Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests
Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by saber964 » Sun Apr 13, 2014 3:21 pm | |
saber964
Posts: 2423
|
This forum is for speculations on inventions that would help the Empire of Charis wage war but are not weapons eg cannons rifles, but would greatly enhance Charis war making potential in subtle ways like the sewing machine which can speed up the manufacture of things like uniforms, tents and blankets.
One invention that I feel would help Charis in a small but significant way would be a manual typewriter. Imagine trying to write a 20 or 30 page report long hand. An average person can write long hand at about 20 to 30 WPM Vs a typewriter at 60 to 100 WPM. |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by Captain Igloo » Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:45 pm | |
Captain Igloo
Posts: 269
|
My entry: the Hulett ore unloader |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by Philip Stanley » Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:49 pm | |
Philip Stanley
Posts: 109
|
I've proposed this before. Why doesn't the college come up with the Slide Rule? If Dr. Mahklyn has published a paper on the theory of gravity, the prevailing level of mathematical skills is certainly advanced enough to include the concept of logarithms, and from there, it's only a hop, skip, and jump to the slide rule. Once a skilled mathematician has designed and laid out the scales for the prototype, any competant workman could replicate them over and over and produce rules in quantity (this is how they were made on Earth in the 18th and early 19th century)
Using even a relatively simple slide rule with a small set of scales, such as a Mannheim- or Reiss-pattern rule, multiplication, division, trigonometry, etc. are enormously speeded up and simplified. And, of course, neither the prototype nor the duplicates generate or use any tell-tale electricity The slide rule is, admittedly, limited in precision. A 10-inch rule is only accurate to about three decimal places (205 times 7 is 143x, where x is uknown), but for the vast majority of engineering and technical calculations this is more than enough, and the advantages in calculating speed and accuracy are enormous. Philip Stanley |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by Whingnut » Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:21 pm | |
Whingnut
Posts: 6
|
I know that they had a lot of clerks who did calculations. And I feel like all their books are hand written. The introduction of printed and movable type would revolutionize communication and education. Books would be less expensive to produce and the advances in propaganda would be significant. It would also allow for the creation of instruction manuals for manufacturing and construction that would be easy to reproduce.
Does anyone remember if the broadsheets are created on printing presses? Whingnut
Just another loose knut behind the wheel |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by DrakBibliophile » Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:50 pm | |
DrakBibliophile
Posts: 2311
|
Safehold already has printing presses including movable type.
*
Paul Howard (Alias Drak Bibliophile) * Sometimes The Dragon Wins! [Polite Dragon Smile] * |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by pokermind » Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:15 pm | |
pokermind
Posts: 4002
|
King's college's brightest student sent to various parts of the Empire to form Emperor's collages thus providing more and more higher education, and more universities. Perhaps the start of learned journals, perhaps with some seed ideas from an anomalous thinker naked Owl
Poker CPO Poker Mind and, Mangy Fur the Smart Alick Spacecat.
"Better to be hung for a hexapuma than a housecat," Com. Pang Yau-pau, ART. |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by Direwolf18 » Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:32 pm | |
Direwolf18
Posts: 506
|
I very much expect this to happen, and for Iris to be a major force behind it. Get a few professors on loan, like that botanist, whats his name... Have them open up shop in Corisande. |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by Whingnut » Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:54 pm | |
Whingnut
Posts: 6
|
Marine chronometer to find the longitude. For greater accuracy in sea transportation. Actually knowing your longitute (latitude is relatively easy) would lower the need for dead reckoning. A chronometer would require less information than celestial navigation (think of all those stars, planets, lunar cycles and their relative location on every night) It's invention would require the application of bimetallic springs. I know that safehold has some textev about watches I just forget where I read it (anyone know where). .
Of note. Failing to wind the chronometer on a ship was a mastable and keelhaulable offense. Last edited by Whingnut on Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Whingnut
Just another loose knut behind the wheel |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by Tonto Silerheels » Sun Apr 13, 2014 7:03 pm | |
Tonto Silerheels
Posts: 454
|
saber964 wrote:
This forum is for speculations on inventions that would help the Empire of Charis wage war but are not weapons eg cannons rifles, but would greatly enhance Charis war making potential in subtle ways like the sewing machine which can speed up the manufacture of things like uniforms, tents and blankets. General Eisenhower expressed the opinion that four inventions won World War II. They were the jeep, the C47 airplane, the two-and-a-half ton truck, and the bulldozer, none of which were designed for combat. ~Tonto |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by Tenshinai » Sun Apr 13, 2014 9:18 pm | |
Tenshinai
Posts: 2893
|
Add mechanical calculators, like the ones that became popular during the 19th century RW, to that and maths suddenly goes a lot quicker.
A NAKED Owl? Do i want to know what kind of seed ideas that would be?
Meh. The truck maybe. Something vastly more important however was cutting down on margins of precision. Which in turn allowed things like the Liberty ships, even when parts were not made in the same place or with the same tools, they were close enough in size that they fit together without too much trouble. So i´ll add that as my contribution. Have someone put together a set of standards for measuring, both the tools for measuring, the measurements, and how they are used, then make sure that everyone uses that standard as soon as possible. As part of this, you also reduce the margins of error that is acceptable. What it means, is that if a nut and a bolt are supposed to fit together, they WILL. Which for example means that spare parts will nearly always fit without adjustments, which can save a LOT of time and effort. A perfect example of not doing this, is WWII Japan. Parts and spare parts for aircrafts nearly always had to be individually fitted to aircraft, and worked on locally, even engines could often not be switched out without a lot of work. Effectively, it doubled the amount of workhours spent on the average aircraft and caused lots of wasted parts and material. This leads to massproduction and reliable automatic firearms among other things. |
Top |