The Rolands were struck by more graser fire each than Rapier was. They were smaller targets, they were unarmored, and they're much, much more fragile than a Sword-class Heavy Cruiser. There's a reasonably good chance that the battlecruisers had shots at the completely vulnerable tops and bottoms of Chatterjee's ships, because none of them had their wedges up. And, on top of all that, the range was much shorter than it was at Cerberus.

There was nothing left of Chatterjee's ships.
You're probably right, but playing devil's advocate, it seems that the geometry is such that the shots against Rapier were virtually guaranteed to hit a fusion reactor (releasing a catastrophic secondary explosion).

Getting hit from nearly straight ahead, in a crossed the 'T' engagement, means the weapons are smashing down the length of the ship. Getting hit from a more broadside geometry and those grasers are going to 'simply' be punching through the narrow width of the ship. So unless they hit near the fairly small bit of length the reactor is in you won't have that devastating direct strike and might have time for the safety systems to scram the reactor before it blows.


But there were a lot of energy weapons that probably were firing on the DDs, and without a deliberate fire plan to avoid probably reactor locations it's likely that (in this case) the difference in engagement geometry didn't make a significant difference.
Top
Re: How much Technology was Stolen
Post by wastedfly   » Sun May 04, 2014 6:54 pm

wastedfly
Commodore

Posts: 832
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:23 am

Uh, guys, look up the footage of Crossroads(23kton fission) and Castle, Bravo(~15Mt H-Fission), etc of hydrogen bomb tests at Bikini atoll in the S. Pac. You will note that steel ships, remained remotely, ship "shape" intact even when near the eppicenter. You will also note that the original test in Nevada left the steel girders. Now the 15Mt blast made a giant crater, but was the dirt vaporized or just thrown out? It was thrown out by and large with some vaporized and this pressure wave used to blast the rest out.

For all we know, said fusion plants, even at Stand by power levels are equivalent of 1 Gton bombs. That would vaporize the entire ship. Of course that is what the books says, so... I will go with finely vaporized ship. :idea:
Top
Re: How much Technology was Stolen
Post by n7axw   » Sun May 04, 2014 7:37 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Potato wrote:Byng did not have a single solitary clue about what he was facing when Tenth Fleet showed up to kick his butt. That alone is proof that he did not recover anything regarding Manticore's tech.

Furthermore, the other posters are dead on when they say that no ships had left New Tuscany, so there is no way that the information could have even left the system to make its way to the SLN. Tenth Fleet made sure to scrub all of Byng's surviving ships clean, so there is nothing for the SLN to build on. This is all quite clearly laid out in the text.

HB of CJ wrote:Assume is a dangerous word. Lots of us here are just ASSUMING because of many different reasons, but could some of it just be because assuming makes one feel good because it rubs your funny bone correctly?

Never assume. If a solution, opinion or decision makes you feel "good" or seems "logical", then it is probably wrong. There is always wreckage. There is always the potential for human survivors. To assume otherwise is very dangerous indeed.

Yeah, all of this is imaginary. A very very good book series that lets us relax and have fun. Not to be taken too seriously. All I am saying is that we may find out later in future books....

.... that the Sollies did in fact recover all sorts of neat things. Small bits, tiny bits, some large bits. How about some intact blasted off closed up compartments with human survivors? Something always survives.

My read only. I love this forum. HB of CJ (old coot) :) :) :) The Sollies may have gotten it all. It will take some time to figure it all out and then reverse engineer, but not that much time. Yikes!! The sleeping giant!



In the interest of accuracy, a courior did get away to report to Myers, as I recall.

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: How much Technology was Stolen
Post by kzt   » Sun May 04, 2014 7:48 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

wastedfly wrote:For all we know, said fusion plants, even at Stand by power levels are equivalent of 1 Gton bombs. That would vaporize the entire ship. Of course that is what the books says, so... I will go with finely vaporized ship. :idea:

No, the books show that a single failed fusion reactor is roughly equivalent to a 25,000 gigaton weapon. Which I think would have had some seriously adverse effects on the SLN squadrons, not to mention setting afire the entire hemisphere of the planet facing. :roll:

So I think we can safely say that no reactors blew up.
Top
Re: How much Technology was Stolen
Post by thinkstoomuch   » Sun May 04, 2014 8:28 pm

thinkstoomuch
Admiral

Posts: 2727
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: United States of America

Not going into the real world physics or anything but a PRN BC at Hades survived its consort Attilla's reactor explosion blowing up at 600 km range. Though a CA closer did not. And the commander thought if more than one reactor went off then it probably would not. EoH end of Chap 46 for all the details that we have.

Only reason I actually know this is it was another of those stray thoughts that went flying through my "mind". "Shouldn't there have been damage to Byng's ships."

Thankfully this time I had enough time to reconsider before posting.

Have a good week,
T2M

kzt wrote:No, the books show that a single failed fusion reactor is roughly equivalent to a 25,000 gigaton weapon. Which I think would have had some seriously adverse effects on the SLN squadrons, not to mention setting afire the entire hemisphere of the planet facing. :roll:

So I think we can safely say that no reactors blew up.
-----------------------
Q: “How can something be worth more than it costs? Isn’t everything ‘worth’ what it costs?”
A: “No. That’s just the price. ...
Christopher Anvil from Top Line in "War Games"
Top
Re: How much Technology was Stolen
Post by kzt   » Sun May 04, 2014 9:10 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

thinkstoomuch wrote:Not going into the real world physics or anything but a PRN BC at Hades survived its consort Attilla's reactor explosion blowing up at 600 km range. Though a CA closer did not. And the commander thought if more than one reactor went off then it probably would not. EoH end of Chap 46 for all the details that we have.

The BC that survived had a half-meter of armor vaporized (which is how you can determine the effective yield). That's an enormous impulsive shock imparted to the ship, so I'd bet it wouldn't have been marked as fully mission capable on the next inspection. :lol:

A lot less impulsive shock than that would tend to break lots of important things on a ship, not the least of which is the crew.


Plus I wasn't joking about setting the entire hemisphere afire, I've seen calculations that you could use a single 100MT bomb at high elevation to ignite the entire US eastern seaboard on a clear day in the fall (when you have lots of dry leaves). So I'd tend to argue that you didn't get a fusion reactor blowing up, as the global firestorm probably would have been mentioned in the planets complaints to the SLN...
Top
Re: How much Technology was Stolen
Post by BobG   » Sun May 04, 2014 11:36 pm

BobG
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 288
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:23 pm
Location: Westford, MA

smr wrote:When the 3 destroyers were destroyed in the Talbot sector at New Tuscany, how much technology survived on the destroyed destroyers.

Did they take some of Mark 16 missles?

Did any of the ghost rider platforms survive?

Did any of the ship's impellar rooms survive?

Did any of the main computers survive?

My opinion is that if 16 BCs fired their broadsides at 3 DDs (well, CLs by size), and if the DDs had their fusion plants online, then their reactors almost certainly blew (99.99%), in which case I doubt anything within the ship's armor survived, as it would channel and contain the blast. And when you add the capacitors to the equation...

Of course, the 100+ BC-class grasers would do a fairly good job even without that.

-- Bob G
SF & Fantasy: The only things better than Chocolate.
Top
Re: How much Technology was Stolen
Post by Garth 2   » Mon May 05, 2014 2:50 am

Garth 2
Captain of the List

Posts: 426
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:04 am

I don't think anything of value would have survived the explosion.

Doesn't mean that the SLNI (assuming some had any authority/brains to do so) or one of the SDF intelligence agencies hasn't managed to partial penetrate Manticore or one of the Manticore Alliance partners and acquire some specs.

We know by about IEHs, that some SDFs were starting to experiment with gravity pulse technology.
Top
Re: How much Technology was Stolen
Post by thinkstoomuch   » Mon May 05, 2014 7:11 am

thinkstoomuch
Admiral

Posts: 2727
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: United States of America

Notice the distance 600 km versus 5,000 km. Honor had traffic control herd all the warships into a small area given approximately 8 times the distance means 64 times less effect. Instead of a half meter of armor 8 mm would be adequate. I am thinking even those SLN DDs have thicker hull plating than that.

As far as affecting the planet apparently another case of real world versus handwavum world, my apologies but I just ain't looking that stuff up. Attila did nothing to Hades. So a fusion plant blowing up in orbit does not affect the planet.

Have fun,
T2M

kzt wrote:The BC that survived had a half-meter of armor vaporized (which is how you can determine the effective yield). That's an enormous impulsive shock imparted to the ship, so I'd bet it wouldn't have been marked as fully mission capable on the next inspection. :lol:

A lot less impulsive shock than that would tend to break lots of important things on a ship, not the least of which is the crew.


Plus I wasn't joking about setting the entire hemisphere afire, I've seen calculations that you could use a single 100MT bomb at high elevation to ignite the entire US eastern seaboard on a clear day in the fall (when you have lots of dry leaves). So I'd tend to argue that you didn't get a fusion reactor blowing up, as the global firestorm probably would have been mentioned in the planets complaints to the SLN...
-----------------------
Q: “How can something be worth more than it costs? Isn’t everything ‘worth’ what it costs?”
A: “No. That’s just the price. ...
Christopher Anvil from Top Line in "War Games"
Top

Return to Honorverse