Howard T. Map-addict wrote:WinterFlames,
Would you also say that Monks don't reproduce, so
Monasteries (sic) are unlikely to have lengthy futures
as cohesive communities?
And then there were the Shakers.
It is the Immigrants that keep them going.
Where
are the Shakers?
And what do you call "immigrants" with respect to homosexuality?
(Be very careful how you answer, because the R-word is politically incorrect.)Monastic enclaves can only exist within the larger community that sends sons and daughters off to abbeys, monasteries and convents. They can only be a small minority of that larger community under historic levels of fertility and maternal, infant, and child mortality before demographic collapse occurs.
Many societal norms with regard to sexuality are implicitly based on the hard facts of those fertility/mortality statistics. One of the reasons why most cultures reserve the most dangerous jobs for men is because we're dispensable in the reproductive equation, while fertile females most definitely are not.
DW has written much about how well a 3:1 sex ratio can function, but do notice that he didn't flip it the other way like Heinlein did in
The Moon is a Harsh Mistress (which grew its population at first by various deportations from Earth, and had 21st-century medical care available in any event, unlike Grayson through its early history).
So long as there are enough men to do those dangerous jobs like hunting large animals so that the tribe can eat, and the incidence of outright male homosexuality (as opposed to bisexuality) doesn't get awfully high, the men who are willing to keep all those fertile women serially pregnant are sufficient to maintain positive population growth despite the high rates of maternal, infant, and child mortality. (Women who don't find men sexually attractive, but are willing to occasionally put up with one as a necessary evil to get pregnant, are in this respect roughly equivalent to fully-heterosexual women, but those who flat refuse to make any babies are definitely a negative in this equation. Modern techniques of artificial insemination allow the man to be somewhat detached from this process.)
The limiting factor on population in such cases is "How many girls can the average woman bear that survive to become mothers themselves?" If that number is greater than one, there can be population growth, (provided that in addition to the girls, a few boys also live long enough to reproduce) but if it is less than one, there can't.
So it's 100% understandable that Grayson society was resistant to letting women go out and work in places like Blackbird, and Oyster Bay is likely to cause a lot of people who were previously willing to go along with the new ways to have second thoughts about it.
By contrast, Manticore has Prolong and good enough medical care that fertile women aren't nearly such a precious resource, which is why there are so many women in the RMN compared to the GSN.